Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 vs. Kawasaki Z650 2020

The Kawasaki ER-6n model year 2013 and the Kawasaki Z650 model year 2020 are both naked bikes from Kawasaki, but they have some notable differences in terms of specifications and features.

Starting with the technical specifications, both bikes have an inline engine with a displacement of 649cc and liquid cooling. However, the power output of the ER-6n is slightly higher at 72 HP compared to the Z650's 68.2 HP. The torque figures are also close, with the ER-6n producing 64 Nm and the Z650 generating 65.7 Nm. Both bikes have a 2-cylinder engine configuration.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature a monoshock rear suspension setup. The chassis of the ER-6n is made of steel and has a perimeter frame, while the Z650 has a tubular frame. This could potentially affect the handling and stability of the bikes, with the ER-6n having a more solid feel due to its steel frame.

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Both bikes are equipped with double disc front brakes with dual-piston calipers and petal technology. However, the ER-6n is criticized for having weak brakes, which could be a disadvantage compared to the Z650.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths (120mm and 160mm, respectively) and the same 17-inch wheel diameter. They also have the same wheelbase of 1410mm. However, there are some differences in seat height and weight. The Z650 has a lower seat height of 790mm compared to the ER-6n's 805mm, making it potentially more comfortable for shorter riders. The Z650 is also lighter, with a curb weight of 185kg compared to the ER-6n's 204kg. With ABS, the Z650's weight increases slightly to 187.1kg.

In terms of fuel capacity, the ER-6n has a larger fuel tank with a capacity of 16 liters, while the Z650 has a slightly smaller tank with a capacity of 15 liters.

Kawasaki Z650 2020

Moving on to the strengths of each bike, the ER-6n is praised for its solid handling and high level of quality. On the other hand, the Z650 has a powerful twin-cylinder engine, aggressive intake noise, compact dimensions, low seat height, stable chassis, TFT display with connectivity, and a more mature appearance.

In terms of weaknesses, the ER-6n is criticized for having weak brakes, which could be a safety concern. The Z650, on the other hand, has been noted to have a point of pressure in the front brake and may not be as comfortable for taller riders. Additionally, the Rideology application on the Z650 is not considered to be 100% sophisticated.

In conclusion, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 and the Kawasaki Z650 2020 are both capable naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The ER-6n offers solid handling and quality, while the Z650 boasts a powerful engine, compact dimensions, and modern features. Ultimately, the choice between the two would depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.