BMW S 1000 RR 2017 vs. BMW R 1200 GS 2017

The BMW S 1000 RR 2017 is a supersport motorcycle that offers a range of impressive features. Its engine is an in-line type with a bore of 80 mm and a stroke of 49.7 mm. This engine delivers a powerful 199 HP and 113 Nm of torque, making it a strong and easy-to-control machine. The compression ratio is 13, ensuring efficient performance. The transmission is a chain drive, providing smooth and reliable power transfer. The S 1000 RR has four cylinders and a displacement of 999 ccm.

In terms of suspension, the front suspension is an upside-down telescopic fork, while the rear suspension is a swing arm. The chassis is made of aluminum and has a twin tube frame, ensuring stability and durability. The front brakes are double disk type, providing excellent stopping power.

The dimensions and weights of the S 1000 RR include a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. The rear tire width is 190 mm and the rear tire diameter is 17 inches. The wheelbase is 1438 mm and the seat height is 815 mm. The kerb weight, including ABS, is 208 kg. The fuel tank capacity is 17.5 liters.

The strengths of the BMW S 1000 RR 2017 include the option for complete electronic equipment, ensuring a high-quality riding experience. The engine is powerful and easy to control, making it suitable for riders of all skill levels. The seating position is comfortable, even for taller riders. The chassis performs well both on the road and at track days.

BMW S 1000 RR 2017

However, the S 1000 RR does have some weaknesses. It can experience brake fade under high load on the racetrack, which may be a concern for riders who push the bike to its limits. The ride quality is good enough for track days, but not ideal for racing. Additionally, some riders may find the appearance of the bike to be somewhat dull, despite its up-to-date technology.

On the other hand, the BMW R 1200 GS 2017 is an enduro motorcycle with its own set of strengths and weaknesses. The engine is a boxer type with a bore of 101 mm and a stroke of 73 mm. It delivers 125 HP and 125 Nm of torque, providing strong performance. The compression ratio is 12.5, ensuring efficient combustion. The transmission is a prop shaft drive, which offers smooth and reliable power transfer. The R 1200 GS has two cylinders and a displacement of 1170 ccm.

In terms of suspension, the front suspension is a strut, while the rear suspension is a single swing arm. The chassis is made of steel and has a twin tube, load-bearing engine frame, providing stability and strength. The front brakes are double disk type, offering powerful stopping capabilities.

BMW R 1200 GS 2017

The dimensions and weights of the R 1200 GS include a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 19 inches. The rear tire width is 170 mm and the rear tire diameter is 17 inches. The wheelbase is 1507 mm and the seat height is 850 mm. The kerb weight, including ABS, is 238 kg. The fuel tank capacity is 20 liters.

The strengths of the BMW R 1200 GS 2017 include its mature concept, strong engine, and easy handling. The powerful brakes provide excellent stopping power, while the adjustable modes and traction control offer versatility and safety. The extensive equipment range allows riders to customize their experience, and the bike has a good image and value retention.

However, the R 1200 GS does have some weaknesses. Many features come at an extra cost, which may be a drawback for budget-conscious riders. Additionally, the boxer engine is exposed in really tough terrain, which could be a concern for riders who frequently encounter challenging off-road conditions.

In conclusion, the BMW S 1000 RR 2017 and the BMW R 1200 GS 2017 are both impressive motorcycles with their own unique features and strengths. The S 1000 RR excels in its powerful engine, comfortable seating position, and good chassis performance. However, it may experience brake fade on the racetrack and has a somewhat dull appearance. On the other hand, the R 1200 GS offers a mature concept, strong engine, and easy handling, along with powerful brakes and an extensive equipment range. However, it may require additional costs for certain features and has a potential vulnerability in tough off-road terrain. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on the rider's specific preferences and needs.