Husaberg TE 300 2012 vs. Husqvarna TE 300 2024

The Husaberg TE 300 2012 and the Husqvarna TE 300 2024 are both enduro motorcycles with similar technical specifications. They have the same bore and stroke measurements, starter type, number of cylinders, and engine displacement. Both models also feature upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension and WP brand for both the front and rear suspensions.

However, there are some notable differences between the two models. The Husaberg TE 300 2012 has a steel frame, while the Husqvarna TE 300 2024 has a chromium-molybdenum frame. The frame type of the Husqvarna is a double cradle, central tube, which provides a practical chassis setup for a wide range of uses. This gives the Husqvarna a robust overall appearance and unbeatable balance between handling, weight, and performance.

Husaberg TE 300 2012

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Husqvarna TE 300 2024 has a slightly longer wheelbase compared to the Husaberg TE 300 2012. The seat height of the Husqvarna is also lower, providing better ergonomics in the saddle and more room to move on the bike. However, the Husqvarna has a slightly higher dry weight compared to the Husaberg.

The fuel tank capacity of the Husqvarna TE 300 2024 is smaller than that of the Husaberg TE 300 2012. The Husqvarna has an 8.5-liter fuel tank, while the Husaberg has an 11-liter capacity. This means that the Husqvarna may require more frequent refueling during long rides.

When it comes to strengths, the Husaberg TE 300 2012 is praised for its wide range of applications and simple but solid two-stroke technology. On the other hand, the Husqvarna TE 300 2024 is commended for its practical chassis setup, great traction, precise lines, low vibration level in the saddle, and robust overall appearance. It also offers very practical details, low weight, great ergonomics in the saddle, and a high-quality chassis. The Husqvarna also has an unbeatable balance between handling, weight, and performance, with a 2-stroke engine that has excellent engine tuning and running culture. It performs exceptionally well on steep slopes, with good traction and surprisingly low tendency to wheelie.

Husqvarna TE 300 2024

In terms of weaknesses, the Husaberg TE 300 2012 does not have any listed weaknesses. On the other hand, the Husqvarna TE 300 2024 has a few weaknesses mentioned. The plastics in the boot area can quickly look worn, and the prices of the Husqvarna range are considered to be on the expensive side. Additionally, the recessed grip on the seat is positioned too far forward, and the stand can be a bit fiddly to fold out. Some riders also find the Husqvarna to be tiring to ride on longer passages.

Overall, both the Husaberg TE 300 2012 and the Husqvarna TE 300 2024 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two would depend on individual preferences and priorities, such as the desired chassis setup, ergonomics, and budget.