Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs. Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Yamaha XSR900 2016
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Vue d’ensemble - Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
The Yamaha XSR900 2016 and the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, cooling systems, and frame types. However, there are several notable differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 has a higher output with 132 HP compared to the Yamaha XSR900 2016's 115 HP. The Triumph also has a higher torque of 110 Nm compared to the Yamaha's 87.5 Nm. This means that the Triumph may offer a more powerful and aggressive riding experience.
In terms of displacement, the Triumph has a larger engine with a capacity of 1050 ccm, while the Yamaha has a smaller engine with a capacity of 847 ccm. This may result in the Triumph having better acceleration and top speed capabilities.
Both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks for their front suspension, providing stability and control during rides. The chassis of both bikes is made of aluminum and has a twin tube design, ensuring durability and rigidity.
Yamaha XSR900 2016
In terms of tire dimensions, both bikes have a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. However, the Triumph has a wider rear tire with a width of 190 mm compared to the Yamaha's 180 mm. This may result in the Triumph offering better traction and stability during cornering.
The wheelbase of the Yamaha XSR900 2016 is slightly longer at 1440 mm compared to the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011's 1437 mm. This may result in the Yamaha offering better stability at higher speeds.
The seat height of the Yamaha is slightly lower at 815 mm compared to the Triumph's 828 mm. This may make the Yamaha more accessible to riders with shorter inseams.
In terms of weight, the Triumph is heavier with a kerb weight of 219 kg compared to the Yamaha's 188 kg. This may affect the maneuverability and agility of the Triumph.
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
The fuel tank capacity of the Triumph is larger at 17.5 liters compared to the Yamaha's 14 liters. This means that the Triumph may offer a longer riding range before needing to refuel.
In terms of strengths, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 has a greedy engine, well-tuned riding modes, and standard ABS and TC. It also has an authentic modern design and clean workmanship. On the other hand, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 has a controlled chassis, a hard sound, and stability.
In terms of weaknesses, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 has a hard chassis and a seat that could be more comfortable. It also has a speedblock design that is already present on many other models. The Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 has a rough gearing that can sometimes disturb the harmony between the rider and the machine.
Overall, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 may appeal to riders who prioritize a well-tuned engine and modern design, while the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 may appeal to riders who value a controlled chassis and a powerful sound.
Caractéristiques techniques Yamaha XSR900 2016 par rapport à Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Yamaha XSR900 2016
La XSR900 allie les performances d'un streetfighter sportif à l'esthétique d'un naked bike rétro aux finitions soignées. Pour ce faire, les Japonais se servent de leur propre histoire, qui se trouve concentrée et sans faille dans les archives de l'agence de design travaillant depuis 60 ans pour Yamaha. Elle reprend les vertus de la MT-09 et a corrigé quelques-unes de ses faiblesses. Elle se conduit de manière plus harmonieuse, plus contrôlée et, si on le souhaite, plus détendue. Seul le confort, et donc le pilote, souffre de la fermeté du châssis sur les mauvaises routes. Il faut être capable de souffrir un tout petit peu avec un néo-classique.
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
C'est là que même une Super Duke se retrouve à l'étroit, lorsque les virages ne sont pas trop serrés et que la KTM peut pleinement exploiter sa maniabilité radicale et sa capacité de correction dans le rayon, inégalée sur les motos naked. Car la Speed Triple est plus harmonieuse, plus patiente et plus prévisible. La Duke doit être battue, la Triple peut aussi être caressée.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Yamaha XSR900 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050
There are a few key differences between a Yamaha XSR900 2016 and a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha XSR900 2016 is about 4% higher. A Yamaha XSR900 2016 experiences a loss of 1,650 USD in one year and 1,670 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 710 USD and 820 USD for a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011. Compared to Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 there are less Yamaha XSR900 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 5 compared to 6. With 77 days it takes the same amount of time to sell a Yamaha XSR900 or a Triumph Speed Triple 1050. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 and 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 since model year 2005. The first review for the Yamaha XSR900 was published on 11/25/2015 and now has more than 17,600 views. This compares to more than 16,200 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple 1050 published on 10/2/2007.
