KTM 390 Duke 2017 vs. Yamaha XJ6 2009

KTM 390 Duke 2017

KTM 390 Duke 2017

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Loading...

Vue d’ensemble - KTM 390 Duke 2017 vs Yamaha XJ6 2009

The KTM 390 Duke 2017 and the Yamaha XJ6 2009 are both naked bikes that offer unique features and characteristics.

In terms of engine power, the Yamaha XJ6 2009 has a clear advantage with 78 HP compared to the KTM 390 Duke 2017's 44 HP. The Yamaha also has a higher torque of 59.7 Nm compared to the KTM's 35 Nm. This means that the Yamaha XJ6 2009 will provide a more powerful and responsive ride, especially in terms of acceleration and top speed.

The KTM 390 Duke 2017, on the other hand, has a single cylinder engine, while the Yamaha XJ6 2009 has a four-cylinder engine. This difference in cylinder configuration affects the overall performance and smoothness of the ride. The Yamaha's four-cylinder engine provides a smoother power delivery and a more refined performance compared to the KTM's single-cylinder engine.

Both bikes have liquid cooling systems, which ensure optimal engine temperature and performance. This is particularly important for long rides or in hot weather conditions.

KTM 390 Duke 2017

KTM 390 Duke 2017

In terms of suspension, the KTM 390 Duke 2017 features an Upside-Down telescopic fork, while the Yamaha XJ6 2009 has a telescopic fork. The Upside-Down fork on the KTM provides better handling and stability, especially during aggressive riding or cornering.

The chassis of the KTM 390 Duke 2017 is made of chromium-molybdenum, which is known for its strength and lightweight properties. This contributes to the bike's low weight and nimble handling. The Yamaha XJ6 2009, on the other hand, has a steel frame with a double cradle design. While this frame provides good stability and durability, it may add some weight to the bike.

Both bikes have 17-inch front and rear tires, which offer good grip and stability on the road. The wheelbase of the KTM 390 Duke 2017 is slightly shorter at 1367 mm compared to the Yamaha XJ6 2009's 1440 mm. This shorter wheelbase contributes to the KTM's agility and maneuverability, making it easier to handle in tight corners or city traffic.

In terms of seat height, the KTM 390 Duke 2017 has a higher seat height of 830 mm compared to the Yamaha XJ6 2009's 785 mm. This may be a factor to consider for riders with shorter inseams or those who prefer a lower seating position.

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Yamaha XJ6 2009

The fuel tank capacity of the KTM 390 Duke 2017 is 13.4 liters, while the Yamaha XJ6 2009 has a larger capacity of 17.3 liters. This means that the Yamaha will have a longer range before needing to refuel, which can be advantageous for longer rides or touring.

In terms of strengths, the KTM 390 Duke 2017 offers a sporty seating position, low weight, TFT display, and a sharp appearance. These features contribute to a more aggressive and dynamic riding experience. On the other hand, the Yamaha XJ6 2009 is praised for its rider-friendly performance characteristics, optimal clutch, playful and lighter handling, seat comfort, and individual look. These strengths make the Yamaha a more versatile and comfortable bike for various riding styles.

As for weaknesses, the KTM 390 Duke 2017 does not have any specific weaknesses mentioned. On the other hand, the Yamaha XJ6 2009 is noted to have design components that are not too demanding and a torque development that may not be as strong as some riders prefer.

In conclusion, the KTM 390 Duke 2017 and the Yamaha XJ6 2009 are both capable naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The KTM offers a sportier and more aggressive riding experience, while the Yamaha provides a more versatile and comfortable ride. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and intended use of the bike.

Caractéristiques techniques KTM 390 Duke 2017 par rapport à Yamaha XJ6 2009

KTM 390 Duke 2017
Yamaha XJ6 2009

Moteur et chaîne cinématique

AlésageAlésage89 mmAlésage65.5 mm
CourseCourse60 mmCourse44.5 mm
Puissance du moteurPuissance du moteur44 chPuissance du moteur78 ch
Tr/min à la puissance max.Tr/min à la puissance max.9,500 tr/minTr/min à la puissance max.10,000 tr/min
CoupleCouple35 NmCouple59.7 Nm
Tr/min au coupleTr/min au couple7,250 tr/minTr/min au couple8,500 tr/min
Taux de compressionTaux de compression12.6 Taux de compression12.2
Type d’embrayageType d’embrayageMultidisque à bain d’huileType d’embrayageMultidisque à bain d’huile
TransmissionTransmissionChaîneTransmissionChaîne
CylindresCylindres1Cylindres4
TempsTemps4 tempsTemps4 temps
RefroidissementRefroidissementliquideRefroidissementliquide
CylindréeCylindrée373.2 cm³Cylindrée600 cm³

Suspension avant

Suspension avantSuspension avantFourche télescopique inverséeSuspension avantFourche télescopique

Châssis

CadreCadreChrome-molybdèneCadreAcier
Type de cadreType de cadreTubulaireType de cadreDouble berceau

Freins avant

TypeTypeDisque uniqueTypeDouble disque

Freins arrière

TypeTypeDisqueTypeDisque

Dimensions et poids

Diamètre du pneu avantDiamètre du pneu avant17 poucesDiamètre du pneu avant17 pouces
Diamètre du pneu arrièreDiamètre du pneu arrière17 poucesDiamètre du pneu arrière17 pouces
EmpattementEmpattement1,367 mmEmpattement1,440 mm
Hauteur de selleHauteur de selle830 mmHauteur de selle785 mm
Capacité du réservoir de carburantCapacité du réservoir de carburant13.4 lCapacité du réservoir de carburant17.3 l
Conformité au permisConformité au permisA2Conformité au permisA

Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison

Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison

KTM 390 Duke 2017

KTM 390 Duke 2017

En fait, il est incroyable de voir à quel point on peut s'amuser avec moins de 50 chevaux. La KTM 390 Duke est un petit canon de plaisir que l'on ne trouve pas ailleurs aussi rapidement. Sa configuration sportive avec sa position de conduite orientée vers la roue avant en fait un véritable attaquant des épingles - dans les épingles, on n'a pas besoin de plus. Son look affûté et son écran TFT lui donnent une allure très haut de gamme.

position d'assise sportive

poids minime

écran TFT

optique pointue

nix

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Malgré une base commune, la XJ semble nettement plus jeune et plus agressive. Une moto de milieu de gamme avec laquelle on ne se sent en aucun cas de classe moyenne. A l'exception du bras oscillant, la moto semble plutôt haut de gamme et cool. La moto est un peu plus souple que la Diversion.

Caractéristique de puissance conviviale

embrayage optimal

maniement ludique et facile

confort d'assise

look individuel

jeune

agressif

haut de gamme.

Composants de conception pas trop exigeants

développement du couple

Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché KTM 390 Duke vs Yamaha XJ6

There are a few key differences between a KTM 390 Duke 2017 and a Yamaha XJ6 2009. In terms of price, the actual average price of a KTM 390 Duke 2017 is about 3% higher. A KTM 390 Duke 2017 experiences a loss of 130 USD in one year and 310 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 200 USD and 20 USD for a Yamaha XJ6 2009. Compared to Yamaha XJ6 2009 there are more KTM 390 Duke 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 8 compared to 6. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha XJ6 with 31 days compared to 66 days for the KTM 390 Duke. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 33 reviews for the KTM 390 Duke and 4 reviews for the Yamaha XJ6 since model year 2009. The first review for the KTM 390 Duke was published on 11/12/2012 and now has more than 26,300 views. This compares to more than 21,900 views for the first review on Yamaha XJ6 published on 11/13/2008.

Prix KTM 390 Duke

Année modèle
Prix moyens actuels du marché

Prix Yamaha XJ6

Année modèle
Prix moyens actuels du marché

Comparaisons alternatives

Partenaire 1000PS

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH