Husqvarna FC 250 2016 vs. Honda CRF250R 2009
Husqvarna FC 250 2016
Honda CRF250R 2009
Visão geral - Husqvarna FC 250 2016 vs Honda CRF250R 2009
The Husqvarna FC 250 2016 and the Honda CRF250R 2009 are both motocross bikes with similar technical specifications. They both have a single-cylinder, four-stroke engine with a displacement of around 250cc. The bore and stroke measurements are also very similar, with the Husqvarna FC 250 having a bore of 78mm and a stroke of 52.3mm, while the Honda CRF250R has a bore of 78mm and a stroke of 52.2mm.
In terms of power, the Husqvarna FC 250 has a slightly higher compression ratio of 13.9, compared to the Honda CRF250R's compression ratio of 13. However, both bikes offer good performance for motocross riding.
One notable difference between the two bikes is the starting mechanism. The Husqvarna FC 250 has an electric start, which can be convenient and easy to use. On the other hand, the Honda CRF250R has a kick start, which may require more effort and skill to start the bike.
Husqvarna FC 250 2016
Both bikes feature upside-down telescopic front suspension, with the Husqvarna FC 250 using WP suspension and the Honda CRF250R using Showa suspension. The rear suspension on both bikes is also from the same manufacturers.
In terms of dimensions, the two bikes have similar tire sizes, with a 21-inch front tire and a 19-inch rear tire. The wheelbase of the Husqvarna FC 250 is slightly longer at 1495mm, compared to the Honda CRF250R's wheelbase of 1477mm. The seat height of the Husqvarna FC 250 is also slightly higher at 992mm, compared to the Honda CRF250R's seat height of 965mm.
Honda CRF250R 2009
When it comes to strengths, the Husqvarna FC 250 2016 is known for its overall performance and reliability. It is a top-of-the-line motocross bike that offers excellent handling and stability, even at high speeds. On the other hand, the Honda CRF250R 2009 is praised for its top-end performance, lightweight and improved engine, and fun handling. It also has a positive chassis that provides stability, even when riding at a fast pace.
In terms of weaknesses, the Husqvarna FC 250 2016 is reserved for factory teams and can be quite expensive. On the other hand, there are no specific weaknesses mentioned for the Honda CRF250R 2009.
Overall, both the Husqvarna FC 250 2016 and the Honda CRF250R 2009 are capable motocross bikes with similar technical specifications. The choice between the two would depend on personal preference, budget, and availability.
Especificações técnicas Husqvarna FC 250 2016 em comparação com Honda CRF250R 2009
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
Husqvarna FC 250 2016
Uma vez que apenas os pilotos de fábrica e os jornalistas seleccionados irão alguma vez conduzir estas motos de motocross, não faz sentido escrever uma conclusão. Basicamente, o que estamos a falar aqui é do melhor e mais rápido material para motos em todo-o-terreno. Todas as peças são escolhidas a dedo, fornecidas e maquinadas pelas melhores empresas. Os pilotos podem ter os seus veículos 100% personalizados de acordo com as suas necessidades e com a pista em causa. Deste ponto de vista, já não se pode falar de pontos fracos.
Honda CRF250R 2009
A nova 250 combina a potência do motor a 4 tempos com as vantagens do motor a 2 tempos e isso é impressionante.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Husqvarna FC 250 vs Honda CRF250R
There are a few key differences between a Husqvarna FC 250 2016 and a Honda CRF250R 2009. It takes less time to sell a Husqvarna FC 250 with 34 days compared to 40 days for a Honda CRF250R. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 5 reviews for the Husqvarna FC 250 and 22 reviews for the Honda CRF250R since model year 2009. The first review for the Husqvarna FC 250 was published on 03/11/2013 and now has more than 6 800 views. This compares to more than 6 400 views for the first review on Honda CRF250R published on 28/05/2003.
