Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs. Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Yamaha XSR900 2016
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Visão geral - Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
The Yamaha XSR900 2016 and the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. They both have inline engines with 3 cylinders and liquid cooling. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.
In terms of power, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 has the advantage with 132 HP compared to the Yamaha XSR900 2016's 115 HP. The Speed Triple also has a higher torque of 110 Nm compared to the XSR900's 87.5 Nm. This difference in power and torque may result in a more exhilarating riding experience on the Speed Triple.
Both bikes have a similar suspension setup with upside-down telescopic forks at the front. They also have aluminum frames and dual-tube chassis. These features contribute to the bikes' stability and control.
Yamaha XSR900 2016
In terms of dimensions and weights, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 has a narrower front tire at 120 mm compared to the Speed Triple's 190 mm. The XSR900 also has a slightly shorter wheelbase at 1440 mm compared to the Speed Triple's 1437 mm. The seat height is slightly higher on the Speed Triple at 828 mm compared to the XSR900's 815 mm. However, the Speed Triple is significantly heavier with a curb weight of 219 kg compared to the XSR900's 188 kg.
In terms of fuel capacity, the Speed Triple has a larger tank with a capacity of 17.5 liters compared to the XSR900's 14 liters. This could result in longer riding range on the Speed Triple.
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Now let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each model. The Yamaha XSR900 2016 has an eager engine with well-tuned riding modes. It also comes with ABS and traction control as standard, which enhances safety. The XSR900 has a modern and authentic design with clean finishing touches. However, it has a rigid chassis, and some riders may find the seat less comfortable. Additionally, the design of the speedometer cluster is not unique and can be found on many other models.
On the other hand, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 has a controlled chassis and a strong sound. It offers a stable riding experience. However, some riders may find the gear shifting to be rough at times, which can disrupt the overall riding experience.
In conclusion, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 and the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 are both powerful naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Speed Triple offers more power and torque, while the XSR900 has a more modern design and comes with ABS and traction control as standard. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Especificações técnicas Yamaha XSR900 2016 em comparação com Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
Yamaha XSR900 2016
A XSR900 combina o desempenho de uma streetfighter desportiva com o visual de uma naked retro agradável e com acabamentos limpos. Ao fazê-lo, os japoneses fazem uso da sua própria história, que pode ser encontrada em conjunto e sem lacunas no arquivo da agência de design que trabalha para a Yamaha há 60 anos. Adopta as virtudes da MT-09 e corrigiu algumas das suas fraquezas. A sua condução é mais harmoniosa, mais controlada e, se desejado, mais descontraída. Apenas o conforto, e portanto o piloto, sofre com o chassis apertado em estradas más. É preciso ser um pouco sensível quando se trata de uma neo-clássica.
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Mesmo uma Super Duke está num local apertado quando as curvas não são muito acentuadas e a KTM pode fazer pleno uso do seu comportamento radical e da sua capacidade inigualável de corrigir o raio em motos naked. A Speed Triple é mais harmoniosa, paciente e previsível. A Duke tem de ser batida, a Triple também pode ser acariciada.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Yamaha XSR900 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050
There are a few key differences between a Yamaha XSR900 2016 and a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha XSR900 2016 is about 4% higher. A Yamaha XSR900 2016 experiences a loss of 2 050 EUR in one year and 2 070 EUR in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 880 EUR and 1 020 EUR for a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011. Compared to Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 there are less Yamaha XSR900 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 5 compared to 6. With 77 days it takes the same amount of time to sell a Yamaha XSR900 or a Triumph Speed Triple 1050. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 and 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 since model year 2005. The first review for the Yamaha XSR900 was published on 25/11/2015 and now has more than 17 600 views. This compares to more than 16 200 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple 1050 published on 02/10/2007.
