BMW K 1300 R 2009 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2016
BMW K 1300 R 2009
BMW S 1000 R 2016
Pregled - BMW K 1300 R 2009 vs BMW S 1000 R 2016
The BMW K 1300 R model year 2009 and the BMW S 1000 R model year 2016 are both naked bikes from BMW, but they have some notable differences in terms of technical specifications and strengths.
In terms of engine and drive train, both bikes have an in-line engine type. However, the BMW K 1300 R 2009 has a higher engine power of 173 HP compared to the BMW S 1000 R 2016, which has 160 HP. The torque of the BMW K 1300 R 2009 is also higher at 140 Nm, while the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a torque of 112 Nm. The displacement of the BMW K 1300 R 2009 is 1293 ccm, while the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a displacement of 999 ccm.
BMW K 1300 R 2009
In terms of suspension, the BMW K 1300 R 2009 has a front suspension of strut and a rear suspension of paralever. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has an upside-down telescopic fork for the front suspension and a swing arm for the rear suspension.
Both bikes have double disk brakes with four pistons in the front. They also have the same front and rear tire diameter of 17 inches. However, the BMW K 1300 R 2009 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1585 mm compared to the BMW S 1000 R 2016, which has a wheelbase of 1439 mm. The seat height of the BMW K 1300 R 2009 is also slightly higher at 820 mm, while the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a seat height of 814 mm. The fuel tank capacity of the BMW K 1300 R 2009 is 19 liters, while the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters.
In terms of strengths, the BMW K 1300 R 2009 has sharp looks, plenty of power, comfort, a relaxed ride, and optimized systems such as ABS, RDC, EVO, ASC, and ESA 2. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a powerful and well-controllable engine, a powerful braking system, and a comfortable seating position.
BMW S 1000 R 2016
However, the BMW K 1300 R 2009 has a weakness in its curve settling-in period at the beginning. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has weaknesses in the form of expensive optional extras and a hard chassis.
Overall, both bikes have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them would depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Tehničke specifikacije BMW K 1300 R 2009 u odnosu na BMW S 1000 R 2016
Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na
Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na
BMW K 1300 R 2009
The throttle grip is pulled open, the K pushes forward and then, when you take a short break on other motorbikes, you simply stay fully on the throttle with the souped-up K and push in the next gear. A real gem for demanding races.
BMW S 1000 R 2016
With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.
Usporedba cijena Prosječna tržišna cijena BMW K 1300 R vs BMW S 1000 R
There are a few key differences between a BMW K 1300 R 2009 and a BMW S 1000 R 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2016 is about 44% higher. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2016 there are less BMW K 1300 R 2009 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 5 compared to 10. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 69 days compared to 81 days for the BMW K 1300 R. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 7 reviews for the BMW K 1300 R and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the BMW K 1300 R was published on 10/9/2008 and now has more than 20,400 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 11/3/2013.
