KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013 vs. Kawasaki Z900 2017

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Loading...

Pregled - KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013 vs Kawasaki Z900 2017

The KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013 and the Kawasaki Z900 2017 are both powerful naked bikes with impressive specifications.

In terms of engine power, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013 takes the lead with 173 HP compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2017's 125.4 HP. This means that the KTM offers a more exhilarating and thrilling riding experience with its higher horsepower.

In terms of torque, the KTM also comes out on top with 144 Nm compared to the Kawasaki's 98.6 Nm. This means that the KTM has better low-end power and acceleration, making it more suitable for aggressive riding styles.

Both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks for their front suspension, ensuring a smooth and controlled ride. However, the KTM has the advantage of a chromium-molybdenum frame, which is known for its lightweight and high strength properties. The Kawasaki, on the other hand, has a steel frame, which may be slightly heavier but still provides good stability and durability.

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

When it comes to braking, both bikes feature four-piston front calipers for excellent stopping power. However, the KTM has the added advantage of radial, monoblock technology, which enhances braking performance even further. The Kawasaki, on the other hand, has petal brakes, which also provide good stopping power but may not be as advanced as the KTM's braking system.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, both bikes come equipped with ABS for added safety. However, the KTM also features traction control, which helps to prevent wheel spin and maintain stability during acceleration.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have similar front tire widths and diameters. However, the KTM has a wider rear tire width of 190 mm compared to the Kawasaki's 180 mm. This provides the KTM with better traction and stability during cornering.

The wheelbase of the KTM is also slightly longer at 1482 mm compared to the Kawasaki's 1450 mm. This contributes to the KTM's precise handling and stability at high speeds.

In terms of seat height, the KTM has a higher seat height of 835 mm compared to the Kawasaki's 795 mm. This may be a disadvantage for taller riders as it may result in a narrower knee angle. However, this can be easily remedied by ordering a different seat.

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

In terms of weight, the KTM is lighter at 189 kg compared to the Kawasaki's 210 kg. This makes the KTM more agile and easier to handle, especially in tight corners.

In terms of strengths, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013 offers precise handling, traction control, and a powerful engine. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 2017 boasts an ingenious nakedbike chassis, superb looks, and a well-tuned engine with perfectly balanced torque. It is also worth noting that the Kawasaki offers an optimum intersection of performance, price, and practical use.

As for weaknesses, the KTM's main drawback is its high price, which may be a deterrent for some buyers. On the other hand, the Kawasaki's narrow knee angle may be uncomfortable for taller riders, but this can be easily addressed by purchasing a different seat.

In conclusion, both the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013 and the Kawasaki Z900 2017 are impressive naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The KTM offers a more powerful engine and advanced features such as traction control, while the Kawasaki offers a well-balanced combination of performance, price, and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences and priorities.

Tehnične specifikacije KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013 v primerjavi z Kawasaki Z900 2017

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013
Kawasaki Z900 2017

Motor in pogonski sklop

IzvrtinaIzvrtina108 mmIzvrtina73.4 mm
GibGib71 mmGib56 mm
Moč motorjaMoč motorja173 KMMoč motorja125.4 KM
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji močiŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči8,870 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči9,500 min-1
NavorNavor144 NmNavor98.6 Nm
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoruŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru6,500 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru7,700 min-1
Kompresijsko razmerjeKompresijsko razmerje13.2 Kompresijsko razmerje11.8
Tip sklopkeTip sklopkePreprečevanje poskakovanja kolesaTip sklopkeVečdelna sklopka v oljni kopeli
Prenos močiPrenos močiVerigaPrenos močiVeriga
CilindriCilindri2Cilindri4
GibiGibiŠtiritaktniGibiŠtiritaktni
Gibna prostorninaGibna prostornina1,301 cm3Gibna prostornina948 cm3

Sprednje vzmetenje

Sprednje vzmetenjeSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske viliceSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske vilice

Podvozje

OkvirOkvirKrom-molibdenOkvirJeklo
Tip okvirjaTip okvirjaCevastTip okvirjaDvojni okvir

Sprednje zavore

BatBatŠtirje batiBatŠtirje bati
Pritrditev amortizerjaPritrditev amortizerjaFiksna čeljustPritrditev amortizerjaFiksna čeljust
TehnologijaTehnologijaRadialna, MonoblokTehnologijaListnati

Zadnje zavore

VrstaVrstaKolutVrstaKolut
BatBatDva bataBatEn bat

Sistemi za pomoč vozniku

Napredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomNapredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomABS, Nadzor zdrsavanja kolesNapredni sistemi za pomoč voznikomABS

Mere in mase

Širina sprednje pnevmatikeŠirina sprednje pnevmatike120 mmŠirina sprednje pnevmatike120 mm
Višina sprednje pnevmatikeVišina sprednje pnevmatike70 %Višina sprednje pnevmatike70 %
Premer sprednje pnevmatikePremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcev
Širina zadnje pnevmatikeŠirina zadnje pnevmatike190 mmŠirina zadnje pnevmatike180 mm
Višina zadnje pnevmatikeVišina zadnje pnevmatike55 %Višina zadnje pnevmatike55 %
Premer zadnje pnevmatikePremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcev
Medosna razdaljaMedosna razdalja1,482 mmMedosna razdalja1,450 mm
Višina sedežaVišina sedeža835 mmVišina sedeža795 mm
Lastna masa (z ABS)Lastna masa (z ABS)189 kgLastna masa (z ABS)210 kg
Skladnost z dovoljenjemSkladnost z dovoljenjemASkladnost z dovoljenjemA

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

With all the power and hard "Beast videos" from KTM, this horsepower monster is actually a 100% everyday bike for touring or going to work.

precise handling

traction control

powerful engine

High price

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

An incredibly well-designed motorbike. A lot of test work and attention to detail went into it. It has exactly the right power, exactly the right chassis and exactly the right look. An all-round successful naked bike that will make you happy for a long time. If you like, you can ride it simply and faithfully, but if you want, you can also ride it really fast and it wheels like hell. Great!

Ingenious nakedbike chassis

superb looks

engine responds super fine, revs up willingly and has a perfectly dimensioned torque

optimum intersection of performance, price and practical use

Knee angle very narrow for tall people (order another seat!)

Primerjava povprečnih tržnih cen KTM 1290 Super Duke R vs Kawasaki Z900

There are a few key differences between a KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013 and a Kawasaki Z900 2017. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Z900 with 85 days compared to 140 days for the KTM 1290 Super Duke R. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 65 reviews for the KTM 1290 Super Duke R and 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 since model year 2017. The first review for the KTM 1290 Super Duke R was published on 11/8/2012 and now has more than 4,900 views. This compares to more than 93,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z900 published on 11/11/2016.

Cena KTM 1290 Super Duke R

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Cena Kawasaki Z900

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Druge primerjave

Partner platforme 1000PS

LOUISContinental Motorradreifencalimoto GmbHSchuberthMotorex AG