KTM 690 Duke 2013 vs. Yamaha MT-07 2016

KTM 690 Duke 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2013

Yamaha MT-07 2016

Yamaha MT-07 2016

Loading...

Vue d’ensemble - KTM 690 Duke 2013 vs Yamaha MT-07 2016

The KTM 690 Duke 2013 and the Yamaha MT-07 2016 are both popular naked bikes with their own unique features and strengths.

Starting with the KTM 690 Duke 2013, it boasts a lightweight design, weighing in at only 149.5 kg. This light weight contributes to its agility and maneuverability, making it a joy to ride in city traffic or on twisty roads. The bike is powered by a single-cylinder engine with 68 HP and 70 Nm of torque, providing sufficient power for most riding situations. Additionally, the liquid cooling system ensures optimal engine performance even in hot weather conditions. The 690ccm displacement further adds to its power and performance.

KTM 690 Duke 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2013

In terms of suspension, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 features an Upside-Down telescopic fork, which provides excellent handling and stability. The frame is made of chromium-molybdenum, ensuring durability and strength. The front and rear tyres have a width of 120 mm and 160 mm respectively, with a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase measures at 1466 mm, offering stability and control. The seat height is 835 mm, which may be a bit high for shorter riders. The fuel tank capacity is 14 liters, allowing for decent range between refueling stops.

Moving on to the Yamaha MT-07 2016, it has a slightly higher engine power of 75 HP, generated by a twin-cylinder engine. The torque is slightly lower at 68 Nm, but still provides ample power for most riding situations. Like the KTM, it features a liquid cooling system and a displacement of 689ccm.

The Yamaha MT-07 2016 is praised for its very agile engine and easy handling, making it a great choice for riders of all skill levels. The bike is also relatively lightweight, weighing in at 179 kg. Its aggressively angular look adds to its appeal, giving it a sporty and modern aesthetic. The powerful brakes ensure excellent stopping power, adding to the overall safety of the bike. The seating position is comfortable, allowing for long rides without discomfort. The display is extensive and easy to read, providing all the necessary information to the rider.

Yamaha MT-07 2016

Yamaha MT-07 2016

However, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 does have some weaknesses. The chassis is a little soft, which may affect the bike's stability at higher speeds or during aggressive cornering. The footrests may also drag on the ground, limiting the bike's lean angle. Additionally, some plastic parts on the bike may feel cheap and not as durable. The telescopic fork is considered by some to be boring and lacking in performance compared to other suspension systems.

In conclusion, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 and the Yamaha MT-07 2016 are both solid choices in the naked bike category. The KTM offers a lightweight design, sufficient power, and low consumption. On the other hand, the Yamaha provides a very agile engine, easy handling, and a comfortable seating position. Both bikes have their own strengths and weaknesses, so it ultimately comes down to personal preference and riding style.

Caractéristiques techniques KTM 690 Duke 2013 par rapport à Yamaha MT-07 2016

KTM 690 Duke 2013
Yamaha MT-07 2016

Moteur et chaîne cinématique

AlésageAlésage102 mmAlésage80 mm
CourseCourse84.5 mmCourse68.6 mm
Puissance du moteurPuissance du moteur68 chPuissance du moteur75 ch
Tr/min à la puissance max.Tr/min à la puissance max.7,500 tr/minTr/min à la puissance max.9,000 tr/min
CoupleCouple70 NmCouple68 Nm
Tr/min au coupleTr/min au couple5,500 tr/minTr/min au couple6,500 tr/min
Taux de compressionTaux de compression12.6 Taux de compression11.5
Type d’embrayageType d’embrayageAnti-hoppingType d’embrayageMultidisque à bain d’huile
TransmissionTransmissionChaîneTransmissionChaîne
CylindresCylindres1Cylindres2
TempsTemps4 tempsTemps4 temps
SoupapesSoupapesCulbuteur, OHCSoupapesDOHC
RefroidissementRefroidissementliquideRefroidissementliquide
CylindréeCylindrée690 cm³Cylindrée689 cm³

Suspension avant

Suspension avantSuspension avantFourche télescopique inverséeSuspension avantFourche télescopique

Châssis

CadreCadreChrome-molybdèneCadreAcier

Freins arrière

TypeTypeDisqueTypeDisque

Dimensions et poids

Largeur du pneu avantLargeur du pneu avant120 mmLargeur du pneu avant120 mm
Hauteur du pneu avantHauteur du pneu avant70 %Hauteur du pneu avant70 %
Diamètre du pneu avantDiamètre du pneu avant17 poucesDiamètre du pneu avant17 pouces
Largeur du pneu arrièreLargeur du pneu arrière160 mmLargeur du pneu arrière180 mm
Hauteur du pneu arrièreHauteur du pneu arrière60 %Hauteur du pneu arrière55 %
Diamètre du pneu arrièreDiamètre du pneu arrière17 poucesDiamètre du pneu arrière17 pouces
EmpattementEmpattement1,466 mmEmpattement1,400 mm
Hauteur de selleHauteur de selle835 mmHauteur de selle805 mm
Poids en ordre de marchePoids en ordre de marche149.5 kgPoids en ordre de marche179 kg
Capacité du réservoir de carburantCapacité du réservoir de carburant14 lCapacité du réservoir de carburant14 l
Conformité au permisConformité au permisAConformité au permisA

Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison

Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison

KTM 690 Duke 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2013

Pour le plaisir pur, la 690 Duke sans R suffit déjà. Le puissant moteur monocylindre est presque identique, le poids et donc la maniabilité aussi, et l'optique est trop similaire pour être un véritable argument d'achat pour la 690 Duke R.

faible poids

puissance suffisante

faible consommation

pas de réglage possible du châssis

confort réduit

Yamaha MT-07 2016

Yamaha MT-07 2016

La MT-07 est une incroyable machine de plaisir qui se laisse conduire de manière extrêmement sportive. Le moteur est de loin le plus agile de sa catégorie, et même au-delà.

moteur très agile

maniabilité très légère

poids réduit

look agressif et anguleux

freins puissants

position de conduite agréable

son rauque

écran complet et bien lisible

Châssis un peu mou

les repose-pieds ne tardent pas à frotter

pièces en plastique en partie bon marché

fourche ennuyeuse

Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché KTM 690 Duke vs Yamaha MT-07

There are a few key differences between a KTM 690 Duke 2013 and a Yamaha MT-07 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-07 2016 is about 17% higher. A KTM 690 Duke 2013 experiences a loss of 200 USD in one year and 610 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 390 USD and 710 USD for a Yamaha MT-07 2016. Compared to Yamaha MT-07 2016 there are less KTM 690 Duke 2013 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 9 compared to 24. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-07 with 51 days compared to 60 days for the KTM 690 Duke. Since model year 2008 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the KTM 690 Duke and 69 reviews for the Yamaha MT-07 since model year 2013. The first review for the KTM 690 Duke was published on 9/28/2007 and now has more than 14,800 views. This compares to more than 12,600 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-07 published on 11/4/2013.

Prix KTM 690 Duke

Année modèle
Prix moyens actuels du marché

Prix Yamaha MT-07

Année modèle
Prix moyens actuels du marché

Comparaisons alternatives

Partenaire 1000PS

LOUISContinental Motorradreifencalimoto GmbHSchuberthMotorex AG