KTM 390 Duke 2017 vs. Yamaha XJ6 2009

KTM 390 Duke 2017

KTM 390 Duke 2017

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Loading...

Pregled - KTM 390 Duke 2017 vs Yamaha XJ6 2009

The KTM 390 Duke 2017 and the Yamaha XJ6 2009 are both naked bikes that offer unique features and characteristics.

In terms of engine power, the Yamaha XJ6 2009 has a clear advantage with 78 HP compared to the KTM 390 Duke 2017's 44 HP. The Yamaha also has a higher torque of 59.7 Nm compared to the KTM's 35 Nm. This means that the Yamaha XJ6 2009 will provide a more powerful and responsive ride, especially in terms of acceleration and top speed.

The KTM 390 Duke 2017, on the other hand, has a single cylinder engine, while the Yamaha XJ6 2009 has a four-cylinder engine. This difference in cylinder configuration affects the overall performance and smoothness of the ride. The Yamaha's four-cylinder engine provides a smoother power delivery and a more refined performance compared to the KTM's single-cylinder engine.

Both bikes have liquid cooling systems, which ensure optimal engine temperature and performance. This is particularly important for long rides or in hot weather conditions.

KTM 390 Duke 2017

KTM 390 Duke 2017

In terms of suspension, the KTM 390 Duke 2017 features an Upside-Down telescopic fork, while the Yamaha XJ6 2009 has a telescopic fork. The Upside-Down fork on the KTM provides better handling and stability, especially during aggressive riding or cornering.

The chassis of the KTM 390 Duke 2017 is made of chromium-molybdenum, which is known for its strength and lightweight properties. This contributes to the bike's low weight and nimble handling. The Yamaha XJ6 2009, on the other hand, has a steel frame with a double cradle design. While this frame provides good stability and durability, it may add some weight to the bike.

Both bikes have 17-inch front and rear tires, which offer good grip and stability on the road. The wheelbase of the KTM 390 Duke 2017 is slightly shorter at 1367 mm compared to the Yamaha XJ6 2009's 1440 mm. This shorter wheelbase contributes to the KTM's agility and maneuverability, making it easier to handle in tight corners or city traffic.

In terms of seat height, the KTM 390 Duke 2017 has a higher seat height of 830 mm compared to the Yamaha XJ6 2009's 785 mm. This may be a factor to consider for riders with shorter inseams or those who prefer a lower seating position.

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Yamaha XJ6 2009

The fuel tank capacity of the KTM 390 Duke 2017 is 13.4 liters, while the Yamaha XJ6 2009 has a larger capacity of 17.3 liters. This means that the Yamaha will have a longer range before needing to refuel, which can be advantageous for longer rides or touring.

In terms of strengths, the KTM 390 Duke 2017 offers a sporty seating position, low weight, TFT display, and a sharp appearance. These features contribute to a more aggressive and dynamic riding experience. On the other hand, the Yamaha XJ6 2009 is praised for its rider-friendly performance characteristics, optimal clutch, playful and lighter handling, seat comfort, and individual look. These strengths make the Yamaha a more versatile and comfortable bike for various riding styles.

As for weaknesses, the KTM 390 Duke 2017 does not have any specific weaknesses mentioned. On the other hand, the Yamaha XJ6 2009 is noted to have design components that are not too demanding and a torque development that may not be as strong as some riders prefer.

In conclusion, the KTM 390 Duke 2017 and the Yamaha XJ6 2009 are both capable naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The KTM offers a sportier and more aggressive riding experience, while the Yamaha provides a more versatile and comfortable ride. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and intended use of the bike.

Tehnične specifikacije KTM 390 Duke 2017 v primerjavi z Yamaha XJ6 2009

KTM 390 Duke 2017
Yamaha XJ6 2009

Motor in pogonski sklop

IzvrtinaIzvrtina89 mmIzvrtina65.5 mm
GibGib60 mmGib44.5 mm
Moč motorjaMoč motorja44 KMMoč motorja78 KM
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji močiŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči9,500 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči10,000 min-1
NavorNavor35 NmNavor59.7 Nm
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoruŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru7,250 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru8,500 min-1
Kompresijsko razmerjeKompresijsko razmerje12.6 Kompresijsko razmerje12.2
Tip sklopkeTip sklopkeVečdelna sklopka v oljni kopeliTip sklopkeVečdelna sklopka v oljni kopeli
Prenos močiPrenos močiVerigaPrenos močiVeriga
CilindriCilindri1Cilindri4
GibiGibiŠtiritaktniGibiŠtiritaktni
HlajenjeHlajenjetekočinaHlajenjetekočina
Gibna prostorninaGibna prostornina373.2 cm3Gibna prostornina600 cm3

Sprednje vzmetenje

Sprednje vzmetenjeSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske viliceSprednje vzmetenjeTeleskopske vilice

Podvozje

OkvirOkvirKrom-molibdenOkvirJeklo
Tip okvirjaTip okvirjaCevastTip okvirjaDvojni okvir

Sprednje zavore

VrstaVrstaEnojni kolutVrstaDvojni kolut

Zadnje zavore

VrstaVrstaKolutVrstaKolut

Mere in mase

Premer sprednje pnevmatikePremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcev
Premer zadnje pnevmatikePremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcev
Medosna razdaljaMedosna razdalja1,367 mmMedosna razdalja1,440 mm
Višina sedežaVišina sedeža830 mmVišina sedeža785 mm
Prostornina posode za gorivoProstornina posode za gorivo13.4 lProstornina posode za gorivo17.3 l
Skladnost z dovoljenjemSkladnost z dovoljenjemA2Skladnost z dovoljenjemA

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

KTM 390 Duke 2017

KTM 390 Duke 2017

It's actually incredible how much fun you can have with less than 50 hp. The KTM 390 Duke is a little fun cannon that you won't find anywhere else in a hurry. Its sporty set-up with the front-wheel-oriented seating position makes it a true cornering predator - you don't need any more in the angular gear. The sharp looks and the TFT display give it a very high-class appearance.

Sporty seating position

low weight

TFT display

sharp appearance

nix

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Kljub skupni osnovi je XJ videti veliko mlajši in agresivnejši. Motor srednjega razreda, ki vam nikakor ne daje občutka srednjega razreda. Razen nihajne ročice je motorno kolo videti precej kakovostno in kul. Motocikel je nekoliko lažji za upravljanje kot Diversion.

vozniku prijazne zmogljivosti

optimalna sklopka

igrivo, lažje upravljanje

udobje sedeža

individualen videz

mladosten

agresiven

visokokakovosten.

Oblikovne komponente niso preveč zahtevne

razvoj navora

Primerjava povprečnih tržnih cen KTM 390 Duke vs Yamaha XJ6

There are a few key differences between a KTM 390 Duke 2017 and a Yamaha XJ6 2009. In terms of price, the actual average price of a KTM 390 Duke 2017 is about 3% higher. A KTM 390 Duke 2017 experiences a loss of 130 USD in one year and 310 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 200 USD and 20 USD for a Yamaha XJ6 2009. Compared to Yamaha XJ6 2009 there are more KTM 390 Duke 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 8 compared to 6. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha XJ6 with 31 days compared to 66 days for the KTM 390 Duke. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 33 reviews for the KTM 390 Duke and 4 reviews for the Yamaha XJ6 since model year 2009. The first review for the KTM 390 Duke was published on 11/12/2012 and now has more than 26,300 views. This compares to more than 21,900 views for the first review on Yamaha XJ6 published on 11/13/2008.

Cena KTM 390 Duke

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Cena Yamaha XJ6

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Druge primerjave

Partner platforme 1000PS

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH