Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 vs. Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2006
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005
Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2006
Visão geral - Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 vs Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2006
The Suzuki GSX-R 1000 model year 2005 and the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R model year 2006 are both supersport motorcycles with similar technical specifications. However, there are some differences between the two bikes that make each one unique.
In terms of power, the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 has a slightly higher horsepower rating of 178 HP compared to the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R's 175 HP. Both bikes have a 4-cylinder engine and a displacement of around 1000cc, providing plenty of power for high-performance riding.
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005
When it comes to dimensions and weights, the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1405 mm compared to the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R's 1390 mm. This may result in slightly different handling characteristics between the two bikes. The seat height of the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 is 810 mm, while the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R has a slightly higher seat height of 825 mm. Additionally, the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 has a dry weight of 166 kg, while the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R weighs slightly more at 173 kg.
In terms of fuel capacity, the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 has a larger fuel tank with a capacity of 18 liters, while the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R has a slightly smaller fuel tank with a capacity of 17 liters. This may result in slightly different ranges between the two bikes before needing to refuel.
Now let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each bike. The Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 is praised for its elegant appearance and superior performance. It features an anti-hopping clutch, powerful brakes, and excellent maneuverability. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2006 is known for its excellent gearbox, strong engine, overwhelming power, and well-designed chassis. It also has an Öhnling steering damper, which enhances stability during aggressive riding. Both bikes have an anti-hopping clutch, which helps prevent rear-wheel lock-up during hard downshifting.
Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2006
However, the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 is criticized for not being a bike of large dimensions, and some riders may find the seat height a bit too low. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2006 may pose difficulties for shorter riders as they may struggle to maintain their weight over the tank when accelerating.
In conclusion, both the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 and the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2006 are high-performance supersport motorcycles with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The Suzuki GSX-R 1000 offers an elegant appearance, superior performance, and excellent maneuverability. The Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R boasts a strong engine, overwhelming power, and a well-designed chassis. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's personal preferences and priorities.
Especificações técnicas Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 em comparação com Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2006
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005
Resumindo: "Uma caixa absolutamente espetacular que pode valer 15.599 euros!" O acabamento é bom, o desempenho é elevado e a experiência de condução é muito boa.
Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2006
A liderança em termos de potência do motor e um salto quântico em termos de dirigibilidade em comparação com o modelo anterior fazem dele um verdadeiro candidato à vitória.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Suzuki GSX-R 1000 vs Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R
There are a few key differences between a Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 and a Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2006. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki GSX-R 1000 with 47 days compared to 60 days for a Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 71 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 and 51 reviews for the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R since model year 2005. The first review for the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 was published on 03/03/2004 and now has more than 7.100 views. This compares to more than 2.900 views for the first review on Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R published on 11/01/2004.
