Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 vs. Kawasaki Z1000SX 2016
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
Kawasaki Z1000SX 2016
Visão geral - Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 vs Kawasaki Z1000SX 2016
The Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 and the Kawasaki Z1000SX 2016 are both motorcycles from the Kawasaki brand, but they have several differences in terms of specifications and features.
Starting with the engine and drivetrain, both models have an inline engine and chain transmission. However, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 has a smaller engine with a power output of 72 HP and a torque of 64 Nm. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z1000SX 2016 has a more powerful engine with 142 HP of power and 111 Nm of torque. The displacement of the ER-6n is 649cc, while the Z1000SX has a larger displacement of 1043cc. This makes the Z1000SX more suitable for sport touring, as it provides a more confident and powerful ride.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
In terms of braking, both models have dual disc brakes at the front. However, the Kawasaki Z1000SX 2016 has four-piston calipers, while the ER-6n 2013 has dual-piston calipers. This gives the Z1000SX better braking performance and control.
When it comes to dimensions and weights, the Kawasaki Z1000SX 2016 is slightly larger and heavier than the ER-6n 2013. The Z1000SX has a wider front tire (120mm vs 120mm) and a wider rear tire (190mm vs 160mm). It also has a longer wheelbase (1445mm vs 1410mm) and a higher seat height (822mm vs 805mm). Additionally, the Z1000SX has a higher curb weight of 231kg compared to the ER-6n's 204kg. However, the Z1000SX also has a larger fuel tank capacity of 19 liters, while the ER-6n has a capacity of 16 liters.
In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 is praised for its solid handling and high level of quality. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z1000SX 2016 has a confident and powerful engine, suitable fairing for touring, sporty design, good electronic features such as traction control and cornering ABS, pleasantly comfortable seating, and a well-integrated pannier system.
Kawasaki Z1000SX 2016
As for weaknesses, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 is criticized for having weak brakes. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z1000SX 2016 is said to have somewhat stiff handling in tight corners and suboptimal illumination of the instruments.
Overall, the Kawasaki Z1000SX 2016 offers a more powerful and feature-rich riding experience, making it a better choice for those looking for a sport touring motorcycle. However, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 still has its merits with its solid handling and quality build.
Especificações técnicas Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 em comparação com Kawasaki Z1000SX 2016
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
O motor é potente e muito divertido, e o ER brilha com um acabamento japonês meticuloso e um preço de combate.
Kawasaki Z1000SX 2016
O modelo atual da Kawasaki Z1000SX já é uma moto maravilhosamente equilibrada que marca pontos com os seus encantos desportivos, bem como com as suas características de conforto e capacidade de longa distância. No entanto, o novo modelo de 2017 torna tudo ainda melhor: proteção contra o vento refinada, um assento mais confortável, melhores acessórios e uma série de ajudas electrónicas que tornam a condução segura e confiante mesmo em condições adversas. Nada teve de ser alterado no carácter desportivo do potente motor, e o visual com os faróis LED e os muitos rebordos está quase ao nível de uma super mota desportiva - em suma, uma evolução absolutamente bem sucedida.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Kawasaki ER-6n vs Kawasaki Z1000SX
There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 and a Kawasaki Z1000SX 2016. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki ER-6n with 42 days compared to 96 days for a Kawasaki Z1000SX. Since model year 2006 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6n and 14 reviews for the Kawasaki Z1000SX since model year 2011. The first review for the Kawasaki ER-6n was published on 29/06/2005 and now has more than 11.200 views. This compares to more than 9.900 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z1000SX published on 05/10/2010.
