Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2014
Triumph Speed Triple R 2016
BMW S 1000 R 2014
Pregled - Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 vs BMW S 1000 R 2014
When comparing the Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014, it is important to consider their technical specifications and strengths and weaknesses.
In terms of engine and drive train, both bikes have in-line engines, but the Triumph Speed Triple R has a three-cylinder engine with 140 HP and 112 Nm of torque, while the BMW S 1000 R has a four-cylinder engine with 160 HP and the same torque. The Triumph has a displacement of 1050 ccm, while the BMW has a slightly smaller displacement of 999 ccm.
Both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension and monoshock absorbers for the rear suspension. However, the Triumph has a single swing arm for the rear suspension, while the BMW has a swing arm. The Triumph also has Öhlins suspension components, which are known for their excellent performance.
Triumph Speed Triple R 2016
In terms of brakes, both bikes have double disk brakes with four pistons at the front. The Triumph's brakes are radial and monoblock, while the BMW's brakes are radial. Both bikes also have advanced rider assistance systems, including ABS and traction control for the Triumph, and dynamic suspension for the BMW.
In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. The Triumph has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1435 mm compared to the BMW's 1439 mm. The seat height of the Triumph is 825 mm, while the BMW's seat height is slightly lower at 814 mm. The Triumph also has a slightly higher kerb weight of 212 kg compared to the BMW's 207 kg. The BMW also has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17.5 l compared to the Triumph's 15.5 l.
BMW S 1000 R 2014
When it comes to strengths, the Triumph Speed Triple R has a powerful and unique three-cylinder engine, brute brakes, well-functioning electronic features, excellent Öhlins suspension components, and a traditional look. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R has a sporty chassis, extreme power and performance, very good electronic helpers, a terrific price/performance ratio, and is fast and comfortable on the racetrack and country roads.
However, both bikes also have their weaknesses. The Triumph Speed Triple R has somewhat sluggish handling and a high surcharge for the R version. The BMW S 1000 R has a slightly rough engine running, dynamic suspension that is rather on the "hard" side overall, a relatively high seat, and a design that is a matter of taste.
In conclusion, the Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 are both powerful naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Triumph offers a unique three-cylinder engine and excellent suspension components, while the BMW provides extreme power and performance at a good price/performance ratio. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Tehničke specifikacije Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 u odnosu na BMW S 1000 R 2014
Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na
Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na
Triumph Speed Triple R 2016
Like its predecessor, the Speed Triple R delights with its high-quality, sensitively responding Öhlins suspension and its stunning looks. The design remains true to its line - which can only please the many fans. The engine's braking and responsiveness can hardly be complained about, but the lack of power on the competition and the somewhat sluggish handling can certainly be forgiven, after all, the Speed Triple is a classic with history and the design is legendary - which is much more important to true fans than the one or two extra horsepower.
BMW S 1000 R 2014
Brutal power, smooth, almost perfect, electronics, it only gets better with the HP4. Now BMW dominates the 1000cc naked bike class after the superbikes.
Usporedba cijena Prosječna tržišna cijena Triumph Speed Triple R vs BMW S 1000 R
There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 and a BMW S 1000 R 2014. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 70 days compared to 120 days for the Triumph Speed Triple R. Since model year 2012 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple R and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple R was published on 10/24/2011 and now has more than 11,100 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 11/3/2013.