KTM 790 Adventure R 2020 vs. KTM 1090 Adventure 2017

The KTM 790 Adventure R 2020 and the KTM 1090 Adventure 2017 are both enduro motorcycles with similar features and capabilities. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine specifications, the KTM 790 Adventure R 2020 has an in-line engine with a bore of 88 mm and a stroke of 65.7 mm. It produces 95 horsepower and 88 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the KTM 1090 Adventure 2017 has a V-type engine with a bore of 103 mm and a stroke of 63 mm. It offers a higher power output of 125 horsepower and 109 Nm of torque. Both bikes have electric starters and chain transmissions.

When it comes to suspension, the KTM 790 Adventure R 2020 features a front suspension with an upside-down telescopic fork from WP, with a diameter of 48 mm and a travel of 240 mm. The rear suspension is a swing arm with a monoshock from WP, also with a travel of 240 mm. In comparison, the KTM 1090 Adventure 2017 has a front suspension with an upside-down telescopic fork from WP, with a smaller diameter of 43 mm and a travel of 185 mm. The rear suspension is a swing arm with a monoshock from WP, with a travel of 190 mm.

In terms of chassis, both bikes have chromium-molybdenum frames. However, the KTM 790 Adventure R 2020 has a tubular, load-bearing engine frame type, while the KTM 1090 Adventure 2017 has a tubular frame type. The rake and trail measurements also differ slightly, with the KTM 790 Adventure R 2020 having a rake of 63.7 degrees and a trail of 110.4 mm, and the KTM 1090 Adventure 2017 having a rake of 64 degrees and a trail of 120 mm.

KTM 790 Adventure R 2020

Both bikes have double disk brakes at the front, and they come equipped with advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS, riding modes, and traction control.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the KTM 790 Adventure R 2020 has a front tire diameter of 21 inches and a rear tire width of 150 mm with a diameter of 18 inches. It has a wheelbase of 1528 mm and a seat height of 880 mm. The dry weight of the bike, with ABS, is 189 kg, and it has a fuel tank capacity of 20 liters. On the other hand, the KTM 1090 Adventure 2017 has a front tire diameter of 19 inches and a rear tire width of 150 mm with a diameter of 17 inches. It has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1560 mm and a lower seat height of 850 mm. The dry weight of the bike, with ABS, is 205 kg, and it has a larger fuel tank capacity of 23 liters.

In terms of strengths, the KTM 790 Adventure R 2020 offers a high-quality chassis that allows for a wide range of use. Its engine provides excellent running culture, rich torque, and well-balanced power. The bike also features an easy-to-read display and a practical rally electronics package. Despite its radical chassis design, it remains stable, maneuverable, and suitable for everyday road use.

KTM 1090 Adventure 2017

On the other hand, the KTM 1090 Adventure 2017 has a very powerful and refined engine with a wide rev range. It offers performance modes, the ability to switch off ABS, and adjustable traction control. The bike has agile and safe handling, adjustable ergonomics, a height-adjustable windshield, and a comparatively low weight. Additionally, it is priced lower than the KTM 790 Adventure R 2020.

In terms of weaknesses, the KTM 790 Adventure R 2020 does not come standard with a quickshifter, and the indicator switch can be a little fiddly. The seat is also slightly more uncomfortable on long tours compared to the standard model.

The KTM 1090 Adventure 2017, on the other hand, may seem outdated in terms of its aesthetics when compared to the newer 1290 Super Adventures. Additionally, its suspension fork is not adjustable.

In conclusion, both the KTM 790 Adventure R 2020 and the KTM 1090 Adventure 2017 are capable enduro motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The 790 Adventure R offers a high-quality chassis, a well-rounded engine, and practical features, while the 1090 Adventure provides a powerful engine, adjustable features, and a lower price point. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.