Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017 vs. Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011
Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017
Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011
Pregled - Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017 vs Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011
The Suzuki V-Strom 1000 model year 2017 and the Suzuki V-Strom 650 model year 2011 are both enduro motorcycles that offer a range of features and capabilities.
Starting with the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017, it boasts a powerful engine with a bore of 100 mm and a stroke of 66 mm. This results in an engine power of 101 HP and torque of 101 Nm. The transmission is chain-driven, providing smooth and efficient power transfer. The displacement of the engine is 1037 ccm, which contributes to its overall performance.
In terms of suspension, the V-Strom 1000 2017 offers adjustable compression, preload, and rebound settings for the front suspension. The rear suspension also has adjustable preload and rebound. This allows riders to fine-tune the suspension to their preferences and riding conditions.
The chassis of the V-Strom 1000 2017 is made of aluminum and features a twin tube frame. This provides a balance of strength and weight, resulting in a stable and comfortable ride. The brakes on the front are double disk, offering strong stopping power.
Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017
In terms of dimensions and weights, the V-Strom 1000 2017 has a front tire diameter of 19 inches and a rear tire width of 150 mm with a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase is 1555 mm and the seat height is 850 mm. The kerb weight, including ABS, is 232 kg. The fuel tank capacity is 20 liters, providing a good range for long rides.
Some of the strengths of the V-Strom 1000 2017 include its powerful engine, good brakes with lean angle ABS, traction control, and stable yet comfortable chassis. It also offers good wind protection, making it suitable for touring. The instrument panel is complete with a gear indicator, and there is a 12-volt socket in the cockpit area for convenience. Hand protectors and an engine guard come as standard, and it is reasonably priced.
On the other hand, the Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011 has a slightly smaller engine with a bore of 81 mm and a stroke of 62.6 mm. This results in an engine power of 67 HP and torque of 60 Nm. The transmission is also chain-driven, providing efficient power transfer. The displacement of the engine is 645 ccm.
In terms of suspension, the V-Strom 650 2011 offers adjustable preload for both the front and rear suspension. This allows riders to customize the suspension to their preferences. The chassis is made of aluminum and features a twin-spar frame, providing strength and stability. The brakes on the front are double disk, offering strong and well-controllable stopping power.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the V-Strom 650 2011 has the same front tire diameter of 19 inches and rear tire width of 150 mm with a diameter of 17 inches as the V-Strom 1000 2017. The wheelbase and seat height are also the same at 1555 mm and 820 mm, respectively. The kerb weight, including ABS, is slightly lower at 220 kg. The fuel tank capacity is slightly higher at 22 liters.
Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011
Some of the strengths of the V-Strom 650 2011 include its relatively low overall weight, pleasant sound, positive ergonomics, and seat comfort. The brakes are strong and well-controllable, and it also comes with ABS. It is well-equipped for its time.
However, the V-Strom 650 2011 does have a weakness in that the engine tends to slow down with a passenger on long journeys.
In comparison, the V-Strom 1000 2017 has a more powerful engine and a wider range of features, making it better suited for touring and more demanding riding conditions. It also offers better suspension adjustability and a higher fuel tank capacity. However, it does have the weakness of noticeable set-up torque when braking in curves.
Overall, both motorcycles have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them will depend on the rider's specific needs and preferences.
Tehnične specifikacije Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017 v primerjavi z Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011
Primerjava prednosti in slabosti
Primerjava prednosti in slabosti
Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017
What the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 could do very well before, the new V-Strom 1000 and V-Strom 1000XT can also do very well: a well-balanced motorbike that does not shy away from sporty riding with good long-distance capability. In addition, there are now ultra-modern features such as lean angle ABS and Combined Brake System, which make riding even safer and faster. Suzuki takes criticism seriously, the windshield has been enlarged and, in keeping with the trend, the V-Strom 1000 now comes in a slightly more off-road XT version with wire-spoke wheels, which not only increase stability but also the cool look - especially with the golden rims of the yellow paintwork. Besides all these advantages, the low price remains the absolute killer argument for the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 / XT.
Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011
Zelo dobro opremljen Suzuki, kakršnega ne vidiš vsak dan. Od obsežno vgrajene elektronike do prijetne vozne izkušnje - v bistvu imate vse, kar potrebujete za vožnjo z motorjem.
Primerjava povprečnih tržnih cen Suzuki V-Strom 1000 vs Suzuki V-Strom 650
There are a few key differences between a Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017 and a Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017 is about 95% higher. A Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017 experiences a loss of 230 USD in one year and 750 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 210 USD and 800 USD for a Suzuki V-Strom 650 2011. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 10. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki V-Strom 650 with 61 days compared to 105 days for the Suzuki V-Strom 1000. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 40 reviews for the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 and 38 reviews for the Suzuki V-Strom 650 since model year 2005. The first review for the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 was published on 7/23/2002 and now has more than 6,300 views. This compares to more than 4,000 views for the first review on Suzuki V-Strom 650 published on 9/16/2003.
