BMW R 1250 GS Adventure 2023 vs. KTM 1290 Super Adventure S 2017

In terms of the technical specifications, the BMW R 1250 GS Adventure 2023 is equipped with a Boxer engine, with a bore of 102.5 mm and a stroke of 76 mm. It has a power output of 136 HP and a torque of 143 Nm. The transmission is a shaft drive, and it has a displacement of 1254 ccm. The front suspension consists of a Telelever system with a diameter of 37 mm and a travel of 210 mm, while the rear suspension is a single swingarm with a monoshock and a travel of 220 mm. The frame is made of steel, and the rake and trail measurements are 65.1 degrees and 95.4 mm, respectively. The front brakes are dual disc, and the bike is equipped with advanced driver assistance systems such as ABS, traction control, hill start assist, electronically adjustable suspension, riding modes, ABS for curves, and ride-by-wire. The front tire has a diameter of 19 inches, and the rear tire has a width of 170 mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase is 1504 mm, and the seat height ranges from 890 mm to 910 mm. The bike weighs 268 kg with ABS and has a fuel tank capacity of 30 liters. Additional features include cornering lights, LED daytime running lights, LED headlights, heated seat, TFT display, and adjustable windscreen.

On the other hand, the KTM 1290 Super Adventure S 2017 is equipped with a V-type engine, with a bore of 108 mm and a stroke of 71 mm. It has a power output of 160 HP and a torque of 140 Nm. The transmission is a chain drive, and it has a displacement of 1301 ccm. The front suspension consists of a telescopic upside-down fork with a diameter of 48 mm and a travel of 200 mm, while the rear suspension is a swingarm with a monoshock and a travel of 200 mm. The frame is made of chromium-molybdenum, and the rake and trail measurements are 64 degrees and 120 mm, respectively. The front brakes are dual disc, and the bike is equipped with ABS, electronically adjustable suspension, riding modes, ride-by-wire, and traction control. The front tire has a diameter of 19 inches, and the rear tire has a width of 170 mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase is 1560 mm, and the seat height ranges from 860 mm to 875 mm. The bike weighs 238 kg with ABS and has a fuel tank capacity of 23 liters. Additional features include heated grips, cornering lights, LED headlights, and adjustable windscreen.

BMW R 1250 GS Adventure 2023

In terms of strengths, the BMW R 1250 GS Adventure 2023 has a high torque engine that accelerates strongly from low revs. Its low center of gravity ensures surprisingly accessible maneuverability. It also has practical details for frequent riders, a huge range of 600 km, incredibly low fuel consumption, good wind and weather protection, and great riding comfort. The bike is equipped with a powerful engine and an excellent electronic system, with an easy-to-read display. The rider feels confident on the saddle, and the bike offers practical riding aids. Additionally, it has excellent ergonomics for tall people.

On the other hand, the KTM 1290 Super Adventure S 2017 has a powerful engine and precise handling. The traction control system adds a fun factor to the riding experience, and the bike comes with ABS for curves, a large and easy-to-read TFT display, quick-shifting lever, LED headlights with cornering lights, and off-road capability.

In terms of weaknesses, the BMW R 1250 GS Adventure 2023 has a high weight, and the gear changes at low revs can be somewhat awkward. The bike has an irregular appearance with little elegance, and the price is high with all the equipment included.

KTM 1290 Super Adventure S 2017

Similarly, the KTM 1290 Super Adventure S 2017 has a high price, and the height adjustment of the windscreen consumes a lot of energy.

In conclusion, both the BMW R 1250 GS Adventure 2023 and the KTM 1290 Super Adventure S 2017 have their strengths and weaknesses. The BMW offers a powerful engine, low center of gravity, practical details, and excellent electronic systems. On the other hand, the KTM provides a powerful engine, precise handling, and off-road capability. The decision between the two will ultimately depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.