Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs. Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
Yamaha XSR900 2016
Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
Visão geral - Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
The Yamaha XSR900 2016 and the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. Both bikes have an inline engine with liquid cooling and three cylinders. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.
In terms of power, the Triumph Speed Triple S has a higher horsepower rating of 140 HP compared to the Yamaha XSR900's 115 HP. The Triumph also has a higher torque rating of 112 Nm compared to the Yamaha's 87.5 Nm. This means that the Triumph may have better acceleration and overall performance.
Both bikes have similar suspension setups with a telescopic fork at the front and a monoshock at the rear. However, the Triumph Speed Triple S has a single swingarm rear suspension, while the Yamaha XSR900 has a dual swingarm setup. This could potentially affect the handling and comfort of the bikes.
Yamaha XSR900 2016
In terms of chassis, both bikes have an aluminum frame and a double tube frame design. This provides a good balance between rigidity and weight. However, the Yamaha XSR900 has been criticized for having a rigid chassis, which could affect the overall ride quality.
When it comes to braking, both bikes have dual disc brakes at the front. However, the Triumph Speed Triple S has larger diameter discs at 320 mm compared to the Yamaha XSR900's 298 mm discs. This could potentially provide better stopping power and control.
In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have similar tire widths and diameters. The Yamaha XSR900 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1440 mm compared to the Triumph Speed Triple S's 1435 mm. The Yamaha also has a lower seat height of 815 mm compared to the Triumph's 825 mm. However, the Triumph Speed Triple S is significantly heavier with a curb weight of 214 kg compared to the Yamaha XSR900's 188 kg.
In terms of fuel capacity, the Triumph Speed Triple S has a larger tank with a capacity of 15.5 liters compared to the Yamaha XSR900's 14 liters. This could potentially provide a longer range between refueling.
Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
In terms of strengths, the Yamaha XSR900 has an eager engine, well-tuned riding modes, and ABS and TC as standard features. It also has a modern and authentic design with clean finishing. On the other hand, the Triumph Speed Triple S has a distinct three-cylinder engine sound, a unique appearance, good brakes, a sporty seating position, and a well-functioning electronic package.
In terms of weaknesses, the Yamaha XSR900 has been criticized for its rigid chassis, uncomfortable seat, and a design that is similar to many other models. The Triumph Speed Triple S has been criticized for its somewhat unresponsive low-end power and slightly slow handling.
Overall, both the Yamaha XSR900 2016 and the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 are capable naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two would ultimately depend on the rider's personal preferences and priorities.
Especificações técnicas Yamaha XSR900 2016 em comparação com Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
Yamaha XSR900 2016
A XSR900 combina o desempenho de uma streetfighter desportiva com o visual de uma naked retro agradável e com acabamentos limpos. Ao fazê-lo, os japoneses fazem uso da sua própria história, que pode ser encontrada em conjunto e sem lacunas no arquivo da agência de design que trabalha para a Yamaha há 60 anos. Adopta as virtudes da MT-09 e corrigiu algumas das suas fraquezas. A sua condução é mais harmoniosa, mais controlada e, se desejado, mais descontraída. Apenas o conforto, e portanto o piloto, sofre com o chassis apertado em estradas más. É preciso ser um pouco sensível quando se trata de uma neo-clássica.
Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
A Speed Triple mantém-se fiel à sua linha na última geração - uma moto naked maravilhosamente afiada que caracteriza o estilo streetfighter como quase nenhum outro modelo. O motor de três cilindros com 140 cv é muito divertido e o Fafhrwerk não mostra grandes fraquezas, mas existe uma Speed Triple R com elementos de suspensão Öhlins que naturalmente se sente mais à vontade na pista de corridas. Em suma, a Speed Triple S é uma excelente lutadora de estrada rural que também tem muito a oferecer em termos de aparência.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Yamaha XSR900 vs Triumph Speed Triple S
There are a few key differences between a Yamaha XSR900 2016 and a Triumph Speed Triple S 2016. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 5. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha XSR900 with 77 days compared to 93 days for a Triumph Speed Triple S. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 and 6 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple S since model year 2016. The first review for the Yamaha XSR900 was published on 25/11/2015 and now has more than 17.600 views. This compares to more than 10.300 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple S published on 23/10/2011.
