KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 vs. Husqvarna FE 350 2016
KTM 350 EXC-F 2016
Husqvarna FE 350 2016
Visão geral - KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 vs Husqvarna FE 350 2016
The KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 and the Husqvarna FE 350 2016 are both enduro motorcycles with similar technical specifications. They have the same bore and stroke measurements, as well as the same number of cylinders and displacement. Both bikes also feature a telescopic fork suspension system from WP, as well as a steel frame with a central tube design. The front tire diameter is 21 inches, and the rear tire width is 140 mm, with an 18-inch diameter. The wheelbase and seat height are also identical for both models.
In terms of differences, the KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 has an electric start system in addition to a kick start, while the Husqvarna FE 350 2016 only has a kick start. The KTM model also has a slightly lower dry weight of 107.2 kg compared to the Husqvarna's 109.2 kg. Additionally, the Husqvarna FE 350 2016 has a slightly larger fuel tank capacity of 9.5 liters, compared to the KTM's 9 liters.
KTM 350 EXC-F 2016
In terms of strengths, the KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 is described as powerful, agile, and fast, making it a true competition machine. It combines the advantages of a four-stroke engine (engine response, fuel consumption, etc.) with lightweight and sufficient power. On the other hand, the Husqvarna FE 350 2016 is praised for being possibly the fastest machine on any special stage. It offers a great balance between ease of handling and good performance.
Husqvarna FE 350 2016
However, both models have their weaknesses. The KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 is said to be more radical than the 250 and slightly more nervous than the 450. It requires more concentration but also offers more speed. The traction has improved but is still not perfect, leading riders to sometimes desire a 450. The Husqvarna FE 350 2016 is described as clearly more aggressive than the FE 250, and therefore, it is also more energy-consuming.
In summary, both the KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 and the Husqvarna FE 350 2016 are powerful and agile enduro motorcycles with similar technical specifications. The KTM model has the advantage of an electric start system and a slightly lower weight, while the Husqvarna model is praised for its speed and balance between handling and performance. However, the KTM model can be more demanding to ride, and the Husqvarna model is more energy-consuming.
Especificações técnicas KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 em comparação com Husqvarna FE 350 2016
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
KTM 350 EXC-F 2016
O sucesso de bilheteira dos últimos anos foi melhorado com precisão. A gama de rotações utilizáveis foi alargada, tornando a 350 um pouco mais fácil de conduzir do que antes. Mas continua a ser a máquina mais radical entre os modelos a 4 tempos. Ela combina as vantagens da "250" e da "450", mas também as suas desvantagens. No entanto: 90% de todos os clientes da KTM farão o tempo mais rápido no teste especial com a 350 EXC-F. É a recomendação de compra mais universal para os pilotos de enduro.
Husqvarna FE 350 2016
A moto universal da Husky, pode fazer praticamente tudo. E como algo entre a 250 e a 450, combina as vantagens de ambos os modelos. Também se tornou um pouco mais forte em 2017 e agora é mais comparável à 450 em termos de capacidade de resposta.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado KTM 350 EXC-F vs Husqvarna FE 350
There are a few key differences between a KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 and a Husqvarna FE 350 2016. It takes less time to sell a Husqvarna FE 350 with 44 days compared to 76 days for the KTM 350 EXC-F. Since model year 2011 1000PS.de editors have written 18 reviews for the KTM 350 EXC-F and 9 reviews for the Husqvarna FE 350 since model year 2014. The first review for the KTM 350 EXC-F was published on 02/11/2010 and now has more than 10.800 views. This compares to more than 91.700 views for the first review on Husqvarna FE 350 published on 14/07/2016.
