BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs. Kawasaki Z900 2019

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Loading...

Pregled - BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs Kawasaki Z900 2019

The BMW S 1000 R 2016 and the Kawasaki Z900 2019 are both naked bikes that offer powerful performance and a comfortable riding experience. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine specifications, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 is equipped with a 999cc in-line four-cylinder engine that produces 160 horsepower and 112 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 2019 features a slightly smaller 948cc in-line four-cylinder engine that delivers 125.4 horsepower and 98.6 Nm of torque. While both bikes have four cylinders and similar engine types, the BMW offers more power and torque.

When it comes to suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension at the rear. The BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a monoshock rear shock absorber, while the Kawasaki Z900 2019 also utilizes a monoshock setup. Both bikes provide a comfortable and stable ride, with the BMW offering the additional feature of dynamic suspension as part of its advanced rider assistance systems.

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

In terms of chassis, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, while the Kawasaki Z900 2019 features a steel frame with a double cradle design. The choice of materials and frame design can affect the overall weight and handling characteristics of the bikes.

Both bikes are equipped with double disc brakes at the front, with four-piston calipers providing excellent stopping power. The BMW S 1000 R 2016 utilizes radial technology for its front brakes, while the Kawasaki Z900 2019 features petal technology. The choice of braking technology can influence the feel and performance of the brakes.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 190 mm, while the Kawasaki Z900 2019 has a slightly narrower rear tire width of 180 mm. The wheelbase of the BMW is 1439 mm, while the Kawasaki has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1450 mm. The seat height of the BMW is 814 mm, while the Kawasaki offers a slightly lower seat height of 795 mm. The kerb weight of the BMW is 207 kg with ABS, while the Kawasaki weighs slightly more at 210 kg with ABS.

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Kawasaki Z900 2019

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 is praised for its powerful and well-controllable engine, powerful braking system, and comfortable seating position. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 2019 is commended for its light and natural handling, high stability, silky engine with full pull from mid revs, high chassis transparency, and great feedback. The Z900 also offers a sitting position with a feel-good factor and a fair price.

However, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 does have some weaknesses, including expensive optional extras and a hard chassis. The Kawasaki Z900 2019 has its own weaknesses, such as a TFT display mounted too low, cumbersome menu operation, and rear view mirrors that offer modest visibility.

In conclusion, both the BMW S 1000 R 2016 and the Kawasaki Z900 2019 are powerful naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. The BMW excels in terms of engine power and braking performance, while the Kawasaki offers a lighter and more agile handling experience. Both bikes have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between the two ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Tehničke specifikacije BMW S 1000 R 2016 u odnosu na Kawasaki Z900 2019

BMW S 1000 R 2016
Kawasaki Z900 2019

Motor i pogonski sustav

Vrsta motoraVrsta motoraUgrađenoVrsta motoraUgrađeno
ProvrtProvrt80 mmProvrt73.4 mm
TaktTakt49.7 mmTakt56 mm
Snaga motoraSnaga motora160 KSSnaga motora125.4 KS
Broj okretaja pri maksimalnoj snaziBroj okretaja pri maksimalnoj snazi11,000 okr./minBroj okretaja pri maksimalnoj snazi9,500 okr./min
Okretni momentOkretni moment112 NmOkretni moment98.6 Nm
Broj okretaja pri okretnom momentuBroj okretaja pri okretnom momentu9,250 okr./minBroj okretaja pri okretnom momentu7,700 okr./min
Stupanj kompresijeStupanj kompresije12 Stupanj kompresije11.8
Vrsta spojkeVrsta spojkeViše ploča u uljnoj kupki, Zaštita od blokiranja stražnjeg kotačaVrsta spojkeViše ploča u uljnoj kupki
PrijenosPrijenosLanacPrijenosLanac
Broj brzinaBroj brzina6Broj brzina6
CilindriCilindri4Cilindri4
TaktTaktČetverotaktniTaktČetverotaktni
PomakPomak999 ccmPomak948 ccm

Prednji ovjes

Prednji ovjesPrednji ovjesPreokrenuta teleskopska vilicaPrednji ovjesPreokrenuta teleskopska vilica
PromjerPromjer46 mmPromjer41 mm

Stražnji ovjes

OvjesOvjesStražnji ovjesOvjesStražnji ovjes
AmortizerAmortizerJednostruki ovjesAmortizerJednostruki ovjes

Šasija

OkvirOkvirAluminijOkvirČelik
Vrsta okviraVrsta okviraDvije ispušne cijeviVrsta okviraDvostruka podloga

Prednje kočnice

VrstaVrstaDva diskaVrstaDva diska
KlipKlipČetiri klipaKlipČetiri klipa
TehnologijaTehnologijaradijalnoTehnologijaLatica

Stražnje kočnice

VrstaVrstaDiskVrstaDisk
KlipKlipJedan klipKlipJedan klip

Sustavi za pomoć

Napredni sustavi za pomoć vozačuNapredni sustavi za pomoć vozačuDinamički ovjesNapredni sustavi za pomoć vozačuABS

Dimenzije i težina

Širina prednje gumeŠirina prednje gume120 mmŠirina prednje gume120 mm
Visina prednje gumeVisina prednje gume70 %Visina prednje gume70 %
Promjer prednje gumePromjer prednje gume17 inčPromjer prednje gume17 inč
Širina stražnje gumeŠirina stražnje gume190 mmŠirina stražnje gume180 mm
Visina stražnje gumeVisina stražnje gume55 %Visina stražnje gume55 %
Promjer stražnje gumePromjer stražnje gume17 inčPromjer stražnje gume17 inč
DužinaDužina2,057 mmDužina2,070 mm
ŠirinaŠirina845 mmŠirina820 mm
Međuosovinski razmakMeđuosovinski razmak1,439 mmMeđuosovinski razmak1,450 mm
Visina sjedalaVisina sjedala814 mmVisina sjedala795 mm
Težina neopterećenog vozila (s ABS-om)Težina neopterećenog vozila (s ABS-om)207 kgTežina neopterećenog vozila (s ABS-om)210 kg
Sukladnost licenceSukladnost licenceASukladnost licenceA

Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na

Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comfortable seating position

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Kawasaki Z900 2019

Fortunately, the new Kawasaki Z900 has lost none of its character through the use of electronics. It is and remains a playful mid-range naked bike, which at the same time masters the brisk pace on the country road magnificently. The riding pleasure and suitability for everyday use are high, the now installed riding aids offer a plus in safety. Your opponents will have a really hard time from now on.

Light and natural handling with high stability

Silky engine with full pull from mid revs

High chassis transparency, great feedback

Sitting position with feel-good factor

Fair price

TFT display mounted too low

Cumbersome menu operation

Rear view mirrors offer modest visibility

Usporedba cijena Prosječna tržišna cijena BMW S 1000 R vs Kawasaki Z900

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2016 and a Kawasaki Z900 2019. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2016 is about 21% higher. A BMW S 1000 R 2016 experiences a loss of 380 USD in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 230 USD for a Kawasaki Z900 2019. Compared to Kawasaki Z900 2019 there are less BMW S 1000 R 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 40. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 69 days compared to 116 days for a Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 since model year 2017. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 93,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z900 published on 11/11/2016.

Cijena BMW S 1000 R

Godina proizvodnje modela
Trenutačne prosječne tržišne cijene

Cijena Kawasaki Z900

Godina proizvodnje modela
Trenutačne prosječne tržišne cijene

Alternativne usporedbe

Partner platforme 1000PS

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH