Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 vs. Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

Yamaha FZ-8N 2010

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013
Visão geral - Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013
The Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 and the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 are both naked bikes with similar power outputs of 106 HP. However, there are several differences between the two models.
In terms of the engine and drivetrain, the Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 has a higher torque rating of 82 Nm compared to the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013's 68 Nm. The Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 also has four cylinders, while the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 has three cylinders. Both bikes have liquid cooling systems and similar displacements, with the Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 at 779cc and the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 at 675cc.

Yamaha FZ-8N 2010
When it comes to suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front. However, the Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 has a Deltabox frame, while the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 has a twin-tube frame. This could result in differences in handling and stability.
In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths of 120mm and 180mm respectively, with 17-inch diameter wheels. The Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 has a longer wheelbase of 1460mm compared to the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013's 1410mm. The seat height of the Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 is also slightly higher at 815mm compared to the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013's 800mm. However, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 is significantly lighter, weighing in at 183kg compared to the Yamaha FZ-8N 2010's 211kg. Both bikes have similar fuel tank capacities, with the Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 at 17 liters and the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 at 17.4 liters.
In terms of strengths, the Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 offers sporty performance, a robust appearance, a pleasant riding experience, and is relatively quick. On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 has a tight and playful chassis, is agile, has a low weight, powerful brakes, and offers comfort.

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013
However, the Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 has a negative visual aspect with its exhaust pipe, while the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 has slightly harsh brake application at the end.
In conclusion, while both the Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 and the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 have their strengths and weaknesses, they offer different riding experiences. The Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 may appeal to riders looking for a sportier and robust bike, while the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 may be more suitable for those seeking a playful and agile ride with added comfort.
Especificações técnicas Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 em comparação com Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
Yamaha FZ-8N 2010

Seguindo livremente a visão filosófico-otimista de que o copo não está meio vazio, mas meio cheio, na Yamaha não é preciso decidir CONTRA duas, mas A FAVOR de uma. Em todo o caso, a FZ8 tem potencial suficiente para se tornar a média dourada no círculo das motos de corpo livre.
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

Se procura uma moto naked animada no segmento de gama média que seja especialmente divertida para passeios desportivos em estradas rurais, a Street Triple 675 R é a escolha perfeita. Se a sobretaxa razoável para a R compensa, deve ser decidido se quer realmente ajustar o chassis ou deixá-lo na configuração básica bem escolhida.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Yamaha FZ-8N vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R
There are a few key differences between a Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 and a Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple 675 R with 52 days compared to 57 days for the Yamaha FZ-8N. Since model year 2010 1000PS.de editors have written 11 reviews for the Yamaha FZ-8N and 16 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R since model year 2009. The first review for the Yamaha FZ-8N was published on 27/01/2010 and now has more than 8.200 views. This compares to more than 13.000 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple 675 R published on 20/07/2008.