Honda CRF250L 2013 vs. Honda CRF250M 2013

The Honda CRF250L and Honda CRF250M are both models from the year 2013, with similar technical specifications. Both bikes have a 249cc engine with a bore of 76mm and a stroke of 55mm. They also have the same engine power of 23 horsepower and torque of 22 Nm. Both models feature an electric starter and a chain transmission.

In terms of suspension, both the CRF250L and CRF250M have an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension and Showa brand suspension in the rear. The chassis of both bikes is made of steel, providing durability and stability.

However, there are some notable differences between the two models. The CRF250L has a front tire diameter of 21 inches, while the CRF250M has a smaller front tire diameter of 17 inches. The rear tire width of the CRF250L is 120mm, whereas the CRF250M has a wider rear tire width of 130mm. Additionally, the CRF250L has a rear tire diameter of 18 inches, while the CRF250M has a rear tire diameter of 17 inches. These differences in tire sizes may affect the handling and agility of the bikes.

Honda CRF250L 2013

In terms of dimensions and weights, both models have a wheelbase of around 1445-1446mm. However, the seat height of the CRF250L is slightly higher at 875mm compared to the CRF250M's seat height of 855mm. The kerb weight of the CRF250L is 144kg, while the CRF250M is slightly heavier at 145kg. Both models have a fuel tank capacity of 7.7 liters.

Moving on to the strengths of each model, the CRF250L is praised for its harmonious chassis tuning, making it easy to ride on various terrains. It also offers a comfortable and upright seating position, making it suitable for longer rides. The CRF250L is considered manageable and provides an uncomplicated riding experience.

Honda CRF250M 2013

On the other hand, the CRF250M is commended for its positive geometry and good handling. It is also described as solid and robust, giving riders a sense of confidence. The CRF250M is considered to have acceptable looks, appealing to riders who value aesthetics.

However, both models have their weaknesses. The CRF250L's brakes could be applied with more force, and the hand force required to operate them could be improved. The CRF250M, on the other hand, is criticized for its relatively high weight, which may affect its agility. It also has a weak braking system, which may impact its overall performance and safety.

In conclusion, the Honda CRF250L and Honda CRF250M are similar in many aspects, including their engine specifications and suspension. However, they differ in tire sizes, seat height, weight, and braking system. The CRF250L is praised for its comfortable and easy-to-ride nature, while the CRF250M is commended for its handling and robustness. Both models have their weaknesses, with the CRF250L needing improvements in its brakes and the CRF250M being relatively heavy and having a weak braking system.