Yamaha XSR900 2018 vs. Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Yamaha XSR900 2018

Yamaha XSR900 2018

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Loading...

Pregled - Yamaha XSR900 2018 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

The Yamaha XSR900 2018 and the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, cooling systems, and frame types. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 has a slight advantage with 135 HP compared to the Yamaha XSR900 2018's 115 HP. The Triumph also has a higher torque of 111 Nm compared to the Yamaha's 87.5 Nm. This gives the Triumph a more powerful and responsive feel on the road.

Both bikes have three cylinders and liquid cooling, ensuring efficient heat dissipation and optimal engine performance. The Yamaha has a displacement of 847 ccm, while the Triumph has a larger displacement of 1050 ccm. This means the Triumph may have a slight edge in terms of overall power and acceleration.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front. However, some riders have found the Showa suspension elements on the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 to be slightly uncomfortable, potentially affecting the overall riding experience. The Yamaha XSR900 2018 does not have any reported issues with its suspension.

Yamaha XSR900 2018

Yamaha XSR900 2018

Both bikes have aluminum frames with twin tube designs, providing stability and durability. The Yamaha XSR900 2018 has a wheelbase of 1440 mm, slightly longer than the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013's 1435 mm. This may contribute to the Yamaha's more stable and planted feel on the road.

In terms of tire dimensions, both bikes have a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. However, the Triumph has a wider rear tire width of 190 mm compared to the Yamaha's 180 mm. This may provide the Triumph with better traction and stability during cornering.

The Yamaha XSR900 2018 has a lower seat height of 815 mm compared to the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013's 825 mm. This may make the Yamaha more accessible to riders of shorter stature.

In terms of weight, the Yamaha XSR900 2018 is lighter with a kerb weight of 188 kg compared to the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013's 214 kg. This lighter weight may contribute to the Yamaha's more agile and maneuverable feel on the road.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Both bikes have fuel tank capacities that differ, with the Triumph having a larger capacity of 17.5 liters compared to the Yamaha's 14 liters. This may give the Triumph a longer range between refueling stops.

In terms of strengths, the Yamaha XSR900 2018 is praised for its extremely sporty and rev-happy engine, excellent brakes, and pleasant seating position. It is also highly regarded for its high-quality workmanship and good price-performance ratio. On the other hand, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 is praised for its powerful three-cylinder engine, sporty driving feel, upright seating position, and stable frame.

As for weaknesses, the Yamaha XSR900 2018 is criticized for its almost too direct throttle response and retro style that may not be thought through to the last detail. The Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 has been noted to have slightly uncomfortable Showa suspension elements and stubborn handling.

In conclusion, both the Yamaha XSR900 2018 and the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 have their strengths and weaknesses. The Yamaha offers a sporty and rev-happy engine, excellent brakes, and a pleasant seating position, while the Triumph provides a powerful engine, sporty driving feel, and a stable frame. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Tehničke specifikacije Yamaha XSR900 2018 u odnosu na Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Yamaha XSR900 2018
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Motor i pogonski sustav

Vrsta motoraVrsta motoraUgrađenoVrsta motoraUgrađeno
ProvrtProvrt78 mmProvrt79 mm
TaktTakt59.1 mmTakt71.4 mm
Snaga motoraSnaga motora115 KSSnaga motora135 KS
Broj okretaja pri maksimalnoj snaziBroj okretaja pri maksimalnoj snazi10,000 okr./minBroj okretaja pri maksimalnoj snazi9,400 okr./min
Okretni momentOkretni moment87.5 NmOkretni moment111 Nm
Broj okretaja pri okretnom momentuBroj okretaja pri okretnom momentu8,500 okr./minBroj okretaja pri okretnom momentu7,750 okr./min
Stupanj kompresijeStupanj kompresije11.5 Stupanj kompresije12
Vrsta spojkeVrsta spojkeViše ploča u uljnoj kupkiVrsta spojkeViše ploča u uljnoj kupki
PrijenosPrijenosLanacPrijenosLanac
Broj brzinaBroj brzina6Broj brzina6
CilindriCilindri3Cilindri3
Ventila po cilindruVentila po cilindru4Ventila po cilindru4
VentiliVentiliDOHCVentiliDOHC
HlađenjeHlađenjetekućinaHlađenjetekućina
PomakPomak847 ccmPomak1,050 ccm

Prednji ovjes

Prednji ovjesPrednji ovjesPreokrenuta teleskopska vilicaPrednji ovjesPreokrenuta teleskopska vilica

Šasija

OkvirOkvirAluminijOkvirAluminij
Vrsta okviraVrsta okviraDvije ispušne cijeviVrsta okviraDvije ispušne cijevi

Stražnje kočnice

VrstaVrstaDiskVrstaDisk

Dimenzije i težina

Širina prednje gumeŠirina prednje gume120 mmŠirina prednje gume120 mm
Visina prednje gumeVisina prednje gume70 %Visina prednje gume70 %
Promjer prednje gumePromjer prednje gume17 inčPromjer prednje gume17 inč
Širina stražnje gumeŠirina stražnje gume180 mmŠirina stražnje gume190 mm
Visina stražnje gumeVisina stražnje gume55 %Visina stražnje gume55 %
Promjer stražnje gumePromjer stražnje gume17 inčPromjer stražnje gume17 inč
DužinaDužina2,075 mmDužina2,100 mm
ŠirinaŠirina815 mmŠirina795 mm
VisinaVisina1,135 mmVisina1,110 mm
Međuosovinski razmakMeđuosovinski razmak1,440 mmMeđuosovinski razmak1,435 mm
Visina sjedalaVisina sjedala815 mmVisina sjedala825 mm
Težina neopterećenog vozilaTežina neopterećenog vozila188 kgTežina neopterećenog vozila214 kg
Kapacitet spremnika za gorivoKapacitet spremnika za gorivo14 l (nisko)Kapacitet spremnika za gorivo17.5 l (nisko)
Sukladnost licenceSukladnost licenceASukladnost licenceA

Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na

Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na

Yamaha XSR900 2018

Yamaha XSR900 2018

The Yamaha XSR900 is a classic optical illusion - with its round headlight, angular tank and attached tail light, it clearly passes for a retro bike. But it's no coincidence that the performance is reminiscent of the potent mid-range naked bike Yamaha MT-09, which is the extremely sporty basis for the XSR900. So the engine is a blast and the brakes are appropriately venomous. Fortunately, the engineers didn't overdo it with the chassis, the XSR900 offers sufficient comfort and the upright riding position is more comfortable than the powerful engine would lead one to expect. All in all, the XSR900 is one of the sportiest models among the retro bikes.

Extremely sporty and rev-happy engine

excellent brakes

riding at naked bike level

pleasant seating position

high-quality workmanship

price-performance ratio.

almost too direct response

retro style not thought through to the last detail

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

More power, more kilos, more rubber . It is certainly not the most manageable, which makes climbing the Tyrolean mountains over hundreds of hairpin bends exhausting at times. But it is more mature than the Street Triple, knows how to glide along the valley smoothly and without getting on your nerves, and for some reason feels more trustworthy and secure.

Powerful three-cylinder engine

sporty driving feel

upright seating

stable frame.

Showa suspension elements slightly uncomfortable

stubborn handling.

Usporedba cijena Prosječna tržišna cijena Yamaha XSR900 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha XSR900 2018 and a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 is about 3% higher. Compared to Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 there are less Yamaha XSR900 2018 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 4 compared to 5. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 with 66 days compared to 123 days for the Yamaha XSR900. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 and 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 since model year 2005. The first review for the Yamaha XSR900 was published on 11/25/2015 and now has more than 17,600 views. This compares to more than 16,200 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple 1050 published on 10/2/2007.

Cijena Yamaha XSR900

Godina proizvodnje modela
Trenutačne prosječne tržišne cijene

Cijena Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Godina proizvodnje modela
Trenutačne prosječne tržišne cijene

Alternativne usporedbe

Partner platforme 1000PS

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG