KTM 690 SMC 2008 vs. KTM 625 SMC 2005
KTM 690 SMC 2008
KTM 625 SMC 2005
Pregled - KTM 690 SMC 2008 vs KTM 625 SMC 2005
The KTM 690 SMC model year 2008 and the KTM 625 SMC model year 2005 are both supermoto motorcycles that offer unique features and capabilities.
Starting with the technical specifications, the KTM 690 SMC 2008 has a more powerful engine with 62 HP compared to the 31 HP of the KTM 625 SMC 2005. The 690 SMC also has a larger displacement of 654ccm, while the 625 SMC has a displacement of 625ccm. In terms of dimensions and weights, the 625 SMC has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1510mm compared to the 1472mm of the 690 SMC. The seat height is also slightly higher for the 625 SMC at 910mm compared to the 900mm of the 690 SMC. However, the 690 SMC is lighter with a dry weight of 139.5kg, while the 625 SMC weighs 146kg.
KTM 690 SMC 2008
In terms of strengths, the KTM 690 SMC 2008 is a fully-fledged supermoto with a relatively low weight, making it agile and easy to handle. It is also very suitable for off-road use, allowing riders to tackle various terrains. The sporty look of the 690 SMC adds to its appeal.
On the other hand, the KTM 625 SMC 2005 has its own strengths. It features a steel rear, which adds durability and stability to the motorcycle. It is also approved for two persons, making it suitable for riding with a passenger. The 625 SMC is designed for everyday use and comes with an electric starter, making it convenient and easy to start. The high-quality details of the 625 SMC add to its overall appeal, providing a premium feel. Additionally, the 625 SMC offers a comfortable riding experience.
Moving on to weaknesses, the KTM 690 SMC 2008 has suboptimal wind protection, which can be a drawback for riders looking for a more comfortable and protected riding experience. The comfort level of the 690 SMC is also somewhat low, which may not be ideal for long rides. Additionally, the airbox of the 690 SMC produces loud background noise, which can be bothersome for some riders.
KTM 625 SMC 2005
On the other hand, the KTM 625 SMC 2005 has a slightly outdated headlight mask, which may not be as visually appealing as newer models. It is also not recommended for beginners due to its higher power output and potentially more challenging handling. Lastly, the 625 SMC is slightly heavier than racing supermotos, which may affect its agility and maneuverability in certain situations.
In conclusion, both the KTM 690 SMC 2008 and the KTM 625 SMC 2005 have their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The 690 SMC offers a more powerful engine and lower weight, making it suitable for off-road use and providing a sporty look. On the other hand, the 625 SMC offers a comfortable riding experience and is designed for everyday use. Ultimately, the choice between the two models depends on the rider's preferences and intended use of the motorcycle.
Tehničke specifikacije KTM 690 SMC 2008 u odnosu na KTM 625 SMC 2005
Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na
Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na
KTM 690 SMC 2008
Actually, everything fits except for the looks. This is where KTM now pulls the lever and delivers an impeccable overall concept - plus, of course, better riding performance.
KTM 625 SMC 2005
For power freaks, the KTM 625SMC is an excellent compromise in road use. The iron marches splendidly, has an e-start, reasonable service intervals and also offers some comfort. In terms of handling and agility, it can't quite keep up with the two lightweights 450 Husky and 650 Berg.
Usporedba cijena Prosječna tržišna cijena KTM 690 SMC vs KTM 625 SMC
There are a few key differences between a KTM 690 SMC 2008 and a KTM 625 SMC 2005. It takes less time to sell a KTM 625 SMC with 35 days compared to 46 days for the KTM 690 SMC. Since model year 2008 1000PS.de editors have written 6 reviews for the KTM 690 SMC and 1 review for the KTM 625 SMC since model year 2005. The first review for the KTM 690 SMC was published on 9/28/2007 and now has more than 20,300 views. This compares to more than 105,000 views for the first review on KTM 625 SMC published on 5/18/2005.
