BMW K 1200 R 2005 vs. Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
BMW K 1200 R 2005
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Pregled - BMW K 1200 R 2005 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
The BMW K 1200 R model year 2005 and the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 model year 2011 are both naked bikes with powerful engines and similar fuel tank capacities. However, there are several differences between the two models that make them unique in their own ways.
In terms of engine power, the BMW K 1200 R takes the lead with 160 HP compared to the Triumph Speed Triple's 132 HP. This means that the BMW offers a more powerful and potentially faster ride. Additionally, the BMW has four cylinders compared to the Triumph's three, which may contribute to its higher power output.
BMW K 1200 R 2005
Both bikes have liquid cooling systems, ensuring optimal engine performance and preventing overheating. The engine displacements also differ, with the BMW having a larger 1157 ccm engine compared to the Triumph's 1050 ccm engine. This suggests that the BMW may have more torque and overall power.
When it comes to dimensions and weights, the BMW has a longer wheelbase of 1571 mm compared to the Triumph's 1437 mm. A longer wheelbase can contribute to better stability and handling, especially at high speeds. However, the Triumph compensates for its shorter wheelbase with a slightly larger fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters compared to the BMW's 17 liters. This means that the Triumph may have a slightly longer range before needing to refuel.
In terms of strengths, the BMW K 1200 R is praised for its easy start, positive chassis concept, and smooth handling even at high speeds. It also boasts an optimal braking system that includes ABS, ensuring safe and controlled stopping power. On the other hand, the Triumph Speed Triple is commended for its controlled chassis, hard sound, and overall stability.
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The BMW K 1200 R requires some effort in fast turns, which may affect its maneuverability in certain situations. On the other hand, the Triumph Speed Triple's rough gearing can sometimes disrupt the harmony between the rider and the machine, potentially affecting the overall riding experience.
In conclusion, the BMW K 1200 R 2005 and the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 are both powerful naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The BMW offers more engine power and a longer wheelbase, while the Triumph focuses on controlled chassis and stability. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Tehnične specifikacije BMW K 1200 R 2005 v primerjavi z Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Primerjava prednosti in slabosti
Primerjava prednosti in slabosti
BMW K 1200 R 2005
Veliko moči motornega kolesa pod logotipom BMW še vedno vzbuja začudenje tudi med štirikolesnimi udeleženci v prometu.
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Even a Super Duke is in a tight spot when the bends are not too sharp and the KTM can make full use of its radical handling and its unrivalled ability to correct the radius on naked bikes. The Speed Triple is more harmonious, patient and predictable. The Duke has to be beaten, the Triple can also be stroked.
Primerjava povprečnih tržnih cen BMW K 1200 R vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050
There are a few key differences between a BMW K 1200 R 2005 and a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011. It takes less time to sell a BMW K 1200 R with 60 days compared to 77 days for a Triumph Speed Triple 1050. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 7 reviews for the BMW K 1200 R and 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 since model year 2005. The first review for the BMW K 1200 R was published on 10/24/2004 and now has more than 1,700 views. This compares to more than 16,200 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple 1050 published on 10/2/2007.
