Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 vs. Kawasaki Z900 2020

The Kawasaki ER-6n model year 2013 and the Kawasaki Z900 model year 2020 are both naked bikes produced by Kawasaki. While they share some similarities in terms of engine type, cooling system, and suspension, they also have significant differences in terms of power, torque, frame type, braking system, tire width, wheelbase, seat height, and weight.

Starting with the technical specifications, both bikes have an inline engine and liquid cooling. However, the ER-6n has a 649cc displacement, producing 72 horsepower and 64 Nm of torque, while the Z900 has a larger 948cc displacement, producing 125.4 horsepower and 98.6 Nm of torque. This makes the Z900 significantly more powerful than the ER-6n.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature a monoshock rear suspension. The chassis of the ER-6n is made of steel and has a perimeter frame, while the Z900 has a steel frame with a double cradle design. This difference in frame type may result in variations in handling and stability.

Both bikes have double disc front brakes, but the Z900 has four-piston calipers compared to the ER-6n's dual-piston calipers. This means that the Z900 may offer better braking performance and control.

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

In terms of tire dimensions, both bikes have a 17-inch front wheel diameter and a 120mm width. However, the Z900 has a wider 180mm rear tire compared to the ER-6n's 160mm rear tire. This wider rear tire on the Z900 may provide better traction and stability during cornering.

The wheelbase of the Z900 is slightly longer at 1450mm compared to the ER-6n's 1410mm. This longer wheelbase may contribute to improved stability and straight-line performance.

In terms of seat height, the ER-6n has a higher seat at 805mm compared to the Z900's 795mm. This may make the Z900 more accessible to riders with shorter inseams.

Kawasaki Z900 2020

In terms of weight, the ER-6n weighs 208kg with ABS, while the Z900 weighs slightly more at 210kg with ABS. The difference in weight is minimal and may not have a significant impact on performance.

In terms of strengths, the ER-6n is praised for its solid handling and high level of quality. On the other hand, the Z900 is praised for its powerful four-cylinder engine, excellent handling, good equipment, aggressive appearance, and good value for money.

As for weaknesses, the ER-6n is criticized for having weak brakes. On the other hand, the Z900 is criticized for having a slightly cumbersome menu navigation and lacking the option for a quickshifter.

Overall, the Kawasaki Z900 2020 offers significant improvements in terms of power, braking, and tire width compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013. However, personal preferences and budget considerations may also play a role in choosing between these two models.