Ducati Monster 696 2008 vs. Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

Ducati Monster 696 2008

Ducati Monster 696 2008

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

Loading...

Visão geral - Ducati Monster 696 2008 vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

The Ducati Monster 696 2008 and the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of power, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 takes the lead with its 106 HP engine, compared to the Ducati Monster 696 2008's 80 HP engine. This higher power output gives the Triumph a clear advantage in terms of acceleration and top speed.

Another notable difference is the number of cylinders. The Ducati Monster 696 2008 has a 2-cylinder engine, while the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 boasts a 3-cylinder engine. The additional cylinder in the Triumph provides smoother power delivery and a more refined engine performance.

When it comes to cooling systems, the Ducati Monster 696 2008 relies on oil/air cooling, while the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 features a liquid cooling system. Liquid cooling is generally more efficient and allows for better heat dissipation, which can result in improved engine performance and longevity.

Ducati Monster 696 2008

Ducati Monster 696 2008

In terms of displacement, the Ducati Monster 696 2008 has a slightly larger engine at 696cc, compared to the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012's 675cc engine. While the difference may not be significant, it can still impact the overall performance and torque delivery of the bikes.

Moving on to dimensions and weights, the Ducati Monster 696 2008 has a longer wheelbase at 1452mm, compared to the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012's 1410mm. A longer wheelbase generally contributes to stability at higher speeds, while a shorter wheelbase can enhance maneuverability and agility.

The seat height of the Ducati Monster 696 2008 is 770mm, while the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 sits slightly higher at 805mm. This difference in seat height may be a factor to consider for riders of different heights, as it can affect comfort and reach to the ground.

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

In terms of fuel capacity, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 has a larger fuel tank at 17.4 liters, compared to the Ducati Monster 696 2008's 15 liters. This can result in a longer range between refueling stops for the Triumph.

Now, let's consider the strengths and weaknesses of each model. The Ducati Monster 696 2008 is praised for its comfort, smooth handling, and reliable brakes. However, its design may not be as sophisticated as some other models, and its chassis can be relatively complex, making it less suitable for beginners.

On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 stands out for its lighter weight, superior performance, and nimble handling. It is highly praised for its agility in corners and its upright riding position, which offers a comfortable and commanding view of the road. However, one potential drawback is the absence of ABS, although this can be easily added at an additional cost.

In conclusion, both the Ducati Monster 696 2008 and the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 are impressive naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The Ducati offers a comfortable ride and reliable brakes, while the Triumph excels in performance and handling. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Especificações técnicas Ducati Monster 696 2008 em comparação com Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

Ducati Monster 696 2008
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012
Mostrar tudo
Apenas o mesmo
Diferenças
Ducati Monster 696 2008
Ducati Monster 696 2008
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

Prós e contras em comparação

Prós e contras em comparação

Ducati Monster 696 2008

Ducati Monster 696 2008

Será interessante ver como é que o novo design é recebido pelos antigos fãs e se chegará a um número suficiente de novos fãs. Em todo o caso, o Monster mais pequeno deu um grande passo em frente em termos de desempenho.

Conforto

boa condução

travões.

O design não é demasiado sofisticado

o chassis é relativamente complicado - não é para principiantes.

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

Basta o mais pequeno impulso e a pequena inglesa vira exatamente como se pretende. Esta manobrabilidade também não tem paralelo na classe das motos naked de média cilindrada. Uma moto que pode ser movida de forma tão desportiva não mereceria ser abusada como motor de passeio ou de viagem.

Menos peso

melhor desempenho

manuseamento ligeiro

extremamente prático nas curvas

posição vertical.

ABS não incluído - mas não é muito caro para comprar.

Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Ducati Monster 696 vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R

There are a few key differences between a Ducati Monster 696 2008 and a Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 7. It takes less time to sell a Ducati Monster 696 with 56 days compared to 73 days for a Triumph Street Triple 675 R. Since model year 2008 1000PS.de editors have written 9 reviews for the Ducati Monster 696 and 16 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R since model year 2009. The first review for the Ducati Monster 696 was published on 08/11/2007 and now has more than 7.300 views. This compares to more than 13.000 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple 675 R published on 20/07/2008.

Preço Ducati Monster 696

Ano do modelo
Preços médios de mercado actuais

Preço Triumph Street Triple 675 R

Ano do modelo
Preços médios de mercado actuais

Comparações alternativas

Parceiro 1000PS

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen