BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs. Kawasaki Z900 2019

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Loading...

Pregled - BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs Kawasaki Z900 2019

The BMW S 1000 R 2016 and the Kawasaki Z900 2019 are both naked bikes that offer powerful performance and a comfortable riding experience. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine specifications, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 is equipped with a 999cc in-line four-cylinder engine that produces 160 horsepower and 112 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 2019 features a slightly smaller 948cc in-line four-cylinder engine that delivers 125.4 horsepower and 98.6 Nm of torque. While both bikes have four cylinders and similar engine types, the BMW offers more power and torque.

When it comes to suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension at the rear. The BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a monoshock rear shock absorber, while the Kawasaki Z900 2019 also utilizes a monoshock setup. Both bikes provide a comfortable and stable ride, with the BMW offering the additional feature of dynamic suspension as part of its advanced rider assistance systems.

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

In terms of chassis, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, while the Kawasaki Z900 2019 features a steel frame with a double cradle design. The choice of materials and frame design can affect the overall weight and handling characteristics of the bikes.

Both bikes are equipped with double disc brakes at the front, with four-piston calipers providing excellent stopping power. The BMW S 1000 R 2016 utilizes radial technology for its front brakes, while the Kawasaki Z900 2019 features petal technology. The choice of braking technology can influence the feel and performance of the brakes.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 190 mm, while the Kawasaki Z900 2019 has a slightly narrower rear tire width of 180 mm. The wheelbase of the BMW is 1439 mm, while the Kawasaki has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1450 mm. The seat height of the BMW is 814 mm, while the Kawasaki offers a slightly lower seat height of 795 mm. The kerb weight of the BMW is 207 kg with ABS, while the Kawasaki weighs slightly more at 210 kg with ABS.

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Kawasaki Z900 2019

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 is praised for its powerful and well-controllable engine, powerful braking system, and comfortable seating position. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 2019 is commended for its light and natural handling, high stability, silky engine with full pull from mid revs, high chassis transparency, and great feedback. The Z900 also offers a sitting position with a feel-good factor and a fair price.

However, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 does have some weaknesses, including expensive optional extras and a hard chassis. The Kawasaki Z900 2019 has its own weaknesses, such as a TFT display mounted too low, cumbersome menu operation, and rear view mirrors that offer modest visibility.

In conclusion, both the BMW S 1000 R 2016 and the Kawasaki Z900 2019 are powerful naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. The BMW excels in terms of engine power and braking performance, while the Kawasaki offers a lighter and more agile handling experience. Both bikes have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between the two ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Tehnične specifikacije BMW S 1000 R 2016 v primerjavi z Kawasaki Z900 2019

BMW S 1000 R 2016
Kawasaki Z900 2019

Motor in pogonski sklop

Vrsta motorjaVrsta motorjaVrstniVrsta motorjaVrstni
IzvrtinaIzvrtina80 mmIzvrtina73.4 mm
GibGib49.7 mmGib56 mm
Moč motorjaMoč motorja160 KMMoč motorja125.4 KM
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji močiŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči11,000 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči9,500 min-1
NavorNavor112 NmNavor98.6 Nm
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoruŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru9,250 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru7,700 min-1
Kompresijsko razmerjeKompresijsko razmerje12 Kompresijsko razmerje11.8
Tip sklopkeTip sklopkeVečdelna sklopka v oljni kopeli, Preprečevanje poskakovanja kolesaTip sklopkeVečdelna sklopka v oljni kopeli
Prenos močiPrenos močiVerigaPrenos močiVeriga
Število prestavŠtevilo prestav6Število prestav6
CilindriCilindri4Cilindri4
GibiGibiŠtiritaktniGibiŠtiritaktni
Gibna prostorninaGibna prostornina999 cm3Gibna prostornina948 cm3

Sprednje vzmetenje

Sprednje vzmetenjeSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske viliceSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske vilice
PremerPremer46 mmPremer41 mm

Zadnje vzmetenje

VzmetenjeVzmetenjeVrtljivi drogVzmetenjeVrtljivi drog
AmortizerAmortizerEn blažilnikAmortizerEn blažilnik

Podvozje

OkvirOkvirAluminijOkvirJeklo
Tip okvirjaTip okvirjaDvojna cevTip okvirjaDvojni okvir

Sprednje zavore

VrstaVrstaDvojni kolutVrstaDvojni kolut
BatBatŠtirje batiBatŠtirje bati
TehnologijaTehnologijaRadialnaTehnologijaListnati

Zadnje zavore

VrstaVrstaKolutVrstaKolut
BatBatEn batBatEn bat

Sistemi za pomoč vozniku

Napredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomNapredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomDinamično vzmetenjeNapredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomABS

Mere in mase

Širina sprednje pnevmatikeŠirina sprednje pnevmatike120 mmŠirina sprednje pnevmatike120 mm
Višina sprednje pnevmatikeVišina sprednje pnevmatike70 %Višina sprednje pnevmatike70 %
Premer sprednje pnevmatikePremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcev
Širina zadnje pnevmatikeŠirina zadnje pnevmatike190 mmŠirina zadnje pnevmatike180 mm
Višina zadnje pnevmatikeVišina zadnje pnevmatike55 %Višina zadnje pnevmatike55 %
Premer zadnje pnevmatikePremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcev
DolžinaDolžina2,057 mmDolžina2,070 mm
ŠirinaŠirina845 mmŠirina820 mm
Medosna razdaljaMedosna razdalja1,439 mmMedosna razdalja1,450 mm
Višina sedežaVišina sedeža814 mmVišina sedeža795 mm
Lastna masa (z ABS)Lastna masa (z ABS)207 kgLastna masa (z ABS)210 kg
Skladnost z dovoljenjemSkladnost z dovoljenjemASkladnost z dovoljenjemA

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comfortable seating position

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Na srečo novi Kawasaki Z900 zaradi uporabe elektronike ni izgubil svojega značaja. Je in ostaja igriv naked bike srednjega razreda, ki hkrati odlično obvladuje živahen tempo na podeželski cesti. Užitek v vožnji in primernost za vsakdanjo uporabo sta visoka, zdaj nameščeni pripomočki za pomoč pri vožnji pa ponujajo plus pri varnosti. Vaši nasprotniki bodo odslej imeli res težko delo.

Lahka in naravna vodljivost z visoko stabilnostjo

svilnat motor s polno močjo od srednjih vrtljajev naprej

visoka preglednost podvozja, odlične povratne informacije

položaj sedenja z dobrim občutkom

ugodna cena

Prenizko nameščen zaslon TFT

okorno upravljanje menija

ogledala za vzvratno vožnjo zagotavljajo skromno vidljivost

Primerjava povprečnih tržnih cen BMW S 1000 R vs Kawasaki Z900

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2016 and a Kawasaki Z900 2019. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2016 is about 21% higher. A BMW S 1000 R 2016 experiences a loss of 380 USD in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 230 USD for a Kawasaki Z900 2019. Compared to Kawasaki Z900 2019 there are less BMW S 1000 R 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 40. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 69 days compared to 116 days for a Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 since model year 2017. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 93,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z900 published on 11/11/2016.

Cena BMW S 1000 R

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Cena Kawasaki Z900

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Druge primerjave

Partner platforme 1000PS

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH