Husqvarna FE 250 2015 vs. Husqvarna FC 250 2016
Husqvarna FE 250 2015
Husqvarna FC 250 2016
Visão geral - Husqvarna FE 250 2015 vs Husqvarna FC 250 2016
The Husqvarna FE 250 model year 2015 and the Husqvarna FC 250 model year 2016 are both off-road motorcycles manufactured by Husqvarna. While they share some similarities in their technical specifications, there are also notable differences between the two models.
In terms of the engine and drivetrain, both the FE 250 2015 and the FC 250 2016 have the same bore and stroke measurements of 78mm and 52.3mm, respectively. However, the FC 250 2016 has a higher compression ratio of 13.9 compared to the FE 250 2015's compression ratio of 12.8. This higher compression ratio in the FC 250 2016 may result in improved engine performance and power delivery.
Another difference between the two models is the starting mechanism. The FE 250 2015 features a kick-start system, while the FC 250 2016 is equipped with an electric start. This electric start feature in the FC 250 2016 provides convenience and ease of use, especially in situations where a kick-start may be challenging.
Both the FE 250 2015 and the FC 250 2016 have a chain transmission and a single cylinder, four-stroke engine. The displacement of the FE 250 2015 is 249.91cc, while the FC 250 2016 has a displacement of 249.9cc. These slight differences in displacement are negligible and are unlikely to significantly impact the overall performance of the motorcycles.
Husqvarna FE 250 2015
In terms of suspension, both models feature a telescopic upside-down fork at the front and a deflection shock at the rear, both manufactured by WP. This suspension setup provides good handling and stability on various terrains.
Both the FE 250 2015 and the FC 250 2016 have a steel frame with a central tube design. This frame design offers durability and rigidity, ensuring a stable and responsive ride.
When it comes to dimensions and weights, there are some differences between the two models. The FC 250 2016 has a slightly narrower front tire width of 80mm compared to the FE 250 2015's 90mm. The rear tire width of the FC 250 2016 is also narrower at 100mm compared to the FE 250 2015's 120mm. The FC 250 2016 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1495mm compared to the FE 250 2015's 1482mm. The seat height of the FC 250 2016 is also slightly higher at 992mm compared to the FE 250 2015's 970mm. In terms of weight, the FC 250 2016 is slightly lighter with a dry weight of 104.1kg compared to the FE 250 2015's 107.5kg.
Husqvarna FC 250 2016
In terms of weaknesses, the FE 250 2015 is noted to struggle in steep downhill sections or when faced with large obstacles. Additionally, despite positioning itself as an entry-level enduro, the FE 250 2015 is relatively expensive compared to other similar motorcycles.
As for the strengths, the FE 250 2015 is praised for being very easy to ride, with the engine responding well throughout the entire range of rotations. It is also described as lightweight and maneuverable, but not as aggressive as the 350. The components used in the FE 250 2015 are of high quality.
On the other hand, the FC 250 2016 is described as having all strengths, but no specific details are provided. However, it is mentioned that the FC 250 2016 is reserved only for factory teams and is relatively expensive.
In conclusion, while both the Husqvarna FE 250 2015 and the Husqvarna FC 250 2016 have similar technical specifications, there are notable differences between the two models. The FC 250 2016 offers a higher compression ratio and an electric start, which may result in improved engine performance and convenience. The FE 250 2015, on the other hand, is praised for its ease of use, lightweight design, and high-quality components. However, it may struggle in challenging off-road conditions and is relatively expensive compared to other motorcycles in its class.
Especificações técnicas Husqvarna FE 250 2015 em comparação com Husqvarna FC 250 2016
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
Husqvarna FE 250 2015
Durante o teste, conduzimos a FE250 em condições normais e depois também com a embraiagem automática Rekluse. A embraiagem automática adequa-se realmente à FE250, que é fácil de conduzir e agradável aos olhos. O acessório é provavelmente também perfeitamente adequado para o grupo-alvo da moto. Em suma, a FE250 é uma moto que pode fazer muito mais do que se poderia esperar à primeira vista. Em secções muito duras, no entanto, são os pilotos menos talentosos que gostariam de ter um pouco mais de binário.
Husqvarna FC 250 2016
Uma vez que apenas os pilotos de fábrica e os jornalistas seleccionados irão alguma vez conduzir estas motos de motocross, não faz sentido escrever uma conclusão. Basicamente, o que estamos a falar aqui é do melhor e mais rápido material para motos em todo-o-terreno. Todas as peças são escolhidas a dedo, fornecidas e maquinadas pelas melhores empresas. Os pilotos podem ter os seus veículos 100% personalizados de acordo com as suas necessidades e com a pista em causa. Deste ponto de vista, já não se pode falar de pontos fracos.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Husqvarna FE 250 vs Husqvarna FC 250
There are a few key differences between a Husqvarna FE 250 2015 and a Husqvarna FC 250 2016. It takes less time to sell a Husqvarna FC 250 with 34 days compared to 56 days for the Husqvarna FE 250. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 7 reviews for the Husqvarna FE 250 and 5 reviews for the Husqvarna FC 250 since model year 2014. The first review for the Husqvarna FE 250 was published on 27/03/2015 and now has more than 48.700 views. This compares to more than 6.800 views for the first review on Husqvarna FC 250 published on 03/11/2013.
