Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 vs. BMW R 1200 GS 2016
Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013
BMW R 1200 GS 2016
Vue d’ensemble - Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 vs BMW R 1200 GS 2016
The Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 and the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 are both enduro motorcycles that offer a combination of on-road and off-road capabilities. While they share some similarities in terms of specifications, they also have distinct differences that set them apart.
Starting with the engine and drive train, the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 is equipped with an in-line three-cylinder engine with a displacement of 1215cc. It produces 137 horsepower and 121 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 features a boxer twin-cylinder engine with a displacement of 1170cc. It has a slightly lower power output of 125 horsepower and the same torque as the Triumph at 125 Nm.
In terms of suspension, the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 comes with a telescopic fork front suspension with preload adjustment, while the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 has a strut front suspension with preload adjustment. Both bikes offer similar rear suspension setups with preload adjustment.
Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013
In terms of chassis, both motorcycles feature a steel frame. The Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 has a tubular frame, while the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 has a twin tube, load-bearing engine frame.
When it comes to braking, both bikes are equipped with double disk brakes at the front. The Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 has a flawless functioning of the brakes, while the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 has very sharp brakes that may take some getting used to.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 has a front tire diameter of 19 inches and a rear tire width of 150mm, while the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 has the same front tire diameter but a slightly wider rear tire width of 170mm. The wheelbase of the Triumph is 1530mm, while the BMW has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1507mm. The seat height of the Triumph is 840mm, while the BMW has a slightly higher seat height of 850mm. The kerb weight of the Triumph is 267kg, while the BMW is lighter at 238kg. Both motorcycles have a fuel tank capacity of 20 liters.
BMW R 1200 GS 2016
In terms of strengths, the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 is praised for its light handling, agility, and fun-to-ride nature. It also offers easy direction changes and has a comfortable upright seating position. On the other hand, the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 is known for its powerful engine, low fuel consumption, and comfortable seating position. It also has a high reputation in the motorcycle community and can be used off-road.
However, both bikes also have their weaknesses. The Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 does not have a particularly low center of gravity, which may affect its stability in certain situations. The BMW R 1200 GS 2016 has a long and expensive surcharge side, which may be a drawback for some riders. Additionally, the Telelever front suspension on the BMW may take some getting used to, and the sharpness of the brakes can be a bit overwhelming.
In conclusion, the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 and the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 are both capable enduro motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Triumph offers light handling and agility, while the BMW provides a powerful engine and a comfortable seating position. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Caractéristiques techniques Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 par rapport à BMW R 1200 GS 2016
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013
La Triumph Tiger Explorer XC est une moto imposante qui signale dès l'arrêt qu'elle ne veut pas forcément être utilisée abusivement comme machine d'entrée de gamme. Le carénage imposant s'accorde donc très bien avec le caractère global de cette moto masculine britannique.
BMW R 1200 GS 2016
Une GS est à l'aise presque partout - mais sur la piste de course, elle ne l'est que dans une certaine mesure. C'est un plaisir de ressentir la puissance du bicylindre boxer partiellement refroidi par eau à la sortie des virages - 125 ch ne semblent que sur le papier beaucoup plus faibles que 150 ou même 160 ch chez la concurrence. Avec un couple de 125 Newton-mètres, l'attaque par le bas est de toute façon magnifique et la GS, avec ses 238 kilos prête à rouler, ne traîne pas trop de poids malgré son allure imposante. Dans les virages très serrés, le centre de gravité bas a un effet positif - la BMW R 1200 GS est très difficile à casser ! Même la suspension avant Telelever, qui supprime le tangage de la roue avant lors du freinage, s'adapte parfaitement à l'ensemble de la GS et ne peut que légèrement atténuer son caractère sportif.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Triumph Tiger Explorer XC vs BMW R 1200 GS
There are a few key differences between a Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 and a BMW R 1200 GS 2016. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Tiger Explorer XC with 52 days compared to 70 days for a BMW R 1200 GS. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 5 reviews for the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC and 98 reviews for the BMW R 1200 GS since model year 2005. The first review for the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC was published on 9/3/2012 and now has more than 15,000 views. This compares to more than 19,100 views for the first review on BMW R 1200 GS published on 1/20/2004.
