KTM 390 Duke 2016 vs. BMW G 310 R 2017

KTM 390 Duke 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2016

BMW G 310 R 2017

BMW G 310 R 2017

Loading...

Pregled - KTM 390 Duke 2016 vs BMW G 310 R 2017

The KTM 390 Duke 2016 and the BMW G 310 R 2017 are both popular naked bikes in the market, each with its own set of strengths and weaknesses.

Starting with the technical specifications, the KTM 390 Duke 2016 boasts an engine power of 44 HP and a torque of 35 Nm, while the BMW G 310 R 2017 offers slightly lower figures with 34 HP of engine power and 28 Nm of torque. Both bikes have a single cylinder and a displacement of around 300-400 ccm. In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front. The KTM 390 Duke 2016 has a chromium-molybdenum frame, while the BMW G 310 R 2017 has a steel frame. Both bikes have a tubular frame type and single disk brakes at the front. The dimensions and weights of the two bikes are quite similar, with both having a front tire width of 110 mm, a front tire diameter of 17 inches, a rear tire width of 150 mm, a rear tire diameter of 17 inches, and a wheelbase of around 1370 mm. The seat height of the KTM 390 Duke 2016 is slightly higher at 800 mm compared to the BMW G 310 R 2017's seat height of 785 mm. The KTM 390 Duke 2016 also has a lower kerb weight of 139 kg compared to the BMW G 310 R 2017's 158.5 kg. Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of 11 liters.

KTM 390 Duke 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2016

Now let's discuss the strengths of each bike. The KTM 390 Duke 2016 is known for its low weight, which contributes to its agility and maneuverability. It also offers sufficient power for an enjoyable riding experience, making it a fun bike to ride. Additionally, the KTM 390 Duke 2016 has a relatively low fuel consumption, which is a desirable feature for cost-conscious riders. On the other hand, the BMW G 310 R 2017 is praised for its smooth response, providing a comfortable and enjoyable ride. It also has a low seat height, making it more accessible for riders of different heights. The BMW G 310 R 2017 also stands out with its pretty design, appealing to riders who value aesthetics. Lastly, the bike has a throaty sound, adding to the overall riding experience.

BMW G 310 R 2017

BMW G 310 R 2017

However, both bikes have their weaknesses as well. The KTM 390 Duke 2016 has been criticized for its sluggish clutch, which can be a drawback for riders looking for quick and smooth gear changes. Additionally, some riders find the small geometry of the bike to be uncomfortable, especially for taller individuals. On the other hand, the BMW G 310 R 2017 has been noted to have individual components that look cheap, which can affect the overall perception of the bike's quality.

In conclusion, the KTM 390 Duke 2016 and the BMW G 310 R 2017 are both solid choices in the naked bike category, each with its own unique strengths and weaknesses. The KTM 390 Duke 2016 offers low weight, sufficient power, high fun factor, and low consumption, while the BMW G 310 R 2017 provides a smooth response, low seat height, pretty design, and a throaty sound. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Tehnične specifikacije KTM 390 Duke 2016 v primerjavi z BMW G 310 R 2017

KTM 390 Duke 2016
BMW G 310 R 2017

Motor in pogonski sklop

IzvrtinaIzvrtina89 mmIzvrtina80 mm
GibGib60 mmGib62 mm
Moč motorjaMoč motorja44 KMMoč motorja34 KM
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji močiŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči9,500 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči9,500 min-1
NavorNavor35 NmNavor28 Nm
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoruŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru7,250 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru7,500 min-1
Kompresijsko razmerjeKompresijsko razmerje12.6 Kompresijsko razmerje10.6
ZaganjalnikZaganjalnikElektričniZaganjalnikElektrični
Tip sklopkeTip sklopkeVečdelna sklopka v oljni kopeliTip sklopkeVečdelna sklopka v oljni kopeli
Prenos močiPrenos močiVerigaPrenos močiVeriga
CilindriCilindri1Cilindri1
GibiGibiŠtiritaktniGibiŠtiritaktni
Gibna prostorninaGibna prostornina373.2 cm3Gibna prostornina313 cm3

Sprednje vzmetenje

Sprednje vzmetenjeSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske viliceSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske vilice

Zadnje vzmetenje

Pritrditev amortizerjaPritrditev amortizerjaneposredniPritrditev amortizerjaneposredni

Podvozje

OkvirOkvirKrom-molibdenOkvirJeklo
Tip okvirjaTip okvirjaCevastTip okvirjaCevast

Sprednje zavore

VrstaVrstaEnojni kolutVrstaEnojni kolut

Zadnje zavore

VrstaVrstaKolutVrstaKolut

Mere in mase

Širina sprednje pnevmatikeŠirina sprednje pnevmatike110 mmŠirina sprednje pnevmatike110 mm
Višina sprednje pnevmatikeVišina sprednje pnevmatike70 %Višina sprednje pnevmatike70 %
Premer sprednje pnevmatikePremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcev
Širina zadnje pnevmatikeŠirina zadnje pnevmatike150 mmŠirina zadnje pnevmatike150 mm
Višina zadnje pnevmatikeVišina zadnje pnevmatike60 %Višina zadnje pnevmatike60 %
Premer zadnje pnevmatikePremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcev
Medosna razdaljaMedosna razdalja1,367 mmMedosna razdalja1,374 mm
Višina sedežaVišina sedeža800 mmVišina sedeža785 mm
Lastna masa (z ABS)Lastna masa (z ABS)139 kgLastna masa (z ABS)158.5 kg
Prostornina posode za gorivoProstornina posode za gorivo11 lProstornina posode za gorivo11 l
Skladnost z dovoljenjemSkladnost z dovoljenjemA2Skladnost z dovoljenjemA2

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

KTM 390 Duke 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2016

KTM 390 Duke je res dober kompromis med športnostjo, razumnostjo, udobjem vožnje, zabavo in ceno. Najboljše od vsega: sploh ni videti, da gre za kompromis, temveč da je pripravljen za dirkanje.

Majhna teža

zadostna moč

visok faktor zabave

nizka poraba

Počasna sklopka

majhna geometrija

BMW G 310 R 2017

BMW G 310 R 2017

BMW G 310 R se ponaša z lahkotnim upravljanjem, ki ne bi smelo preobremeniti nobenega začetnika. Zaradi odlične odzivnosti enovaljnika ga je enostavno upravljati, nizka višina sedeža pa zagotavlja varno oporo na semaforjih. Zaradi stroškov so v nekaterih ovinkih varčevali, kar žal postane tudi vidno. V primerjavi s konkurenco pa tudi kakovost izdelave ni na enaki ravni.

Nemoten odziv

nizka višina sedeža

lep dizajn

glasen zvok

Posamezne komponente so videti poceni

Primerjava povprečnih tržnih cen KTM 390 Duke vs BMW G 310 R

There are a few key differences between a KTM 390 Duke 2016 and a BMW G 310 R 2017. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 9. It takes less time to sell a KTM 390 Duke with 60 days compared to 75 days for a BMW G 310 R. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 33 reviews for the KTM 390 Duke and 16 reviews for the BMW G 310 R since model year 2016. The first review for the KTM 390 Duke was published on 11/12/2012 and now has more than 26,300 views. This compares to more than 28,500 views for the first review on BMW G 310 R published on 10/7/2015.

Cena KTM 390 Duke

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Cena BMW G 310 R

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Druge primerjave

Partner platforme 1000PS

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH