Beta RR 125 LC Motard 2021 vs. SWM SM 125 R 2017
Beta RR 125 LC Motard 2021
SWM SM 125 R 2017
Visão geral - Beta RR 125 LC Motard 2021 vs SWM SM 125 R 2017
The Beta RR 125 LC Motard 2021 and the SWM SM 125 R 2017 are both supermoto bikes with similar engine specifications. They both have a single-cylinder engine with a displacement of around 125cc.
In terms of suspension, both bikes feature a telescopic fork at the front and a swingarm with a monoshock at the rear. However, there are some differences in the travel of the suspension. The Beta RR 125 LC Motard has a front travel of 265mm and a rear travel of 270mm, while the SWM SM 125 R has a front travel of 230mm and a rear travel of 250mm. This means that the Beta RR 125 LC Motard offers slightly more suspension travel, which can be beneficial for off-road or rough terrain riding.
When it comes to brakes, both bikes have a single disc brake at the front. However, the SWM SM 125 R has a larger front disc with a diameter of 300mm, compared to the 260mm front disc on the Beta RR 125 LC Motard. This means that the SWM SM 125 R may offer slightly better braking performance.
Beta RR 125 LC Motard 2021
In terms of dimensions and weights, there are some differences between the two bikes. The Beta RR 125 LC Motard has a narrower front tire with a width of 110mm, compared to the 140mm front tire on the SWM SM 125 R. The Beta RR 125 LC Motard also has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1425mm, compared to the 1485mm wheelbase on the SWM SM 125 R. Additionally, the Beta RR 125 LC Motard is lighter with a dry weight of 98kg, while the SWM SM 125 R weighs 117kg.
Moving on to the strengths of each bike, the Beta RR 125 LC Motard 2021 is praised for its extremely light weight of 113kg (full tank), which can contribute to better acceleration. It also has a convincing design that appeals to riders. On the other hand, the SWM SM 125 R 2017 is highlighted for its affordable price, attractive optics, reliable brakes, and sturdy chassis.
SWM SM 125 R 2017
However, both bikes have their weaknesses as well. The Beta RR 125 LC Motard is criticized for the placement of the ignition lock, which may be inconvenient for some riders. The seat is also reported to be hard, which can affect comfort during longer rides. Additionally, the CABS (Combined Anti-lock Braking System) on the Beta RR 125 LC Motard may dampen the fun on a supermoto track.
As for the SWM SM 125 R, it is mentioned that the bike's performance can be affected when starting in cold conditions. The tires on the SWM SM 125 R are also mentioned as a weakness, although specific details are not provided.
In conclusion, the Beta RR 125 LC Motard 2021 and the SWM SM 125 R 2017 are both capable supermoto bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Beta RR 125 LC Motard offers a lighter weight and more suspension travel, while the SWM SM 125 R has advantages in terms of price, optics, brakes, and chassis. Ultimately, the choice between the two would depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Especificações técnicas Beta RR 125 LC Motard 2021 em comparação com SWM SM 125 R 2017
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
Beta RR 125 LC Motard 2021
A RR Motard da Beta é provavelmente a moto de 125 cc mais desportiva do mercado. Qualquer pessoa que pretenda uma moto ágil e robusta está bem servida por ela.
SWM SM 125 R 2017
Uma 125cc económica com um design muito inteligente e desportivo.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Beta RR 125 LC Motard vs SWM SM 125 R
There are a few key differences between a Beta RR 125 LC Motard 2021 and a SWM SM 125 R 2017. It takes less time to sell a SWM SM 125 R with 51 days compared to 77 days for the Beta RR 125 LC Motard. Since model year 2021 1000PS.de editors have written 2 reviews for the Beta RR 125 LC Motard and 3 reviews for the SWM SM 125 R since model year 2017. The first review for the Beta RR 125 LC Motard was published on 09/03/2021 and now has more than 126 200 views. This compares to more than 79 100 views for the first review on SWM SM 125 R published on 18/08/2017.