KTM 690 Duke 2008 vs. Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016

KTM 690 Duke 2008

KTM 690 Duke 2008

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016

Loading...

Pregled - KTM 690 Duke 2008 vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016

The KTM 690 Duke 2008 and the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016 takes the lead with its 106 HP engine, compared to the KTM 690 Duke 2008's 65 HP engine. The Triumph's three-cylinder engine provides a livelier performance and a distinct Tyrolean sound, while the KTM's single-cylinder engine is significantly weaker. This results in the Triumph offering a more exhilarating ride and better acceleration.

Both bikes feature liquid cooling systems, ensuring optimal performance even during long rides. This feature helps to prevent overheating and ensures a consistent engine temperature. Additionally, both models have high-quality components and strong braking systems, providing excellent stopping power and safety.

KTM 690 Duke 2008

KTM 690 Duke 2008

In terms of dimensions and weights, the KTM 690 Duke 2008 has a longer wheelbase of 1472 mm, compared to the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016's 1410 mm wheelbase. This longer wheelbase contributes to the KTM's stability, making it a reliable choice for riders who prioritize stability and control. However, the Triumph's shorter wheelbase allows for extremely agile handling, making it a nimble and responsive bike.

The seat height of the KTM 690 Duke 2008 is 865 mm, while the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016 has a lower seat height of 800 mm. This lower seat height on the Triumph makes it more accessible for riders with shorter inseams or those who prefer a lower riding position.

In terms of fuel tank capacity, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016 has a larger tank, holding 17.4 liters of fuel compared to the KTM 690 Duke 2008's 13.5 liters. This larger fuel tank allows for longer rides without the need for frequent refueling.

In terms of strengths, the KTM 690 Duke 2008 boasts a stable frame, relatively low overall weight, good chassis, and high-quality components. These features contribute to its excellent handling and make it a joy to ride. On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016 offers an extremely agile handling, low weight, adjustable chassis, and good brakes. These strengths make it a nimble and responsive bike, perfect for riders who prioritize maneuverability.

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016

However, the KTM 690 Duke 2008 does have some weaknesses. Its single-cylinder engine is significantly weaker compared to the Triumph's three-cylinder engine, resulting in less power and acceleration. Additionally, the KTM may offer somewhat less comfort compared to the Triumph.

On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016 has a weakness in terms of its exhaust. Some riders have reported that the exhaust can be somewhat loud in the long run, which may be a concern for those who prefer a quieter ride.

In conclusion, while both the KTM 690 Duke 2008 and the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016 offer exciting riding experiences, they have distinct differences. The Triumph excels in terms of engine power, agility, and adjustability, while the KTM offers stability, a strong frame, and good handling. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Tehnične specifikacije KTM 690 Duke 2008 v primerjavi z Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016

KTM 690 Duke 2008
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016
Pokaži vse
Samo enako
Razlike
KTM 690 Duke 2008
KTM 690 Duke 2008
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

KTM 690 Duke 2008

KTM 690 Duke 2008

Ali je toliko ljudi, ki ne potrebujejo 100 KM za stabilizacijo svojega ega? Mislim, da je bila pri prejšnjih enovaljnih modelih vedno težava v zasnovi in ne v pomanjkanju moči. Duku je uspelo, da je tudi kot majhen enovaljnik videti zelo kakovostno.

Stabilen okvir

razmeroma majhna skupna masa

dobro podvozje

kakovostne komponente

močan zavorni sistem

vodljivost.

Bistveno šibkejši enovaljni motor

nekoliko manj udobja

nekoliko manj moči.

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016

Triumph Street Tripel R je znan kot izjemno živahno golo kolo, ki je izjemno zabavno na podeželskih cestah. Toda mali R-Streety se odlično znajde tudi na dirkališču in vam ne gre na živce z gobčastim podvozjem ali premajhno močjo. Tudi zavorni sistem z dvema 310-milimetrskima diskoma in spredaj radialno nameščenimi Nissinovimi štiribatnimi čeljusti je tako zmogljiv, kot bi pričakovali od zelo, zelo športnega motocikla, ki se v veliki meri uporablja tudi na podeželskih cestah ali v vsakdanjem življenju.

Živahen motor s tirolskim zvokom

izjemno okretno upravljanje

majhna masa

prepoznaven videz

nastavljivo podvozje

dobre zavore.

nekoliko glasen izpuh na dolgi rok

Primerjava povprečnih tržnih cen KTM 690 Duke vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R

There are a few key differences between a KTM 690 Duke 2008 and a Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016. It takes less time to sell a KTM 690 Duke with 62 days compared to 85 days for a Triumph Street Triple 675 R. Since model year 2008 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the KTM 690 Duke and 16 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R since model year 2009. The first review for the KTM 690 Duke was published on 9/28/2007 and now has more than 14,800 views. This compares to more than 13,000 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple 675 R published on 7/20/2008.

Cena KTM 690 Duke

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Cena Triumph Street Triple 675 R

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Druge primerjave

Partner platforme 1000PS

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen