BMW R 1200 GS 2016 vs. Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014
BMW R 1200 GS 2016
Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014
Visão geral - BMW R 1200 GS 2016 vs Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014
The BMW R 1200 GS 2016 and the Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014 are both enduro motorcycles that offer a combination of on-road and off-road capabilities. While they have some similarities in terms of their technical specifications, they also have distinct differences that set them apart.
Starting with the technical specifications, the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 is powered by a Boxer engine with a displacement of 1170cc. It has a bore of 101mm and a stroke of 73mm, delivering a power output of 125 HP and a torque of 125 Nm. The transmission is a shaft drive, and it has a 2-cylinder configuration. The suspension at the front is supported by a Telelever system, and the chassis is made of steel. The front tire has a diameter of 19 inches, while the rear tire has a width of 170mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase measures 1507mm, and the seat height is 850mm. The fuel tank has a capacity of 20 liters.
BMW R 1200 GS 2016
On the other hand, the Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014 is equipped with an inline engine with a displacement of 799cc. It has a bore of 74mm and a stroke of 61.9mm, producing a power output of 95 HP and a torque of 79 Nm. The transmission is a chain drive, and it has a 3-cylinder configuration. The front suspension features a telescopic upside-down fork, and the chassis is made of steel. The front tire has a diameter of 21 inches, while the rear tire has a width of 150mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase measures 1545mm, and the seat height is 845mm. The fuel tank has a capacity of 19 liters.
In terms of strengths, the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 stands out for its powerful engine, low fuel consumption, comfortable seating position, and its ability to be used off-road. It also has a strong reputation in the motorcycle industry. On the other hand, the Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014 is praised for its dynamic engine, sporty yet comfortable chassis, easy handling, and practical advantages. It also offers an excellent price-to-performance ratio.
Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014
However, both motorcycles have their weaknesses. The BMW R 1200 GS 2016 has a long and expensive side surcharge, and it takes some time to get used to the Telelever front suspension. The brakes are also described as being very sharp. On the other hand, the Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014 has spartan instrument panels, and the onboard computer cannot be operated from the end of the handlebar. The wind and weather protection is also not as good as some other models.
In conclusion, the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 and the Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014 are both capable enduro motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The BMW offers a powerful engine and a comfortable seating position, while the Triumph provides a dynamic engine and a sporty yet comfortable chassis. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Especificações técnicas BMW R 1200 GS 2016 em comparação com Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
BMW R 1200 GS 2016
Uma GS sente-se em casa em quase todo o lado - mas apenas de forma limitada na pista de corridas. É um prazer sentir a potência do bicilindro boxer parcialmente arrefecido a água à saída da curva - 125 cv só no papel parecem muito mais fracos do que os 150 ou mesmo 160 cv da concorrência. Com 125 Newton metros de binário, a aceleração a partir do fundo é soberba e a GS, com 238 quilos pronta a conduzir, não carrega demasiada flacidez apesar da sua aparência volumosa. Em curvas muito apertadas, o baixo centro de gravidade também tem um efeito positivo - a BMW R 1200 GS é muito difícil de quebrar! Mesmo a suspensão dianteira com telelever, que suprime a tendência da roda dianteira para afundar durante a travagem, encaixa-se perfeitamente no conjunto geral da GS e apenas diminui ligeiramente o seu carácter desportivo.
Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014
Gosto da Tiger 800 XC não só na estrada, para as minhas deslocações diárias para o trabalho. É um veículo muito simples que, graças ao motor potente e vivo, não só é muito útil como também muito divertido. Na pista de corridas, na verdade, só utilizei o veículo para o meu trabalho de instrutor. Mas não pude deixar de o fazer e tive de ir para a pista uma vez no grupo mais rápido. O chassis de alta qualidade e o motor ágil foram uma alegria para mim e a Tiger 800 XC é o talento universal por excelência.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado BMW R 1200 GS vs Triumph Tiger 800 XC
There are a few key differences between a BMW R 1200 GS 2016 and a Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 47. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Tiger 800 XC with 48 days compared to 70 days for the BMW R 1200 GS. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 98 reviews for the BMW R 1200 GS and 16 reviews for the Triumph Tiger 800 XC since model year 2011. The first review for the BMW R 1200 GS was published on 20/01/2004 and now has more than 19.100 views. This compares to more than 8.200 views for the first review on Triumph Tiger 800 XC published on 01/11/2010.
