Husqvarna FE 450 2024 vs. Husqvarna FE 501 2024

The Husqvarna FE 450 and FE 501 models for the year 2024 share many similarities in their technical specifications. Both models have a single-cylinder engine with a bore of 95 mm and an electric start. They also have the same suspension setup, with a WP telescopic fork with a 48 mm diameter and 300 mm of travel in the front, and a swingarm with a WP monoshock and 300 mm of travel in the rear. The chassis for both models is made of chromium-molybdenum and features a double-cradle, central tube frame design, with a rake angle of 63.9 degrees. They both have a single disc front brake and use 21-inch front and 18-inch rear tires, with a width of 140 mm. The seat height for both models is 952 mm, and they have a dry weight of 109.8 kg for the FE 450 and 110.8 kg for the FE 501. The fuel tank capacity is 8 liters for both models.

Husqvarna FE 450 2024

In terms of strengths, both the Husqvarna FE 450 and FE 501 have a practical chassis configuration that suits a wide range of uses. They have precise lines and a robust overall appearance. The bikes have low vibration levels on the seat and offer great ergonomics, with plenty of space to move around. The high-quality chassis and powerful engines make them ideal for sporty riders. They also perform well on steep descents, with good traction and a surprisingly low tendency to wheelie.

However, both models also have some weaknesses. The plastics in the luggage area tend to wear quickly, and the prices are generally considered high. The handlebar position on the seat is too far forward, and the kickstand can be difficult to fold down. Additionally, the FE 501 has a noticeable tendency for the engine to push more during descents compared to lighter models.

Husqvarna FE 501 2024

In summary, the Husqvarna FE 450 and FE 501 models for the year 2024 are similar in many aspects, including their technical specifications and strengths. They both offer a practical chassis configuration, precise lines, low vibration levels, and a robust overall appearance. However, they also have some weaknesses, such as quickly wearing plastics in the luggage area and high prices. Overall, both models are well-suited for a variety of uses and offer a great riding experience.