Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007 vs. Yamaha MT-07 2017

Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007

Yamaha MT-07 2017
Pregled - Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007 vs Yamaha MT-07 2017
The Yamaha FZ6-N S2 model year 2007 and the Yamaha MT-07 model year 2017 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007 has a higher output with 98 HP compared to the Yamaha MT-07 2017 which has 75 HP. This means that the FZ6-N S2 may offer better acceleration and top speed capabilities.
The number of cylinders also differs between the two models, with the FZ6-N S2 having 4 cylinders while the MT-07 has 2 cylinders. More cylinders generally provide smoother power delivery and better torque, so the FZ6-N S2 may have an advantage in this aspect.

Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007
Both bikes have liquid cooling systems, which help to maintain optimal engine temperature during operation. This can improve overall performance and reliability.
In terms of displacement, the FZ6-N S2 has a smaller engine size at 600cc compared to the MT-07's 689cc. A larger displacement generally results in more power and torque, so the MT-07 may have an advantage in this area.
When it comes to dimensions and weights, the FZ6-N S2 has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1440mm compared to the MT-07's 1400mm. A longer wheelbase can provide better stability at high speeds. The seat height of the FZ6-N S2 is slightly lower at 795mm compared to the MT-07's 805mm. This may make the FZ6-N S2 more accessible to riders with shorter inseams. However, the FZ6-N S2 has a larger fuel tank capacity at 19.4 liters compared to the MT-07's 14 liters. This means that the FZ6-N S2 may have a longer range before needing to refuel.

Yamaha MT-07 2017
In terms of strengths, the FZ6-N S2 2007 is praised for its beautiful appearance, one-piece cast brake calipers, high-quality anodized dip tubes, FZ1 cockpits, brakes, and optimum seating position. On the other hand, the MT-07 2017 is commended for its great motor, easy to read display, and low price.
However, there are also weaknesses to consider. The FZ6-N S2 2007 has a surcharge to the standard model, which may impact its affordability. Additionally, some riders find the engine to be weak in the lower rev range. On the other hand, the MT-07 2017 has been criticized for having a chassis that is too soft, potentially affecting its handling and stability.
Overall, the choice between the Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007 and the Yamaha MT-07 2017 will depend on individual preferences and priorities. The FZ6-N S2 may appeal to riders looking for a more powerful and stable bike, while the MT-07 may be a more budget-friendly option with a strong motor.
Tehnične specifikacije Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007 v primerjavi z Yamaha MT-07 2017
Primerjava prednosti in slabosti
Primerjava prednosti in slabosti
Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007

Yamaha FZ6-N Spec II je s svojimi zmogljivostmi vsekakor upravičila svoj videz. Zelo vozen motocikel, na katerem se izkušeni vozniki kljub temu ne bi smeli dolgočasiti.
Yamaha MT-07 2017

Tudi po treh letih je Yamaha MT-07 še vedno priljubljena pri javnosti. Takšnega razmerja med ceno in zmogljivostjo ne prekaša nihče drug. Dvocilindrski motor je močan, vendar ga je mogoče pri nizkih vrtljajih zelo nežno dozirati. Tudi zaslon je eden najboljših v tem razredu, z dobro berljivostjo. Razočara le podvozje. Pri športnem načinu vožnje je preprosto premehko, zaradi česar se lahko MT-07 začne zibati.
Primerjava povprečnih tržnih cen Yamaha FZ6-N S2 vs Yamaha MT-07
There are a few key differences between a Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007 and a Yamaha MT-07 2017. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha FZ6-N S2 with 59 days compared to 83 days for a Yamaha MT-07. Since model year 2007 1000PS.de editors have written 6 reviews for the Yamaha FZ6-N S2 and 69 reviews for the Yamaha MT-07 since model year 2013. The first review for the Yamaha FZ6-N S2 was published on 10/13/2006 and now has more than 31,700 views. This compares to more than 12,600 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-07 published on 11/4/2013.