Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 vs. Yamaha MT-07 2018
Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022
Yamaha MT-07 2018
Pregled - Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 vs Yamaha MT-07 2018
The Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 and the Yamaha MT-07 2018 are both naked bikes with similar engine types and cooling systems. However, there are several notable differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 boasts a significantly higher output with 152 HP compared to the Yamaha MT-07 2018's 75 HP. This makes the Suzuki model more suitable for riders who crave a powerful and thrilling performance.
The torque figures also differ, with the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 offering 106 Nm compared to the Yamaha MT-07 2018's 68 Nm. This means that the Suzuki model will have better acceleration and pulling power.
Another difference lies in the number of cylinders. The Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 has four cylinders, while the Yamaha MT-07 2018 has only two. More cylinders generally result in smoother power delivery and a more refined engine performance.
The chassis materials also vary between the two models. The Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 features an aluminum frame, which is known for its lightweight and rigid properties. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-07 2018 has a steel frame, which may be slightly heavier but provides excellent stability and durability.
Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022
When it comes to braking, both bikes are equipped with double disk brakes at the front. This ensures strong and reliable stopping power for both models.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 has a wider front tire width of 120 mm compared to the Yamaha MT-07 2018's 120 mm. The rear tire width of the Suzuki model is also wider at 190 mm, while the Yamaha model has a rear tire width of 180 mm. These differences may affect the handling and stability of the bikes.
The wheelbase of the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 is longer at 1460 mm compared to the Yamaha MT-07 2018's 1400 mm. A longer wheelbase generally results in better stability and straight-line performance.
In terms of seat height, the Yamaha MT-07 2018 has a slightly lower seat height at 805 mm compared to the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022's 810 mm. This may be more suitable for riders with shorter inseams.
Yamaha MT-07 2018
The kerb weight of the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 is higher at 214 kg compared to the Yamaha MT-07 2018's 182 kg. This may affect the maneuverability and agility of the bikes.
Lastly, the fuel tank capacity of the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 is larger at 19 liters compared to the Yamaha MT-07 2018's 14 liters. This means that the Suzuki model may have a longer range before needing to refuel.
In terms of strengths, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 offers a superior engine, excellent shift assistant including blipper, balanced handling, bold design, comfortable seating position, and a very good price. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-07 2018 excels in extremely agile engine performance, very light handling, low weight, aggressively angular look, powerful brakes, comfortable seating position, and a throaty sound.
However, both models have their weaknesses. The Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 lacks a comprehensive electronics package, such as a 6-axis IMU and cornering ABS. Additionally, the instruments on the handlebars may be somewhat antiquated and not particularly easy to read. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-07 2018 has a chassis that may be a little soft, footrests that drag quickly, some cheap plastic parts, a boring telescopic fork, and instruments that could be easier to read.
In conclusion, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 and the Yamaha MT-07 2018 have their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The Suzuki model offers a more powerful engine and a higher level of technology, while the Yamaha model excels in agility and a sporty design. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Tehničke specifikacije Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 u odnosu na Yamaha MT-07 2018
Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na
Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na
Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022
The new GSX-S1000 is an old acquaintance in terms of basic design - the engine and chassis are still from the predecessor. However, the machine has been modernised in many areas and presents itself at an extremely high level, especially visually. Although the engine cannot compete in the league of the super-potent Hyper Nakeds, it functions very harmoniously and powerfully enough. The conventional chassis also strikes a successful compromise between sportiness and comfort. The hammer arguments are definitely the successful design, the standard quickshifter with blipper and, last but not least, the comparatively low price.
Yamaha MT-07 2018
The MT-07 is an incredible fun machine that is extremely sporty to ride. The brakes pack a punch, the handling is superb and the engine is currently by far the most agile power unit in this class - and even above. The light handling fits in perfectly and the aggressive design with its many corners and edges is also appealing. Only the chassis makes the typically good compromise between comfort and sport and should probably remind you that the affordable MT-07 also has a lot to offer beginners.
Usporedba cijena Prosječna tržišna cijena Suzuki GSX-S1000 vs Yamaha MT-07
There are a few key differences between a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 and a Yamaha MT-07 2018. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 is about 94% higher. A Suzuki GSX-S1000 2022 experiences a loss of 1,510 USD in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 150 USD for a Yamaha MT-07 2018. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 28. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-07 with 54 days compared to 130 days for the Suzuki GSX-S1000. Since model year 2015 1000PS.de editors have written 36 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 and 69 reviews for the Yamaha MT-07 since model year 2013. The first review for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 was published on 9/27/2014 and now has more than 17,100 views. This compares to more than 12,600 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-07 published on 11/4/2013.
