KTM 690 Duke 2008 vs. Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016
KTM 690 Duke 2008
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016
Vue d’ensemble - KTM 690 Duke 2008 vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016
The KTM 690 Duke 2008 and the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. However, there are several key differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016 takes the lead with its 106 HP engine, compared to the KTM 690 Duke 2008's 65 HP engine. The Triumph's three-cylinder engine provides a livelier performance and a distinct Tyrolean sound, while the KTM's single-cylinder engine is significantly weaker. This results in the Triumph offering a more exhilarating ride and better acceleration.
Both bikes feature liquid cooling systems, ensuring optimal performance even during long rides. This feature helps to prevent overheating and ensures a consistent engine temperature. Additionally, both models have high-quality components and strong braking systems, providing excellent stopping power and safety.
KTM 690 Duke 2008
In terms of dimensions and weights, the KTM 690 Duke 2008 has a longer wheelbase of 1472 mm, compared to the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016's 1410 mm wheelbase. This longer wheelbase contributes to the KTM's stability, making it a reliable choice for riders who prioritize stability and control. However, the Triumph's shorter wheelbase allows for extremely agile handling, making it a nimble and responsive bike.
The seat height of the KTM 690 Duke 2008 is 865 mm, while the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016 has a lower seat height of 800 mm. This lower seat height on the Triumph makes it more accessible for riders with shorter inseams or those who prefer a lower riding position.
In terms of fuel tank capacity, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016 has a larger tank, holding 17.4 liters of fuel compared to the KTM 690 Duke 2008's 13.5 liters. This larger fuel tank allows for longer rides without the need for frequent refueling.
In terms of strengths, the KTM 690 Duke 2008 boasts a stable frame, relatively low overall weight, good chassis, and high-quality components. These features contribute to its excellent handling and make it a joy to ride. On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016 offers an extremely agile handling, low weight, adjustable chassis, and good brakes. These strengths make it a nimble and responsive bike, perfect for riders who prioritize maneuverability.
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016
However, the KTM 690 Duke 2008 does have some weaknesses. Its single-cylinder engine is significantly weaker compared to the Triumph's three-cylinder engine, resulting in less power and acceleration. Additionally, the KTM may offer somewhat less comfort compared to the Triumph.
On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016 has a weakness in terms of its exhaust. Some riders have reported that the exhaust can be somewhat loud in the long run, which may be a concern for those who prefer a quieter ride.
In conclusion, while both the KTM 690 Duke 2008 and the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016 offer exciting riding experiences, they have distinct differences. The Triumph excels in terms of engine power, agility, and adjustability, while the KTM offers stability, a strong frame, and good handling. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Caractéristiques techniques KTM 690 Duke 2008 par rapport à Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
KTM 690 Duke 2008
Y a-t-il tant de gens qui n'ont pas besoin de 100 chevaux pour stabiliser leur ego ? Je pense que le problème des monocylindres précédents était toujours le design, et non le manque de puissance. Même en tant que petit monocylindre, la Duke parvient à avoir un look vraiment haut de gamme.
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016
La Triumph Street Tripel R est connue pour être une naked bike extrêmement poussive qui procure énormément de plaisir sur les routes de campagne. Mais la petite R-Streety fait également bonne figure sur les pistes de course et n'agace pas avec un châssis spongieux ou une puissance trop faible. Même le système de freinage, avec ses deux disques de 310 millimètres et ses étriers Nissin à quatre pistons montés radialement à l'avant, est à la hauteur de ce que l'on est en droit d'attendre d'une moto très, très sportive, qui est également utilisée en grande partie sur la route ou au quotidien.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché KTM 690 Duke vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R
There are a few key differences between a KTM 690 Duke 2008 and a Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016. It takes less time to sell a KTM 690 Duke with 62 days compared to 85 days for a Triumph Street Triple 675 R. Since model year 2008 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the KTM 690 Duke and 16 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R since model year 2009. The first review for the KTM 690 Duke was published on 9/28/2007 and now has more than 14,800 views. This compares to more than 13,000 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple 675 R published on 7/20/2008.
