BMW F 800 R 2009 vs. Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2009
BMW F 800 R 2009
Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2009
Visão geral - BMW F 800 R 2009 vs Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2009
The BMW F 800 R 2009 and the Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2009 are both naked bikes from reputable manufacturers. Both bikes have their own strengths and weaknesses, making them suitable for different types of riders.
BMW F 800 R 2009
Starting with the BMW F 800 R 2009, it boasts a powerful engine with 87 HP and 86 Nm of torque. The bike is equipped with a 2-cylinder engine and has a displacement of 798ccm. The front brakes are of the dual disc type with four pistons, providing excellent stopping power. The bike has a 17-inch front and rear tire diameter, offering good stability on the road. The wheelbase is 1520mm, providing a comfortable and stable ride. The seat height is 820mm, which may be a bit high for shorter riders. The fuel tank has a capacity of 19 liters, allowing for longer rides without frequent refueling. The BMW F 800 R 2009 is known for its high-quality components, great engine performance, good possible equipment options, a well-designed cockpit, a positive chassis, and low fuel consumption. However, it does have a high price tag, a slightly long first gear, and some aesthetic issues.
On the other hand, the Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2009 features a more powerful engine with 102 HP and 64 Nm of torque. The bike is equipped with a 4-cylinder engine and has a displacement of 599ccm. Similar to the BMW, it has dual disc front brakes, but with dual pistons, still providing strong braking performance. The bike also has a 17-inch front and rear tire diameter, ensuring stability on the road. The wheelbase is slightly shorter at 1435mm, which may result in a slightly less stable ride compared to the BMW. The seat height is 800mm, slightly lower than the BMW, making it more accessible for shorter riders. The fuel tank has the same capacity of 19 liters, allowing for longer rides. The Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2009 is praised for its large second-hand market, excellent engine tuning, high-quality build, visually sophisticated design, strong brakes, and the inclusion of ABS. However, it has limited ground clearance for leaning angles, the chassis could be improved, and some cheap details can be noticed.
Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2009
In conclusion, the BMW F 800 R 2009 and the Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2009 are both solid choices for naked bikes. The BMW offers high-quality components, a great engine, and a positive chassis, but comes with a higher price tag and some aesthetic issues. On the other hand, the Honda provides a powerful engine, visually sophisticated design, and strong brakes, but has limited ground clearance and some cheap details. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Especificações técnicas BMW F 800 R 2009 em comparação com Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2009
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
BMW F 800 R 2009
Nos anúncios, a nova BMW F 800 R surge por vezes como uma mota de mulher. Isto não é uma injustiça para a moto, mas o motor civilizado, a baixa altura do assento e os controlos suaves são certamente adequados para senhoras pequenas.
Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2009
A 600 Hornet já é um clássico neste segmento. A primeira Hornet era barata e, no fundo, era uma CBR um pouco mais fina. Pouco menos de 100 cv e o design moderno eram suficientes para se poder exibir em todo o lado, mesmo com pouco dinheiro.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado BMW F 800 R vs Honda CB 600 F Hornet
There are a few key differences between a BMW F 800 R 2009 and a Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2009. It takes less time to sell a BMW F 800 R with 58 days compared to 68 days for a Honda CB 600 F Hornet. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 20 reviews for the BMW F 800 R and 15 reviews for the Honda CB 600 F Hornet since model year 2005. The first review for the BMW F 800 R was published on 10/10/2008 and now has more than 8.900 views. This compares to more than 16.800 views for the first review on Honda CB 600 F Hornet published on 16/02/2005.
