Kawasaki Z900 RS Cafe 2018 vs. Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016

The Kawasaki Z900 RS Cafe 2018 and the Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016 are both naked bikes with a classic look and powerful engines. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine specifications, the Kawasaki Z900 RS Cafe 2018 is equipped with an in-line, liquid-cooled engine with a displacement of 948cc. It delivers a power output of 111 HP and a torque of 98.5 Nm. On the other hand, the Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016 features an in-line crankpin offset, liquid-cooled engine with a displacement of 1200cc. It produces a slightly lower power output of 97 HP but a higher torque of 112 Nm. Both bikes have fuel injection systems and offer a smooth and responsive ride.

When it comes to suspension, the Kawasaki Z900 RS Cafe 2018 is equipped with an upside-down telescopic fork at the front and a swing arm with a monoshock at the rear. The suspension can be adjusted for preload and rebound, offering a customizable riding experience. In comparison, the Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016 features a telescopic fork at the front and a swing arm with dual shocks at the rear. The rear suspension only offers preload adjustment. While both bikes provide a comfortable ride, the Kawasaki Z900 RS Cafe 2018's suspension setup allows for more precise tuning.

Kawasaki Z900 RS Cafe 2018

In terms of chassis, both bikes feature steel frames. However, the Kawasaki Z900 RS Cafe 2018 has a tubular frame, while the Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016 has a central tube frame. The choice of frame design affects the overall rigidity and handling characteristics of the bikes.

When it comes to braking, both bikes are equipped with double disc brakes at the front. However, the Kawasaki Z900 RS Cafe 2018 has larger diameter discs (300mm) and four-piston calipers, providing excellent stopping power. The Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016, on the other hand, has slightly smaller diameter discs (310mm) and double piston calipers. Both bikes are equipped with ABS for enhanced safety.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Kawasaki Z900 RS Cafe 2018 has a wider front tire (120mm) compared to the Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016 (120mm). However, the Thruxton has a wider rear tire (160mm) compared to the Z900 RS Cafe (180mm). The wheelbase of the Z900 RS Cafe is also longer (1470mm) compared to the Thruxton (1415mm). The seat height of the Z900 RS Cafe is slightly higher (820mm) compared to the Thruxton (805mm). Both bikes have similar fuel tank capacities, with the Z900 RS Cafe having a slightly larger capacity (17 liters) compared to the Thruxton (14.5 liters).

Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki Z900 RS Cafe 2018 offers a beautiful, classic, and high-quality look. It has balanced handling and a sporty riding feel thanks to its high-torque engine and sporty seating position. The bike also provides practical wind protection and offers a great sport tourer feeling paired with great looks. On the other hand, the Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016 boasts a powerful and finely tuned engine, an authentic look, and a genuine classic bike feel.

In terms of weaknesses, the Kawasaki Z900 RS Cafe 2018 lacks a shift assistant, which can be found on some other retro bikes in its class. It is also slightly heavier than other retro bikes in its class, which may affect its agility. Additionally, some riders may find the seat a little too soft for long tours. The Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016, on the other hand, has a chassis that is clearly below that of the "R" model, resulting in moderate comfort. However, it compensates for this with a good sound that adds to the overall riding experience.

In conclusion, both the Kawasaki Z900 RS Cafe 2018 and the Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016 offer unique features and strengths. The Z900 RS Cafe excels in its classic and high-quality look, balanced handling, and sporty riding feel. On the other hand, the Thruxton stands out with its powerful engine, authentic look, and genuine classic bike feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on individual preferences and priorities.