BMW F 900 R 2020 vs. Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016
BMW F 900 R 2020
Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016
Vue d’ensemble - BMW F 900 R 2020 vs Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016
The BMW F 900 R 2020 and the Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, fuel systems, and cooling systems. However, there are several differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the BMW F 900 R 2020 has a higher output with 105 HP compared to the Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016's 97 HP. The BMW also has a slightly lower torque of 92 Nm compared to the Triumph's 112 Nm. This suggests that the Triumph may have a more powerful and torquey engine, which could result in a more thrilling riding experience.
Both bikes have two cylinders and use fuel injection systems. They also have liquid cooling systems to prevent overheating during long rides. The BMW has a smaller displacement of 895 ccm, while the Triumph has a larger displacement of 1200 ccm. This indicates that the Triumph may have a larger and potentially more powerful engine.
In terms of suspension, the BMW F 900 R 2020 features an Upside-Down telescopic fork for the front suspension and a swing arm with a monoshock for the rear suspension. The Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016, on the other hand, has a telescopic fork for the front suspension and a swing arm with dual shocks for the rear suspension. The BMW's suspension system seems to be more advanced and adjustable with options for preload and rebound adjustment.
BMW F 900 R 2020
Both bikes have steel frames, but the BMW F 900 R 2020 has a Twin Tube, Load-bearing engine frame type, while the Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016 has a central tube frame type. The BMW's frame design suggests better stability and handling, which could result in a more confident riding experience.
In terms of brakes, both bikes have double disk brakes at the front, but the BMW F 900 R 2020 has larger diameter disks at 320 mm compared to the Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016's 310 mm. The BMW also has four-piston calipers at the front, while the Triumph has double-piston calipers. This suggests that the BMW may have better braking performance and stopping power.
In terms of rider assistance systems, the BMW F 900 R 2020 has more advanced features including ABS, anti-slipping control, and riding modes. The Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016 only has ABS. This indicates that the BMW may offer a more technologically advanced and safer riding experience.
Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016
In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front tire width of 120 mm and diameter of 17 inches. However, the BMW F 900 R 2020 has a wider rear tire at 180 mm compared to the Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016's 160 mm. The BMW also has a longer wheelbase at 1518 mm compared to the Triumph's 1415 mm. This suggests that the BMW may offer better stability and handling.
In terms of seat height, the BMW F 900 R 2020 has a slightly higher seat at 815 mm compared to the Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016's 805 mm. Both bikes have relatively low seat heights, which could make them suitable for riders of different heights.
In terms of fuel tank capacity, the BMW F 900 R 2020 has a smaller tank at 13 liters compared to the Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016's 14.5 liters. This suggests that the Triumph may have a longer range and require fewer fuel stops during long rides.
In summary, the BMW F 900 R 2020 and the Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The BMW offers easy handling, high stability, and a well-behaved engine. It also has a wide range of accessories available. On the other hand, the Triumph has a powerful engine, an authentic look, and a genuine classic bike feel. However, it has a chassis that is not as advanced as the BMW's and offers moderate comfort. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Caractéristiques techniques BMW F 900 R 2020 par rapport à Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
BMW F 900 R 2020
La BMW F 900 R offre un plaisir facile à prendre en virage, une énorme stabilité, une position de conduite active mais confortable et un moteur sans friction mais aussi sans émotion. Si vous aimez la vitesse et les virages, vous serez heureux avec elle. Les possibilités de configuration sont infinies mais ne sont pas gratuites.
Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016
En termes de performances sportives, la Thruxton est loin derrière la "R" équipée d'Öhlins et de Showa. C'est particulièrement évident dans les cols alpins, où un bon châssis, des freins puissants et une maniabilité facile sont décisifs. En revanche, elle récompense l'œil de l'esthète par un aspect extérieur encore plus authentique, car plus classique. Les profanes peuvent à peine distinguer une nouvelle Thruxton d'une voiture ancienne ou d'un youngtimer. Comme la Street Twin, elle a un effet sympathique sur les passants et devrait plutôt être appréciée de manière détendue.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché BMW F 900 R vs Triumph Thruxton 1200
There are a few key differences between a BMW F 900 R 2020 and a Triumph Thruxton 1200 2016. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 14. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Thruxton 1200 with 79 days compared to 82 days for the BMW F 900 R. Since model year 2020 1000PS.de editors have written 24 reviews for the BMW F 900 R and 5 reviews for the Triumph Thruxton 1200 since model year 2016. The first review for the BMW F 900 R was published on 11/5/2019 and now has more than 154,700 views. This compares to more than 38,500 views for the first review on Triumph Thruxton 1200 published on 3/9/2016.
