BMW R 1250 GS 2019 vs. KTM 1290 Super Adventure S 2023

The BMW R 1250 GS 2019 and the KTM 1290 Super Adventure S 2023 are both powerful and capable adventure motorcycles. However, they have some key differences in terms of their technical specifications and features.

Starting with the engines, the BMW R 1250 GS 2019 is equipped with a Boxer engine, while the KTM 1290 Super Adventure S 2023 features a V2 engine. The BMW has a bore of 102.5 mm and a stroke of 76 mm, producing a power output of 136 HP and a torque of 143 Nm. On the other hand, the KTM has a larger bore of 108 mm and a shorter stroke of 71 mm, resulting in a higher power output of 160 HP and a torque of 138 Nm. Both motorcycles have electric starters and offer smooth and reliable performance.

In terms of transmission, the BMW R 1250 GS 2019 uses a shaft drive, while the KTM 1290 Super Adventure S 2023 utilizes a chain drive. The BMW has a displacement of 1254 ccm, while the KTM has a larger displacement of 1301 ccm. Both motorcycles have 2 cylinders.

BMW R 1250 GS 2019

When it comes to suspension, the BMW R 1250 GS 2019 features a Telelever front suspension with a diameter of 37 mm and a travel of 190 mm. The rear suspension is a single swingarm with a monoshock and a travel of 200 mm. The suspension is adjustable for preload. On the other hand, the KTM 1290 Super Adventure S 2023 has a front suspension with a telescopic upside-down fork with a diameter of 48 mm and a travel of 200 mm. The rear suspension is also a single swingarm with a monoshock and a travel of 200 mm. The suspension on the KTM is adjustable for compression, preload, and recovery.

In terms of chassis, the BMW R 1250 GS 2019 has a steel frame and a rake of 62.9 degrees. The KTM 1290 Super Adventure S 2023, on the other hand, features a chromium-molybdenum frame and a rake of 65.3 degrees. Both motorcycles have dual disc front brakes for reliable stopping power.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the BMW R 1250 GS 2019 has a front tire diameter of 19 inches, a rear tire width of 170 mm, and a rear tire diameter of 17 inches. It has a wheelbase of 1525 mm and a seat height that can be adjusted between 850 mm and 870 mm. The curb weight, with ABS, is 249 kg, and it has a fuel tank capacity of 20 liters. The KTM 1290 Super Adventure S 2023 has the same tire dimensions as the BMW, a slightly longer wheelbase of 1560 mm, and a seat height that can be adjusted between 849 mm and 869 mm. The curb weight, with ABS, is slightly lighter at 243 kg, and it has a larger fuel tank capacity of 23 liters.

In terms of equipment, both motorcycles come with LED headlights and adjustable windshields. The BMW R 1250 GS 2019 features a color TFT screen as standard, while the KTM 1290 Super Adventure S 2023 offers a 7-inch TFT screen with clear and well-structured instrumentation. The KTM also offers additional features such as connectivity, keyless system, cornering lights, and an adjustable suspension system.

KTM 1290 Super Adventure S 2023

In terms of strengths, the BMW R 1250 GS 2019 is praised for its extremely high torque boxer engine, comfortable riding position for long distances, stable braking performance, good weather protection, and standard color TFT screen and LED headlights. On the other hand, the KTM 1290 Super Adventure S 2023 is praised for its sporty yet refined V2 powertrain, playful handling despite its weight, comfortable riding position, excellent brakes including ABS for curves, comprehensive electronic package, adaptive cruise control, and a large 7-inch TFT screen.

In terms of weaknesses, the BMW R 1250 GS 2019 is criticized for its manageable standard equipment and long list of optional extras, as well as its somewhat irregular appearance with little elegance. The KTM 1290 Super Adventure S 2023 is noted for its additional features such as the quickshifter and other characteristics that come at an additional cost, its idiosyncratic appearance, and a firm seat.

Overall, both the BMW R 1250 GS 2019 and the KTM 1290 Super Adventure S 2023 are highly capable adventure motorcycles with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two would ultimately depend on the rider's preferences and priorities in terms of performance, features, and design.