Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 vs. BMW R 1200 GS 2016
Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013
BMW R 1200 GS 2016
Visão geral - Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 vs BMW R 1200 GS 2016
The Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 and the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 are both enduro motorcycles that offer powerful performance and versatility for both on and off-road riding.
In terms of the engine and drivetrain, the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 features an inline 3-cylinder engine with a displacement of 1215cc, producing 137 HP of power and 121 Nm of torque. It has a shaft drive transmission. On the other hand, the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 is equipped with a boxer twin-cylinder engine with a displacement of 1170cc, delivering 125 HP of power and 125 Nm of torque. It also has a shaft drive transmission. Both bikes have a similar level of power, but the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC has a slightly higher displacement and torque.
When it comes to suspension, both motorcycles have adjustable front and rear suspension. The Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 features telescopic forks at the front, while the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 has a support suspension at the front. Both bikes offer pre-load adjustment for the suspension, allowing riders to customize the setup according to their preferences and riding conditions.
Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013
In terms of chassis, both motorcycles have a steel frame. The Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 has a tubular frame, while the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 has a double tube frame with the engine acting as a load-bearing element. Both frames provide stability and durability for off-road riding.
When it comes to braking, both motorcycles are equipped with dual disc brakes at the front. The Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 has a diameter of 19 inches for the front tire and 17 inches for the rear tire, with a width of 150mm. The BMW R 1200 GS 2016 has the same tire dimensions, but with a slightly wider rear tire at 170mm. Both bikes offer good braking performance and stability.
In terms of dimensions and weight, the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 has a wheelbase of 1530mm and a seat height of 840mm. It weighs 267kg with ABS and has a fuel tank capacity of 20 liters. On the other hand, the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1507mm and a seat height of 850mm. It weighs 238kg with ABS and also has a fuel tank capacity of 20 liters.
BMW R 1200 GS 2016
In terms of strengths, the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 is praised for its light handling, agility, and fun-to-ride nature. It also has smooth braking and a comfortable seating position. On the other hand, the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 is known for its powerful engine, low fuel consumption, comfortable seating position, and its ability to handle off-road riding. It also has a strong reputation in the market.
However, the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 has a weakness in terms of its high center of gravity, which may affect its stability in certain situations. On the other hand, the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 has a long and expensive side stand and takes some time to get used to the Telelever front suspension. It also has very sharp brakes, which may require some adjustment for riders.
In conclusion, both the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 and the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 are capable enduro motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Triumph offers a lighter and more agile riding experience, while the BMW provides a powerful engine and a comfortable seating position. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and intended use.
Especificações técnicas Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 em comparação com BMW R 1200 GS 2016
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013
A Triumph Tiger Explorer XC é uma moto imponente que já sinaliza quando estacionada que não quer necessariamente ser abusada como uma máquina de nível básico. A carenagem volumosa, portanto, se encaixa muito bem com o caráter geral da motocicleta masculina britânica.
BMW R 1200 GS 2016
Uma GS sente-se em casa em quase todo o lado - mas apenas de forma limitada na pista de corridas. É um prazer sentir a potência do bicilindro boxer parcialmente arrefecido a água à saída da curva - 125 cv só no papel parecem muito mais fracos do que os 150 ou mesmo 160 cv da concorrência. Com 125 Newton metros de binário, a aceleração a partir do fundo é soberba e a GS, com 238 quilos pronta a conduzir, não carrega demasiada flacidez apesar da sua aparência volumosa. Em curvas muito apertadas, o baixo centro de gravidade também tem um efeito positivo - a BMW R 1200 GS é muito difícil de quebrar! Mesmo a suspensão dianteira com telelever, que suprime a tendência da roda dianteira para afundar durante a travagem, encaixa-se perfeitamente no conjunto geral da GS e apenas diminui ligeiramente o seu carácter desportivo.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Triumph Tiger Explorer XC vs BMW R 1200 GS
There are a few key differences between a Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 and a BMW R 1200 GS 2016. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Tiger Explorer XC with 52 days compared to 70 days for a BMW R 1200 GS. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 5 reviews for the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC and 98 reviews for the BMW R 1200 GS since model year 2005. The first review for the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC was published on 03/09/2012 and now has more than 15 000 views. This compares to more than 19 100 views for the first review on BMW R 1200 GS published on 20/01/2004.
