Honda CB500F 2013 vs. Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
Honda CB500F 2013
Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
Visão geral - Honda CB500F 2013 vs Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
The Honda CB500F model year 2013 and the Kawasaki ER-6n model year 2011 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience.
Starting with the technical specifications, both bikes have an inline engine configuration and liquid cooling. The Honda CB500F is equipped with a 471cc engine that produces 48 horsepower and 43 Nm of torque, while the Kawasaki ER-6n has a larger 649cc engine that delivers 72 horsepower and 66 Nm of torque. This gives the Kawasaki ER-6n a significant advantage in terms of power.
In terms of chassis, both bikes feature a steel frame that provides stability and durability. The Honda CB500F has a single disc front brake with dual pistons, while the Kawasaki ER-6n has dual disc front brakes with dual pistons. This gives the Kawasaki ER-6n better braking performance.
Honda CB500F 2013
In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths of 120mm and 160mm respectively. They also have the same wheelbase of 1410mm and seat height of 790mm. However, the Honda CB500F is lighter with a curb weight of 192kg (with ABS), while the Kawasaki ER-6n weighs 208kg (with ABS).
When it comes to fuel capacity, the Honda CB500F has a slightly larger tank with a capacity of 15.7 liters compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n's 15.5 liters.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
Now let's discuss the strengths of each bike. The Honda CB500F has a relatively low total weight, making it agile and easy to handle. It also has an acceptable chassis and provides good comfort with a strong engine and a comfortable seating position. On the other hand, the Kawasaki ER-6n offers the advantage of ABS, a wider handlebar, and a slimmer waist. It also has a louder intake noise and a comfortable seat. Additionally, the Kawasaki ER-6n has a simpler chassis design.
In terms of weaknesses, the Honda CB500F has a partially deficient finish and lacks a gear indicator. On the other hand, the Kawasaki ER-6n does not have any specific weaknesses mentioned.
In conclusion, both the Honda CB500F 2013 and the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 are great naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Honda CB500F offers a lighter weight and good handling, while the Kawasaki ER-6n provides more power, ABS, and some ergonomic advantages. It ultimately comes down to personal preference and priorities when choosing between these two models.
Especificações técnicas Honda CB500F 2013 em comparação com Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
Honda CB500F 2013
No entanto, estes pequenos pormenores não podem manchar a boa imagem da Honda CB500F. Após os primeiros metros, não havia dúvidas de que seria uma excelente escolha para uma mota de entrada de gama. Mas o facto de também poder satisfazer exigências mais elevadas é um pouco surpreendente, especialmente o motor, que agrada pela sua resposta ágil e pelo prazer de acelerar.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
Não vai encontrar um pacote tão coerente com detalhes tão finos em qualquer outro lugar a este preço. O ER-6n voltou a ser um pouco mais nítido, tanto visual como dinamicamente, e é mais divertido do que nunca.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Honda CB500F vs Kawasaki ER-6n
There are a few key differences between a Honda CB500F 2013 and a Kawasaki ER-6n 2011. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Honda CB500F 2013 is about 14% higher. A Honda CB500F 2013 experiences a loss of 3.540 BRL in one year and 5.150 BRL in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 1.560 BRL and 3.370 BRL for a Kawasaki ER-6n 2011. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 5. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki ER-6n with 49 days compared to 54 days for the Honda CB500F. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 22 reviews for the Honda CB500F and 16 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6n since model year 2006. The first review for the Honda CB500F was published on 10/11/2012 and now has more than 18.500 views. This compares to more than 11.200 views for the first review on Kawasaki ER-6n published on 29/06/2005.
