BMW G 310 R 2016 vs. Royal Enfield HNTR 350 2023
BMW G 310 R 2016
Royal Enfield HNTR 350 2023
Pregled - BMW G 310 R 2016 vs Royal Enfield HNTR 350 2023
The BMW G 310 R model year 2016 and the Royal Enfield HNTR 350 model year 2023 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. However, there are some notable differences between the two.
In terms of engine power, the BMW G 310 R has a higher output with 34 HP compared to the Royal Enfield HNTR 350's 20.2 HP. This means that the BMW offers more power and potentially better acceleration.
When it comes to torque, the BMW G 310 R has 28 Nm while the Royal Enfield HNTR 350 has 27 Nm. Although the difference is minimal, the BMW may offer slightly better low-end power and responsiveness.
Both bikes have fuel injection systems and a single cylinder engine configuration. However, the cooling systems differ, with the BMW utilizing liquid cooling and the Royal Enfield using oil-air cooling. Liquid cooling generally provides better heat dissipation and can result in more consistent performance.
BMW G 310 R 2016
In terms of suspension, the BMW G 310 R features an upside-down telescopic fork at the front and a swing arm with a monoshock at the rear. On the other hand, the Royal Enfield HNTR 350 has a telescopic fork at the front and a swing arm with dual shocks at the rear. The BMW's suspension setup may offer better stability and handling, especially during aggressive riding.
Both bikes have steel frames, but the BMW G 310 R has a tubular frame while the Royal Enfield HNTR 350 has a double cradle frame. The choice of frame design can affect the bike's handling characteristics and overall rigidity.
In terms of brakes, both bikes have single disk brakes with a diameter of 300 mm at the front. This ensures effective stopping power for both models.
Both bikes are equipped with ABS, which is an advanced rider assistance system that enhances safety by preventing wheel lock-up during braking.
Royal Enfield HNTR 350 2023
In terms of dimensions and weights, the BMW G 310 R has a front tire width of 110 mm and a rear tire width of 150 mm, while the Royal Enfield HNTR 350 has a front tire width of 110 mm and a rear tire width of 140 mm. Both bikes have 17-inch wheels. The wheelbase is similar for both models, with the BMW measuring 1374 mm and the Royal Enfield measuring 1370 mm. The seat height is slightly higher on the Royal Enfield at 800 mm compared to the BMW's 785 mm. The kerb weight of the BMW G 310 R is 158.5 kg with ABS, while the Royal Enfield HNTR 350 weighs 181 kg with ABS. The fuel tank capacity is also larger on the Royal Enfield at 13 liters compared to the BMW's 11 liters.
In terms of strengths, the BMW G 310 R is praised for its handling, weight, ingenious chassis, and stability. On the other hand, the Royal Enfield HNTR 350 is commended for its extremely easy and good-natured handling, good workmanship, timeless design, fine engine tuning, and voluminous sound.
As for weaknesses, the BMW G 310 R is criticized for its brake pedal, although specific details are not provided. The Royal Enfield HNTR 350 is said to have a little top speed for motorways and manageable top performance, suggesting that it may not be as suitable for high-speed riding.
In conclusion, the BMW G 310 R and the Royal Enfield HNTR 350 have their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The BMW offers more power, better handling, and a lighter weight, while the Royal Enfield provides easy handling, good workmanship, and a timeless design. The choice between the two would depend on the rider's preferences and intended usage.
Tehničke specifikacije BMW G 310 R 2016 u odnosu na Royal Enfield HNTR 350 2023
Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na
Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na
BMW G 310 R 2016
On the first few metres, I briefly thought that the power was a bit lacking. However, after a while it quickly became clear that power is not everything and that ultimate driving pleasure can be guaranteed even with little horsepower. In the US, there are traffic rules called "lane splitting", which means moving forward between cars when there is a traffic jam. Before the traffic lights, for example. I have to admit that I didn't feel so comfortable here at the beginning. A Porsche on the left, a Dodge on the right, you really don't want to swerve with your bike. However, the handlebars of the BMW G310R are rather narrow and you can really cheat your way forward through the queues of cars without a second thought! The only shortcoming I noticed right at the start is the brake pedal. Unfortunately, it's a bit far down. The rear brake was also a little late in engaging. But that can certainly be optimised with an adjustment. All in all, it is a very successful bike. It is super versatile, really fun in every area and you feel comfortable from the first moment! Depending on the rev range you are in, you can adapt the bike to your riding style. Cruising at low revs and super sporty riding at high revs! The perfect all-round roadster at a great price.
Royal Enfield HNTR 350 2023
Both sister models have already convinced us, as has the Hunter 350. The price-performance ratio is extremely attractive. Driving the Hunter is so easy and uncomplicated - great. The only criticism that could be levelled at it is the manageable engine power. Therefore, for many people it will be more of an emotional second or third bike. But one that you'll love to ride, because it's sure to attract a lot of attention and you'll quickly realise that sometimes less really is more. And: In Europe, the Hunter 350 is currently unrivalled.
Usporedba cijena Prosječna tržišna cijena BMW G 310 R vs Royal Enfield HNTR 350
There are a few key differences between a BMW G 310 R 2016 and a Royal Enfield HNTR 350 2023. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the BMW G 310 R and 4 reviews for the Royal Enfield HNTR 350 since model year 2022. The first review for the BMW G 310 R was published on 10/7/2015 and now has more than 28,500 views. This compares to more than 43,200 views for the first review on Royal Enfield HNTR 350 published on 8/10/2022.
