BMW F 800 R 2009 vs. Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010
BMW F 800 R 2009
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010
Visão geral - BMW F 800 R 2009 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010
The BMW F 800 R 2009 and the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 are both naked bikes with inline engines. However, there are several differences between the two models.
In terms of power, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 has a significant advantage with 131 horsepower compared to the BMW F 800 R 2009's 87 horsepower. The Triumph also has a higher torque of 105 Nm compared to the BMW's 86 Nm. This means that the Triumph offers more acceleration and overall power.
The engine displacement is also different, with the Triumph having a larger 1050ccm engine compared to the BMW's 798ccm engine. This again contributes to the Triumph's higher power output.
BMW F 800 R 2009
Both bikes have four-piston front brakes and 17-inch diameter tires, providing good stopping power and stability. The BMW has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1520mm compared to the Triumph's 1429mm. This may affect the handling and maneuverability of the bikes, with the Triumph potentially being more agile due to its shorter wheelbase.
In terms of weight, the BMW F 800 R 2009 is lighter with a dry weight of 177kg compared to the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010's 189kg. This could make the BMW easier to handle and more nimble.
The seat height is also different, with the BMW having a higher seat at 820mm compared to the Triumph's 815mm. This may affect the comfort and ergonomics for different riders.
Both bikes have similar fuel tank capacities, with the BMW having a slightly larger 19-liter tank compared to the Triumph's 18-liter tank. This means that the BMW may have a slightly longer range before needing to refuel.
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010
In terms of strengths, the BMW F 800 R 2009 is praised for its high-quality components, excellent engine performance, good possible equipment options, positive cockpit, and a low fuel consumption rate. On the other hand, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 is praised for its higher power output, increased torque, reduced weight, improved agility, and precise and fast handling.
However, there are also weaknesses for each bike. The BMW F 800 R 2009 is criticized for its high price, slightly long first gear, and aesthetics. The Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 may have space issues for riders weighing over 100kg.
In conclusion, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 offers more power, reduced weight, and improved agility compared to the BMW F 800 R 2009. However, the BMW has its strengths in terms of high-quality components, good engine performance, and lower fuel consumption. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences and priorities.
Especificações técnicas BMW F 800 R 2009 em comparação com Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
BMW F 800 R 2009
Nos anúncios, a nova BMW F 800 R surge por vezes como uma mota de mulher. Isto não é uma injustiça para a moto, mas o motor civilizado, a baixa altura do assento e os controlos suaves são certamente adequados para senhoras pequenas.
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010
A euforia espalhou-se pelas curvas longas. A Triple é um pouco mais cara do que algumas Nippon Nakeds com chassis baratos e isso sente-se. Mantém-se estável, pode abrir-se o acelerador com força e atinge-se a linha com precisão.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado BMW F 800 R vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050
There are a few key differences between a BMW F 800 R 2009 and a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 with 57 days compared to 58 days for the BMW F 800 R. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 20 reviews for the BMW F 800 R and 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 since model year 2005. The first review for the BMW F 800 R was published on 10/10/2008 and now has more than 8 900 views. This compares to more than 16 200 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple 1050 published on 02/10/2007.
