Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005 vs. Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

The Husqvarna SM 450 R and the Husaberg FS 650 E, both from the 2005 model year, are two supermoto bikes that offer different strengths and weaknesses in terms of technical specifications and overall performance.

Starting with the technical specifications, the Husqvarna SM 450 R is equipped with a 449cc single-cylinder engine that delivers 50 horsepower. On the other hand, the Husaberg FS 650 E features a larger 628cc single-cylinder engine that produces 65 horsepower. This means that the Husaberg has a more powerful engine, providing a higher level of performance and acceleration.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Husqvarna SM 450 R has a wheelbase of 1495mm, while the Husaberg FS 650 E has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1481mm. The seat height of the Husqvarna is 885mm, whereas the Husaberg has a slightly lower seat height of 870mm. When it comes to dry weight, the Husaberg is lighter at 112kg compared to the 121kg of the Husqvarna. This makes the Husaberg more agile and maneuverable, especially in tight corners and urban environments.

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Moving on to the strengths of each bike, the Husqvarna SM 450 R is praised for its supermoto geometry, which enhances its handling and cornering abilities. Its chassis is also highly regarded for its agility and responsiveness. Additionally, the Husqvarna offers a high-performance engine that is known for its rev-happy nature, providing an exhilarating riding experience.

On the other hand, the Husaberg FS 650 E is described as uncompromising racing iron, indicating its focus on performance and speed. It is also praised for its tough sound, which adds to the overall riding experience. Furthermore, the Husaberg is lighter in weight, making it easier to handle and maneuver. Its engine power, chassis, braking, and handling are all considered strong points, highlighting its capabilities as a racing bike.

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The Husqvarna SM 450 R is criticized for its rancid-looking bicycle speedometer and its reliability, which may be a concern for some riders. It is also mentioned that the bike may not be suitable for everyday use, suggesting that it may not be the most practical choice for commuting or long-distance riding.

Similarly, the Husaberg FS 650 E has its drawbacks. It is noted that the noise, vibrations, and spontaneous engine overwhelming may be challenging for beginners, indicating that it may not be the most user-friendly option for inexperienced riders. Additionally, the price of the Husaberg is mentioned as a weakness, suggesting that it may be more expensive compared to other bikes in its class. The starting behavior and reliability of the bike are also mentioned as potential concerns.

In conclusion, the Husqvarna SM 450 R and the Husaberg FS 650 E have their own unique strengths and weaknesses. While the Husqvarna offers a nimble chassis and high performance, the Husaberg excels in terms of engine power, lightweight construction, and racing capabilities. However, both bikes have some reliability concerns and may not be suitable for beginners or everyday use.