Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs. Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012
Visão geral - Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs Triumph Speed Triple R 2012
The Triumph Speed Triple 1050 model year 2011 and the Triumph Speed Triple R model year 2012 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. Both models have an inline engine with a displacement of 1050cc and liquid cooling. They also have the same number of cylinders, three, and produce similar torque, with the 2011 model generating 110 Nm and the 2012 model producing 111 Nm.
In terms of power, the 2012 Speed Triple R has a slight advantage, with 135 HP compared to the 132 HP of the 2011 Speed Triple. This increase in power may result in improved performance and acceleration on the 2012 model.
Both bikes feature a telescopic front suspension, but there is a difference in the brand and adjustability. The 2011 Speed Triple has a Showa front suspension with compression and rebound adjustment, while the 2012 Speed Triple R is equipped with an Öhlins front suspension that offers compression, preload, and rebound adjustment. This suggests that the 2012 model may provide a more customizable and precise suspension setup.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
The rear suspension on both models is also different. The 2011 Speed Triple has a Showa rear suspension with compression and rebound adjustment, while the 2012 Speed Triple R features an Öhlins rear suspension with compression, preload, and rebound adjustment. Again, the 2012 model offers more adjustability and potentially improved performance in terms of suspension.
Both bikes have an aluminum frame and a double tube frame type, indicating a similar chassis design. The braking system on both models consists of four-piston front calipers, but there is a difference in technology. The 2011 Speed Triple has radial brakes, while the 2012 Speed Triple R has radial monobloc brakes. This suggests that the braking performance may be slightly better on the 2012 model.
In terms of dimensions and weights, both models have the same tire widths and diameters, with a 120mm width and 17-inch diameter for the front tire, and a 190mm width and 17-inch diameter for the rear tire. The wheelbase is slightly shorter on the 2012 Speed Triple R, measuring 1435mm compared to the 1437mm of the 2011 Speed Triple. The seat height is also slightly lower on the 2012 model, measuring 825mm compared to the 828mm of the 2011 model. Both bikes have the same fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters.

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012
In terms of strengths, the 2011 Speed Triple is praised for its controlled chassis, strong sound, and stability. On the other hand, the 2012 Speed Triple R is commended for its impeccable competition chassis, precise handling, relative stability, inspiring appearance, excellent engine, and stable brakes.
In terms of weaknesses, the 2011 Speed Triple is criticized for its occasionally rough gear shifting, which can disrupt the harmony between the rider and the machine. The 2012 Speed Triple R is said to require wider turns, can be a bit complicated to handle in curves, and may have weaknesses in terms of comfort.
Overall, the 2012 Speed Triple R offers some improvements over the 2011 Speed Triple, particularly in terms of power, suspension adjustability, and braking technology. However, it also has some weaknesses in terms of handling and comfort. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Especificações técnicas Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 em comparação com Triumph Speed Triple R 2012
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Mesmo uma Super Duke está num local apertado quando as curvas não são muito acentuadas e a KTM pode fazer pleno uso do seu comportamento radical e da sua capacidade inigualável de corrigir o raio em motos naked. A Speed Triple é mais harmoniosa, paciente e previsível. A Duke tem de ser batida, a Triple também pode ser acariciada.
Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

A R cavalga de forma tão precisa e calma como nunca antes. É garantido que mantém o seu nervo mesmo quando o piloto já o tenha deitado fora há muito tempo. A desvantagem da potência compacta é que os raios têm de ser um pouco mais largos e o percurso um pouco mais rápido para que a verdadeira rainha de Inglaterra possa também jogar os 4 ases que tem na manga.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Triumph Speed Triple 1050 vs Triumph Speed Triple R
There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and a Triumph Speed Triple R 2012. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 6. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 with 77 days compared to 78 days for a Triumph Speed Triple R. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 and 16 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple R since model year 2012. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 was published on 02/10/2007 and now has more than 16 200 views. This compares to more than 11 100 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple R published on 24/10/2011.