Royal Enfield Bullet 500 Classic Chrome 2013 vs. Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020
Royal Enfield Bullet 500 Classic Chrome 2013
Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020
Vue d’ensemble - Royal Enfield Bullet 500 Classic Chrome 2013 vs Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020
The Royal Enfield Bullet 500 Classic Chrome 2013 and the Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020 are both naked bikes that offer unique features and characteristics.
In terms of engine power, the Bullet 500 Classic Chrome has a power output of 28 HP, while the Interceptor 650 boasts a more powerful engine with 47 HP. This means that the Interceptor 650 has a higher performance capability and can provide a more thrilling riding experience. Additionally, the Interceptor 650 has a higher torque of 52 Nm compared to the Bullet 500 Classic Chrome's 41 Nm, which further enhances its acceleration and overall performance.
The Bullet 500 Classic Chrome is equipped with a single cylinder engine, while the Interceptor 650 has a twin-cylinder engine. This difference in the number of cylinders affects the smoothness and power delivery of the engine. The twin-cylinder engine of the Interceptor 650 provides a more refined and balanced performance compared to the single-cylinder engine of the Bullet 500 Classic Chrome.
In terms of cooling systems, the Bullet 500 Classic Chrome relies on air cooling, while the Interceptor 650 features an oil-air cooling system. The oil-air cooling system of the Interceptor 650 enhances the engine's cooling efficiency, allowing for better performance and reliability.
Royal Enfield Bullet 500 Classic Chrome 2013
Both bikes have load-bearing engine frames, which provide stability and durability. This frame type is known for its strength and rigidity, ensuring a solid foundation for the bikes.
In terms of tire specifications, the Interceptor 650 has slightly wider tires compared to the Bullet 500 Classic Chrome. The Interceptor 650 has a front tire width of 100 mm and a rear tire width of 130 mm, while the Bullet 500 Classic Chrome has a front tire width of 90 mm and a rear tire width of 110 mm. The wider tires of the Interceptor 650 contribute to better grip and stability, especially during cornering.
The wheelbase of the Interceptor 650 is slightly longer than that of the Bullet 500 Classic Chrome. The Interceptor 650 has a wheelbase of 1400 mm, while the Bullet 500 Classic Chrome has a wheelbase of 1370 mm. A longer wheelbase generally provides better stability and handling, especially at higher speeds.
In terms of weight, the Interceptor 650 is slightly heavier than the Bullet 500 Classic Chrome. The Interceptor 650 has a dry weight of 202 kg, while the Bullet 500 Classic Chrome weighs 175 kg. The weight difference may affect the maneuverability and agility of the bikes, with the Bullet 500 Classic Chrome potentially being more nimble.
Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020
Both bikes have fuel tanks with decent capacities. The Bullet 500 Classic Chrome has a fuel tank capacity of 15 liters, while the Interceptor 650 has a slightly smaller capacity of 13.7 liters. This means that the Bullet 500 Classic Chrome may have a longer range before needing to refuel.
In terms of strengths, the Bullet 500 Classic Chrome is known for providing true driving pleasure and has a unique and rare classic car appeal. On the other hand, the Interceptor 650 offers a refined engine, a relaxed seating position, good brakes, classic round instruments, and an authentic retro look.
However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The Bullet 500 Classic Chrome has low performance and may feel unsteady at high speeds. The Interceptor 650, on the other hand, may not withstand a sporty driving style due to its chassis and may have an uncomfortable seat for long rides.
Overall, the Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020 offers a more powerful and refined riding experience compared to the Royal Enfield Bullet 500 Classic Chrome 2013. The Interceptor 650's upgraded engine, improved handling, and retro styling make it a more attractive option for riders seeking a combination of performance and classic aesthetics.
Caractéristiques techniques Royal Enfield Bullet 500 Classic Chrome 2013 par rapport à Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Royal Enfield Bullet 500 Classic Chrome 2013
Se faufiler à 70 ans à travers la campagne et ne pas percevoir l'environnement comme un simple trait flou, mais profiter de la beauté de celui-ci. Ou encore rouler à côté d'un mur de béton et percevoir les réflexions sonores du monocylindre à longue course sous le casque - c'est un vrai plaisir de conduire.
Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020
La Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 offre un ensemble très cohérent dans le segment rétro. Une position de conduite décontractée, beaucoup de chromes et un bicylindre cultivé en font un bel objet de désir qui résiste également au quotidien. On cherche en vain des caractéristiques modernes, mais avec une puissance de 47 ch, le contrôle de traction et les modes de conduite seraient de toute façon superflus. Si l'on a envie de ralentir, de se détendre en cruiser et de faire de la moto de manière pure, l'Interceptor 650 fera certainement son bonheur.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Royal Enfield Bullet 500 Classic Chrome vs Royal Enfield Interceptor 650
There are a few key differences between a Royal Enfield Bullet 500 Classic Chrome 2013 and a Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 1 review for the Royal Enfield Bullet 500 Classic Chrome and 16 reviews for the Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 since model year 2018. The first review for the Royal Enfield Bullet 500 Classic Chrome was published on 6/27/2013 and now has more than 41,500 views. This compares to more than 133,500 views for the first review on Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 published on 9/28/2018.
