Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 vs. Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013
Yamaha FZ-8N 2010
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013
Pregled - Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013
In terms of engine power, both the Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 and the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 have the same output of 106 HP. However, the Yamaha FZ-8N has a higher torque rating of 82 Nm compared to the Triumph Street Triple's 68 Nm. This means that the Yamaha FZ-8N may have better acceleration and pulling power.
The Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 has a 4-cylinder engine, while the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 has a 3-cylinder engine. This difference in cylinder configuration may result in a different engine sound and power delivery characteristics.
Both bikes have liquid cooling systems, which help to maintain optimal engine temperature during operation.
In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks in the front. This type of suspension provides better stability and control during cornering and braking.
Yamaha FZ-8N 2010
The Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 has a Deltabox frame type, while the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 has a Twin Tube frame type. The Deltabox frame is known for its rigidity and strength, providing a stable and precise handling experience. The Twin Tube frame, on the other hand, may offer a more balanced and responsive ride.
In terms of tire dimensions, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths of 120 mm and 180 mm, respectively. The tire diameter is also the same at 17 inches. This means that both bikes have similar tire profiles, which may result in similar handling characteristics.
The Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1460 mm compared to the Triumph Street Triple's 1410 mm. A longer wheelbase generally contributes to better stability at high speeds.
In terms of seat height, the Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 has a seat height of 815 mm, while the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 has a slightly lower seat height of 800 mm. This may make the Triumph Street Triple more accessible to riders with shorter inseams.
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013
The Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 has a higher kerb weight of 211 kg compared to the Triumph Street Triple's 183 kg. A lighter weight generally contributes to better agility and maneuverability.
Both bikes have similar fuel tank capacities, with the Yamaha FZ-8N having a capacity of 17 liters and the Triumph Street Triple having a slightly larger capacity of 17.4 liters.
In terms of strengths, the Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 is praised for its sporty engine performance, beefy appearance, pleasant driving feel, and relatively fast speed. On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 is praised for its taut, playful chassis, agile handling, low weight, powerful brakes, and comfort offered.
As for weaknesses, the Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 is criticized for its exhaust canister, which is seen as visually unappealing. The Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 is noted for its slightly brute brake application towards the end, which may require some adjustment for smoother braking.
Tehnične specifikacije Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 v primerjavi z Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013
Primerjava prednosti in slabosti
Primerjava prednosti in slabosti
Yamaha FZ-8N 2010
V skladu s filozofsko-optimističnim stališčem, da kozarec ni napol prazen, temveč napol poln, se vam pri Yamahi ni treba odločati PROTI dvema, temveč ZA enega. V vsakem primeru ima FZ8 dovolj potenciala, da postane zlata sredina v krogu motociklov s prostim telesom.
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013
If you're looking for a lively naked bike in the mid-range segment that's especially fun for sporty rides on country roads, the Street Triple 675 R is the perfect choice. Whether the manageable surcharge for the R pays off should be decided according to whether you really want to adjust the chassis or leave it in the well-chosen basic setup anyway.
Primerjava povprečnih tržnih cen Yamaha FZ-8N vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R
There are a few key differences between a Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 and a Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple 675 R with 52 days compared to 57 days for the Yamaha FZ-8N. Since model year 2010 1000PS.de editors have written 11 reviews for the Yamaha FZ-8N and 16 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R since model year 2009. The first review for the Yamaha FZ-8N was published on 1/27/2010 and now has more than 8,200 views. This compares to more than 13,000 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple 675 R published on 7/20/2008.
